Connect with us

Editorials

Adam Sandler Once Produced a Horror Movie … and It’s Not Bad

Published

on

“Happy” and “Madison” are names that likely remind most of two of the biggest comedy hits from the ‘90s, Happy Gilmore and Billy MadisonPut together, they equal the production house “Happy Madison” that Gilmore and Madison star Adam Sandler created and populated with his talented friends early in his career.

Besides Sandler’s own movies, Happy Madison has brought to the screen hits like Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo, Joe Dirt and Grandma’s BoyThey have even moved outside of the comedy realm to dive into more dramatic leaning fare like Funny People and Reign Over MeOne other genre the studio dabbled in — but only once — was horror.

That’s right. Adam Sandler produced a horror movie.

2009’s The Shortcut, executive produced by Sandler, was conceived in 2008 as the first film in a potential line of horror movies from the new Happy Madison division, Scary MadisonThe film, which stars a young Dave Franco and is directed by Nicholas Goossen of Grandma’s Boy fame, is about two brothers who move to a new town and come in contact with a rarely used shortcut that is rumored by locals to be haunted.

The Shortcut mostly went unnoticed when originally released and Happy Madison quickly abandoned the idea of pursuing horror films altogether, which is a shame because The Shortcut played with enough interesting ideas to suggest that Scary Madison had potential as a horror division worth paying attention to.

Mind you, The Shortcut definitely has its faults.

It’s easy to smell a troubled production from the start with this one. Large bits of film or script feel like they have been left behind and what’s left is a bare-bones, 85-minute horror movie that never quite reaches its full potential. Co-writer Dan Hannon had once revealed that the script was rewritten numerous times before production commenced and the film only ended up earning financial backing after agreeing to a PG-13 rating. Sigh. 

Another major fault is with the acting. There are occasional highlights — mostly from the charismatic Franco — but the acting nearly all around can make this movie feel cheap and amateurish at times. However, there’s still enough here that anyone who hasn’t seen this film should really check it out.

The shortcut in question has a history tied to a killer kid and a rich family betrayed by their town and their own stature in the world. A group of kids in the modern day begin investigating some strange happenings on the shortcut and it leads to nothing good for them. This shortcut creates an incredibly interesting mythology that provides a compelling foundation.

The Shortcut packs a lot of surprises for being what it is. It feels like an episode of “The Twilight Zone” drawn out to feature length. If it had been cut down to be an episode of television, it actually probably would have worked much better. And The Shortcut has the heart and passion that only a film made by true fans can have. While parts of it feel compromised by the process of moving from script to screen, this is a wild ride that you would have once been blessed to find scrolling through cable channels after midnight while the rest of the world sleeps.

The Shortcut has time jumps, mythology, killer kids, and all kinds of surprises… everything a good supernatural mystery needs. Those elements don’t always come together, but the way they are blended here makes for a fun watch and shows that the film deserved a little more attention than it got upon initially being released onto the world.

If The Shortcut is any indication, the folks at Happy Madison are true horror fans who have an eye for good campfire stories. Who knows, maybe Adam Sandler and company will feel the horror bug bite them once again in the future. Personally speaking, I’d be here for it.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading