Connect with us

Longform

6 Critically Panned Horror Movies from the 2000s That Are Still Worth a Watch

Published

on

Dead Silence 4K

Film criticism is meant to help audiences navigate the ever-growing sea of new releases, but there’s an undeniable divide between many professional critics and the general public. The horror genre has an especially troubled history with conflicting opinions, with certain films only being considered “classics” decades after loyal fans insisted that negative reviews were mistaken. Unfortunately, some movies have the rotten luck of being buried forever underneath a mountain of undeserved bad press, leading to quite a few underappreciated gems.

This was excruciatingly common back in the 2000s, when the horror genre was heavily criticized by folks who didn’t realize that the quality of horror films hadn’t necessarily dropped, but expectations had suddenly changed. That’s why we’ve decided to compile this list of 6 critically panned horror movies from the 2000s that are still worth a watch, as it’s sometimes worth wading through the bargain bin in order to uncover an underappreciated gem or two.

While sorting through movie reviews isn’t an exact science, we’ll be using Rotten Tomatoes scores to judge whether or not a film is unfairly maligned. Of course, these aren’t the only good 2000s horror movies hiding behind negative reviews, so be sure to share your own spurned favorites with us in the comments below.

Now, onto the list…


6. Halloween II (2009) – Rotten Tomatoes Score: 21%

Even if you’re not a fan of Rob Zombie’s unapologetically gritty take on Carpenter’s iconic boogeyman, there’s no denying that the man is a rare example of a horror auteur. A Zombie movie always feels like a Zombie movie, and even if the end result is controversial, I’d rather watch a visionary director’s unique take on a familiar story rather than a safe rehash. That’s why I adore his strange approach to Halloween II.

Mercilessly bashed by critics back in 2009, The Shape’s return to Haddonfield understandably disappointed folks who were expecting a traditional Slasher sequel, but that doesn’t mean it’s a bad film. If you can stomach the edgy dialogue and brooding tone, there’s a sincere exploration of survivor’s guilt and nature versus nurture to be found here, and the kills are more gruesome than ever. I only wish more critics had appreciated this refreshingly bleak vision of how life might continue after a Slasher flick.


5. Riding the Bullet (2004) – Rotten Tomatoes Score: 26%

From The Shining to The Mangler, not all Stephen King adaptations are created equal, and part of that is due to the difficulty of adapting King’s introspective character work to a visual medium. Based on the homonymous short story, Mick Garris’ Riding the Bullet was originally panned due to its lackluster scares and corny setup, but focusing on those elements kind of misses the point of this fun little character piece.

While the movie is admittedly a little cheesy, dealing with familiar themes of returning home and facing ghostly memories, it’s also a nostalgic throwback with a lot of heart and some memorable performances. David Arquette is particularly enjoyable as the undead George Staub, and it’s hard not to root for Jonathan Jackson as our hitchhiking protagonist. The flick’s groovy late 60s soundtrack is just further icing on the cake.


4. Cry Wolf (2005) – Rotten Tomatoes Score: 24%

The days of annoying e-mail chain letters are mostly behind us, but Jeff Wadlow’s 2005 feature Cry Wolf remains as a snapshot of a time when urban legends went digital. Following a group of prep school students as they face the deadly aftermath of a viral serial killer hoax, Cry Wolf may be dated in both dialogue and plot elements, but it’s also a surprisingly entertaining mystery.

A fake serial killer claiming real-life victims after becoming an online sensation makes for a really fun premise, and the whodunnit aspect keeps things interesting as these privileged students (including Supernatural‘s Jared Padelecki) start to turn on each other. The movie probably would have had a bigger impact as a more traditional R-rated Slasher, and the ending doesn’t quite tie up all of the story’s loose ends, but Cry Wolf is still a competently made thriller with some satisfying twists and turns.


3. Gothika (2003) – Rotten Tomatoes: 15%

Ghostly murder mysteries are rarely as stylish as Mathieu Kassovitz’s Gothika, a moody thriller about a psychiatrist (Halle Berry) that gets into a car accident and wakes up being accused of murder. While the film was trashed by most critics at the time, who accused it of being a pulpy mess, I believe that those pulpy elements are precisely what make it such a charming experience in the first place.

This isn’t Berry at her best (though her role as Dr. Miranda Grey netted her a Teen Choice Award for Choice Actress), but she’s still a compelling protagonist in a lovingly crafted thriller that isn’t afraid to get a little weird in both visuals and storytelling. The supernatural aspect might be a bit too silly for some viewers, but I find that the film is highly entertaining as long as you don’t take it too seriously.


2. Thirteen Ghosts (2002) – Rotten Tomatoes: 16%

The early-to-mid 2000s saw a curious trend of critically reviled remakes of 50s horror movies, but Thirteen Ghosts stands out as one of the strangest. Featuring Tony Shalhoub and Matthew Lillard trapped in a glass mansion with a collection of murderous phantoms, I believe the wacky premise alone is enough to justify the price of admission.

Obviously, most critics didn’t see it that way, claiming that the plot and characters were much less interesting than the ghosts’ creative designs and backstories. While I agree that the implied mythology is better than the film’s actual story, this retro romp through a bizarre haunted house is still a fun time if you’re up for a no-frills midnight movie. Just be prepared for plenty of cheesy dialogue alongside the impressive ghost makeup.


1. Dead Silence (2007) – Rotten Tomatoes: 21%

While it’s hard to imagine nowadays, there was once a time when James Wan and Leigh Whannell had yet to be cemented as modern-day Masters of Horror. Back in 2007, the duo had a critical bomb on their hands with the supernatural thriller Dead Silence, a misunderstood gem featuring ghostly ventriloquists and creepy puppets.

Whannell admits to having some regrets about the screenplay, going so far as to claim that the studio brought in a script doctor to revise his original vision, but I’d argue that Dead Silence is almost as entertaining as Insidious, Whannel and Wan’s more popular collaboration. Things may get a little silly towards the end, but it’s still a fun ride and l think it’s a shame that Mary Shaw never returned for an even spookier sequel.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading