Connect with us

Editorials

Juan Piquer Simón’s ‘Slugs’ Still Has Us Squirming from Head to Toe [Horrors Elsewhere]

Published

on

Slugs

Horrors Elsewhere is a recurring column that spotlights a variety of movies from all around the globe, particularly those not from the United States. Fears may not be universal, but one thing is for sure a scream is understood, always and everywhere.

Over the years, horror has turned the most innocuous creatures into rabid and voracious man-eaters. Rabbits, sheep and toads have all raged against humans at one point in the genre. Yet the most absurd of these unconventional killers has to be the crawly namesakes of the 1988 movie, SlugsThose garden variety pests are no longer on the low end of the food chain.

In Slugs, the population of the small town of Ashton are totally unaware of the marauding molluscs festering and feeding beneath the ground they walk on. The resident health inspector, Mike Brady (Michael Garfield), mistakenly thinks a drunkard’s death is the work of an aberrant animal attack; rats, raccoons, or wild dogs perhaps. Meanwhile, other goings-on suggest this is not an isolated incident: a rash of half-eaten pets, a suspicious multitude of slime trails near crime scenes, and a foul odor originating in the sewers and then coming up through the pipes. Mike and his wife Kim (Kim Terry) eventually seek the help of a college professor (Santiago Álvarez) and a sanitation worker (Philip MacHale) after the police and mayor dismiss their wild theory about these oozy invaders.

Slugs

Based on Shaun Hutson’s ‘literary nasty’ of the same name, Juan Piquer Simón’s adaptation brings the author’s morbid vision of slugs to life. It is one of those rare occasions where the movie is fairly faithful to the source material. However, the novel is still more gruesome and agonizing than anything seen on screen. Matching the text in this case would have required extra time and money, as well as more clemency from the censors. Hutson makes mention of the slugs ravaging male genitalia and traveling up the backside so they can reach the body’s “more succulent parts.” The sex scenes in the book are also quite graphic. The author spared no details when it came to describing both carnage and carnal urges.

While Slugs is a Spanish production adapted from a British novel, Simón wanted the movie’s story set in America. His colleague and the one who vouched for the book in the first place, production supervisor Larry Ann Evans, selected one of her childhood homes as the main venue. As mentioned in Evans’ interview on Arrow’s Blu-ray release, the three-week shoot in Lyons, New York was a hurried one considering the fact that Frank LaLoggia’s Lady in White was shooting there at the same time. The cast, a mix of Spanish and American actors, yields a number of unintentionally funny performances due to the director’s emphasis on visuals and effects, and his tendency to do as few takes as possible.

Slugs

Slugs is not anywhere as aggressive with its eco-horror messaging as its contemporaries or predecessors. Revealing the cause of the title monsters’ mutation — what else could it be other than toxic waste — is more of a passing explanation than an actual plea to stop pollution. On the other hand, the story does serve as a reminder of how ecological problems affect everyone. From the run-down parts of Ashton to the more gentrified areas, the slugs are not selective with their meals. They chow down on the above-mentioned souse (Stan Schwartz) who lives in squalor just as easily as a respected businessman driven by avarice. Soon the slugs move deeper into the town’s epicenter and up the societal ladder.

Slugs are famously slow, vulnerable to salt, and by and large, they prefer greens to human flesh. Knowing that, Simón makes a convincing case for their new roles as mucousy murderers. He counters logic with the most unsettling scenarios. On the cusp of Halloween, these ravenous gastropods emerge from their dank dwellings and start turning Ashton into their all-they-can-eat buffet. The menu includes an older couple who perish in a bizarre greenhouse explosion. This of course comes after the husband chops his own hand off to rid himself of a slug with a vise-like bite. Then there is the movie’s hors d’oeuvre; a young fisherman is consumed underwater in the cold open. Besides the revelation of the sewage runoff in the lake, this moment is disconnected to anything else in the movie. Lastly, a scene that leaves a bad taste in everyone’s mouth is the cruel demise of Pam (Tammy Reger), a teenager who is dragged away by slugs while her molester gets off scot-free.

Slugs

Appreciators of Slugs are haunted by two indelible scenes. The first features Kim’s indignant student Donna (Kari Rose) and her boyfriend being attacked mid-coitus by a mass of hungry black shapes. The other remarkable scene is partly inspired by real life. After unknowingly ingesting a slug, David (Emilio Linder) suffers the most explosive headache known to man. Simón is rarely brought up in talks of body horror, but here he gives his esteemed peers a run for their money. He evokes visceral disgust on top of basic empathy for the shallowest of characters.

The entirety of creature features thrives on nonsense, but few approach the bar as well or as boldly as Slugs does. Simón’s stab at the subgenre is elevated by imaginative set pieces, a spectacular level of schlock, and an ability to make its audience near sick with revulsion. Scene after scene, this iconic B-movie has everyone squirming from head to toe.

Slugs

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading