Editorials
[Set Visit Report] Nicolas Winding Refn’s ‘The Neon Demon’
Nicolas Winding Refn’s movies always have a special sort of spontaneity to them. Whether it be Drive, Pusher, Valhalla Rising, or Only God Forgives, all of Refn’s films are usually the product of a rough outline and impulsive, day-of decision making. This is why it comes as no surprise that when it came time to make his latest endeavor, The Neon Demon, the popular genre filmmaker spoke about his project in broad brush strokes, as if he were a modern day Jackson Pollock slapping paint at the screen and seeing what sticks. Frequent on set discussions with his cast usually determines what should come next in the story, as they decide together, as a team, what is best for the feature. Be it music that’s playing in the background, an event that happened that morning that altered Refn’s perspective, or a suggestion from one of his actors, Neon Demon is definitely the product of collaborations by all involved and risks made on a whim that will hopefully pay off in the end.
Last year I was lucky enough to visit the set of The Neon Demon on behalf of Bloody-Disgusting to get a glimpse of the world in which Refn is setting his latest story. We gathered at a rundown motel in Pasadena, California to chat with Refn and star Keanu Reeves and watch a scene from the upcoming flick. This motel will serve as the home of his lead character, sixteen year-old Jesse, as she weaves her way through the cutthroat world of high fashion in the most demanding of all places, Los Angeles. The motel itself is a simple two story roadside inn with a parking garage inside of the structure where a pool would normally be. This motel prides itself on its low rates and color TVs, which helps take away from the fact that the stairways are warped from rain damage and soured from years of little maintenance. It’s the perfect place to pit a fresh California newcomer in a movie about a young adult with little money and big dreams.
In the movie, Jesse (Elle Fanning) wants to be a star, and although there are hundreds of young beautiful girls who travel out to LA every year in the hopes of achieving success in the industry, she seems to stand out in the crowd. There’s just something magical about her, and whether it be her long golden locks or her naïve doe-eyed complexion, she’s turning heads wherever she goes. It may seem like a dream come true at first, but when the veteran models around her begin to take notice of how much attention she’s been getting, they’ll do anything to steal whatever it is that makes her so special, even if it means resorting to ugly tactics.
Of course, this is all subject to change, based on whatever Refn and his crew are feeling day-to-day as they go about filming their tale. “I like uncertainty even though it fucking freaks me out” says Refn when asked about his movie making method. “It’s very instinctual in a way. But I like fear of what it can essentially lead to because it just keeps you on your toes”.
It’s a hot and sunny day when we sit down to talk to Reeves and Refn about their process. Reeves will be playing Hank, the manager of the motel, although his relationship with Jesse, the up and coming model staying at his hotel, isn’t entirely clear. “I’m a motel manager. Elle’s character, Jesse, stays in a motel, and I am the lord – I mean, the manager” Reeves states mysteriously. “I’m a gatekeeper, I’m someone to get past. I’m someone who has his own way of doing things. Almost in a weird way, Jesse kind of sharpens herself – her character is revealed by being challenged, I think to a certain extent, by my character”. When asked if his character was a kind of mentor to Elle’s character, Reeves responded, “It depends on how deeply you want to take that. If your greatest enemy is your greatest teacher, then I’m probably ninth grade”.

Director Refn has a habit of shooting his films in order, which might seem like it makes sense to the casual observer, but any cinephile knows that this is a very different way of making movies. Usually, all movies are filmed out of order to fit with the actors’ busy schedules and because certain locations are only available to shoot at during certain times. However, as per usual, Refn goes against the grain, and because of his unusual method, can only take on actors who are willing to shoot with this style of filmmaking.
“I’m shooting chronologically, in chronological order, which drives certain people insane” Refn explains, going on to describe how frustrating that can be for some actors. “’Why do I have to spend three months of my life for ‘x’ amount of scenes?’ But what it does, is that it allows complete control to morph. Because the film will essentially change radically. I don’t know where it’s going. Yesterday morning, I woke up and I was like, ‘Where are we going to end it from there?’ And that gives me that freedom. So, it’s not so much a rehearsal, it’s more of a process. It’s very much meeting with actors, that process. Do they get the vibe? Do they see the benefits? Because we get there and we go, ‘What would you like to do? What do you want to do?’”
Although this approach to shooting a film can be understandably wearisome for certain actors who find it difficult to dedicate several weeks of their lives to one project when they might only be needed for a few scenes, Reeves seems to revel in Refn’s unique style. “I’ve always been a fan of Nicolas’ films” states Reeves. “I’ve really enjoyed it. For me, I don’t know what it’s like for other actors, but for me to be able to meet with the director and have a sense of the whole project, to just talk about tone, speak a bit about the role. And then on the floor, on the day, it’s really creative just to figure out, what are we doing? Experimenting, playing. Nicolas is very collaborative to a certain extent, he’s always the director. Even though he says, ‘I don’t know, what do you want to do?’ There’s discernment and there’s a ‘yes’ and a ‘no’ or an ‘I don’t like that.’ And then also what’s really fun is the questioning. He has a lot of like, ‘so, what is this? What are you doing?’ And there’s always a kind of take but it’s – he shares the take, and you kind of do that. And even though he speaks about having not a lot of means to do it, you don’t feel rushed in terms of, there’s an energy like, ‘okay, let’s shoot.’ But there is a protection for ‘we can’t fucking shoot until we have some idea of what,’ and that’s what’s fun with that. You’re in the moment”.
According to Reeves, the only real way to prepare for your scene the night before on Refn film is to work on your character, but not necessarily what that character will say or do in the scene you’re about to film the following day. “[Working on The Neon Demon] basically taught me like, be internally ready, have an opinion, work on your character but not necessarily… Don’t fucking make your performance the night before, or come in with that. Which, on certain projects, you can do”. Refn seems just as pleased about working with Reeves as Reeves is about their collaboration. “He gave me eight weeks of his life” says Refn about his leading man. “Come on, how cool is that?”
The scene in particular that we sat down to watch is just as doused in secrecy as our curious conversations. As we watched the monitor, it appeared that Jesse (Fanning) was asleep on the floor of her hotel room. Aside from the fact that it is probably an uncomfortable spot to take a nap, it seems like she must have passed out or fallen asleep accidentally because she’s still done up from head to toe. Her pretty blonde hair is curled to perfection, her face is still bearing glittery makeup, and she’s wearing a sparkly gold halter top and black leather pants. As she lies on the floor sleeping soundly, she is suddenly startled by something that jolts her awake. Something off camera has scared her out of her wits. What it is exactly is unclear, but by the look on Jesse’s face, it must be absolutely terrifying. As she furrows her brows in fear, she quickly backs away from the frame, on all fours, to her bed, hoping to survive whatever demon is after her.

There’s much still left up in the air to decide about the future of the film by the time we leave the set, but one thing’s for sure: this is a very female-centric movie, featuring an almost entirely all female cast, and run behind the scenes by a plethora of women. Director Refn is usually known for having movies that center around a male protagonist, with the rest of the characters mostly being made up of men as well. So why is it that Refn has changed his ways, and chosen this time to make a movie that’s all about women? “It was the one thing I hadn’t done yet” Refns muses. “I usually make movies about violent men, and I felt that it was time, I needed to do something different. Especially after Only God Forgives because you know, what’s the one thing that no one would expect? Well, to do a movie with a sixteen-year-old girl. And even though it’s very conceptual, it’s a bit like setting up an obstacle for one’s self, but taking it as a challenge”. Refn goes on to say that with his newest film, he’s hoping to personally explore some uncharted territory. “I’m exploring the female anatomy”.
Not only is this a movie that’s identified by its many female characters, but it also has Natasha Braier on board, a female director of photography, as well as a female screenwriter, Mary Laws, a young playwright fresh out of Yale University. “I found Mary [Laws] because originally I went to the UK with kind of a structure. With a start, middle and an end. But since it was going to be about young women, I knew that I would benefit greatly from working with a young woman to write with” explains Refn. “And my agent said, ‘Well, we also represent this young playwright out of Yale.’ And I said, ‘Oh, great, a playwright is what I was looking for in the UK and couldn’t find, that suited the movie.’ And so I read some of her stuff and she had a good sense for dialogue, and we called her up and we had a few meetings over the phone and she was super enthusiastic and willing to give it everything she had. She had never written a script before, which I liked. Because not knowing can be a benefit. So I hired her”. Clearly, having as many women as possible onboard for this film was extremely crucial to Refn. “We got three women plus Elle, my producing partner is a woman, Rachel [Dik, EP] sits over there, who works on everything I do, is a woman” says the director. “My publicist is a woman. Natasha [Braier] is a woman, you know. And of course in the end, it all leads back to the uber-woman, who is the wife, who in the end says her strong verdict, what’s right and wrong”.
Refn’s inspiration doesn’t just come from having myriad ladies around him at all times, however. According to the director, a strange and horrific event that apparently occurred during their shooting schedule influenced his work in the oddest way possible, involving what he refers to as his “power blanket”, a.k.a. the blanket he wears around his belly whenever he’s on set.
“I had a very weird incident a few days ago at Musso and Frank’s that I went to see because we had to see the morning locations and I came ten minutes late from dropping my daughter off at school” remembers Refn, “And there was a guy lying in the parking lot, bleeding from a stab wound in the chest. And another man was holding on, putting pressure on it. It was really weird because the man had no shoes on, but white socks and a tie. And this man who was bleeding, there was no one else there. And I got out of the car, and went over and said, ‘Do you need any help?’ And he said, ‘They already called 911, but they need something to hold the blood in.’ And so I gave him my blanket, it was the only thing I had. I didn’t think my shirt was going to work. So I gave him my blanket. And then the guy died. So that was pretty weird. Right in front of me. And then it became a homicide. So then I was locked in and I had to go shoot. And I was like, if we didn’t make the day I wasn’t going to get it back. So they were able to get me out, the police, through Musso and Frank’s, to the set. But as I was waiting to go, and seeing them covering his dead body now, they took my blanket away. And I felt the urge to hear ‘Homicide’ by 999, which used to be one of my favorite songs. And listening to that in that moment gave me a whole perspective on how I was going to shoot the rest of the day”.
It seems like it’s been a crazy shoot, to say the least. As our press group gathers our belongings and begins to head back to our cars, Keanu Reeves tells us that he’s actually been driving his motorcycle to set everyday. When we ask if he’s allowed to do that while he’s working on a movie, since filmmakers usually don’t permit such things while shooting for fear that their actors will get injured, he responds coolly, “I’m allowed to do it when I’m working on The Neon Demon, man”.
The Neon Demon hits theaters everywhere on June 24th, 2016.

Editorials
André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies
In this day and age, the word “troll” is often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.
It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shouts “troll” at the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.
For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.
The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.
As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?
Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.
Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.
There is always a small risk whenever using the term “mockumentary” to describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.
In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.
Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.
Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we call “found footage“.

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.
You must be logged in to post a comment.