William Friedkin Has Only Seen 40 Minutes of 'Exorcist II,' Which He Calls a "Piece of Shit" - Bloody Disgusting
Connect with us

Movies

William Friedkin Has Only Seen 40 Minutes of ‘Exorcist II,’ Which He Calls a “Piece of Shit”

Published

on

On paper, Exorcist II: The Heretic was a surefire hit, coming along just four years after William Friedkin‘s The Exorcist become a cultural phenomenon and with John Boorman (Deliverance) in the director’s chair. Of course, the ’77 film was a box office disappointment that was ripped apart by critics, some calling it the worst horror movie ever made.

So what does William Friedkin think of The Exorcist II? On the podcast The Movies That Made Me, via Entertainment Weekly, Friedkin just offered up some harsh recollections.

I tell you, I did see a great deal of Exorcist II, under the following circumstances. I was at the Technicolor lab, color timing something, and one of the timers said, ‘We just finished Exorcist II, would you like to have a look at it?’ And I don’t know why, but I went into the room and I sat through maybe 40 minutes of it,” Friedkin told the show’s hosts.

He continued, holding nothing back, “It’s the worst piece of shit I’ve ever seen. It’s a fucking disgrace. And God, what a cast it had — Richard Burton, and Max von Sydow, and Louise Fletcher, plus Linda Blair. James Earl Jones. That’s the worst 40 minutes of film I have ever seen, really, and that’s saying a lot.”

It’s interesting to note that John Boorman was considered early on to direct The Exorcist, but he turned down the job. At the time, he says he found the story “rather repulsive.”

The Exorcist II grossed $30,749,142 in the United States, against a $14 million budget.

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has three awesome cats. Still plays with toys.


AROUND THE WEB


Click to comment