Connect with us

Books

‘Darkness Falls’ – Revisiting the Tooth Fairy Horror Movie and Its Novelization

Published

on

darkness falls

“Darkness Falls wasn’t much different from any old-fashioned town on the Atlantic Ocean from Nantucket to Key West. Except for one thing.

That one thing, of course, is Matilda Dixon, better known as the Tooth Fairy. Most horror fans likely recognize this in-your-mouth ghost from her 2003 big-screen vehicle, but what they might not realize is, the movie Darkness Falls was accompanied by a novelization. The first of two media tie-ins — the other being a single-issue comic from Dark Horse — was published by PocketBooks shortly before the movie was released in theaters. And, like in many cases, much of what ended up on the cutting room floor can be found in the novelization. 

While novelizations tend to be different from their cinematic counterparts, Keith R. A. DeCandido’s literary adaptation of Darkness Falls stays largely true to the movie. In fact, this book uses a more intact version of James Vanderbilt and John Fasano’s original screenplay, which was based on Joe Harris’ story and short film Tooth Fairy. Director Jonathan Liebesman and those others behind the camera of Darkness Falls made the right call about certain changes. However, the over-editing also had its drawbacks, including the unfortunate downsizing of the movie’s antagonist.

Author DeCandido had the luxury of expanding on events that led to Darkness Falls’ curse. Meanwhile, the movie condenses Dixon’s origin into a two-minute prologue doubling as an exposition dump. As one might guess, this reduction in Dixon’s life story entailed changes both big and small. According to the movie’s visual preface, Dixon was an older woman with no husband to speak of, whereas the novelization depicts her as a younger widow shortly before her death. Several years before her public execution in 1841 — after her being wrongly accused of murdering two children — Matilda’s husband, Sonny, died in a fishing accident. His passing, needless to say, had a profound effect on a woman whose sole wish was to have children of her own.

darkness falls

Image: Emma Caulfield and Lee Cormie’s characters, respectively Caitlin and Michael, fear the Tooth Fairy.

Matilda lost a lot more than just a husband in the novelization. With Sonny’s passing, Matilda essentially lost her chance at motherhood; Captain Dixon clearly was not ready to have a family prior to his death, seeing as he wanted “just a few more trips at sea” before settling down. So, motherless and widowed, Matilda did the next best thing in Sonny’s absence: she coveted other people’s kids. Her envy, while indeed odd, was nothing harmful. In exchange for one’s last baby tooth, Matilda offered a homemade treat — gold coins in the movie — to anyone willing to travel to her home by the local lighthouse. Sadly, the townsfolk of Darkness Falls took this gesture in bad faith and acted on their preexisting prejudice toward the Dixon widow.

After reading the novelization, the suggestion that Darkness Falls is a supernatural twist on the psycho-biddy (or hagsploitation) subgenre is not so baseless. Matilda Dixon does not fulfill the precise criteria for an average psycho-biddy; she better meets the age requirement in the movie, yet it is the novelization that establishes her as a beautiful woman whose mental health steadily declined as she grew older, lonelier and more ostracized. The important catalyst of waning glamor is lacking in Darkness Falls, only because Matilda’s deteriorated sense of self and postmortem rampage are not tied to her appearance. And after being treated as such in life, the Tooth Fairy became a real monster in death.

Matilda is not the only character in Darkness Falls whose backstory was diminished in the movie’s final cut. In the novelization, the inevitable hero, Kyle Walsh, starts out as a troubled preteen who does little to endear himself to readers. This thornier take on young Kyle mocks his peers’ class presentations — perhaps deservedly so because every kid was churning out the same whitewashed report on Darkness Falls and the Tooth Fairy legend — before stabbing his bully in the back with a protractor. The movie went in a different direction than expected during rewrites and reshoots, so there was no longer a need to establish Kyle as an antisocial youth.

darkness falls

Image: The Tooth Fairy.

In what became the movie’s remarkably effective opener — and, overall, its best set-piece — DeCandido is initially vague about who really killed Kyle’s mother in the novelization. This is on account of earlier plans to conceal the existence of the Tooth Fairy until later on, and having the audience believe Kyle (played by the late Chaney Kley) was killing everyone. As hard as it is to imagine Darkness Falls as anything but a barefaced movie about a vengeful phantom, this rug-pull would not have felt out of place. In that current horror climate, ridiculous plot twists were not unusual. Having Kyle be the red herring, only to then reveal a ghost was the culprit all along, however, might not have gone over too well with viewers somehow anticipating an entirely different kind of movie. Nevertheless, the regrettable lack of suspense could be attributed to this change in game plan.

Liebesman shot Darkness Falls “without a firmly set design for the Tooth Fairy in place.” The movie’s spectral villain experienced several makeovers over the course of production before eventually settling on Stan Winston Studio’s proposal. The final look of Matilda, one resembling a woman with severe burns all over her body, is unlike the previous design that was immortalized by McFarlane Toys. The novelization’s portrayal of the Tooth Fairy is closer in line with the Winston model, although the writing submits Matilda’s image as more grotesque and putrid. DeCandido wrote of Matilda’s traumatized visage: “There were burns all over her face, half her lips weren’t even there anymore, her nose was withered, and her forehead was a crackling mass of red flesh.” While Matilda’s unmasked movie mug is not quite as ghastly-looking as the novelization’s description, the unveiling during the last act is not only a horrific sight to behold, it is a testament to practical effects in horror. 

Darkness Falls is not fondly remembered, even as horror audiences look back more kindly at the genre’s erratic yet experimental 2000s period. And the chances of this movie receiving an outpouring of positive reappraisal seems unlikely. All the initial criticisms remain spot on: the undercooked script, the paper-thin characters, and a shortage of scares. Pushing past that, however, there is still the chance for some meager fun in this insubstantial but attractive ghost story.

Foolish studio meddling ultimately ruined Darkness Falls’ chances to be as thoroughly creepy as its opening sequence. Surely seeing too much of the Tooth Fairy on screen made her less intimidating. Maybe even goofy. The novelization’s prequel parts, on the other hand, give Matilda more weight as a sympathetic villain. Anyone who thought she was squandered in a mediocre movie is encouraged to seek out the novelization. If not that, at least the standalone comic that details the same tragic history of Matilda Dixon.

darkness falls

Image: The cover of the Darkness Falls novelization.

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Books

‘Halloween: Illustrated’ Review: Original Novelization of John Carpenter’s Classic Gets an Upgrade

Published

on

Film novelizations have existed for over 100 years, dating back to the silent era, but they peaked in popularity in the ’70s and ’80s, following the advent of the modern blockbuster but prior to the rise of home video. Despite many beloved properties receiving novelizations upon release, a perceived lack of interest have left a majority of them out of print for decades, with desirable titles attracting three figures on the secondary market.

Once such highly sought-after novelization is that of Halloween by Richard Curtis (under the pen name Curtis Richards), based on the screenplay by John Carpenter and Debra Hill. Originally published in 1979 by Bantam Books, the mass market paperback was reissued in the early ’80s but has been out of print for over 40 years.

But even in book form, you can’t kill the boogeyman. While a simple reprint would have satisfied the fanbase, boutique publisher Printed in Blood has gone above and beyond by turning the Halloween novelization into a coffee table book. Curtis’ unabridged original text is accompanied by nearly 100 new pieces of artwork by Orlando Arocena to create Halloween: Illustrated.

One of the reasons that The Shape is so scary is because he is, as Dr. Loomis eloquently puts it, “purely and simply evil.” Like the film sequels that would follow, the novelization attempts to give reason to the malevolence. More ambiguous than his sister or a cult, Curtis’ prologue ties Michael’s preternatural abilities to an ancient Celtic curse.

Jumping to 1963, the first few chapters delve into Michael’s childhood. Curtis hints at a familial history of evil by introducing a dogmatic grandmother, a concerned mother, and a 6-year-old boy plagued by violent nightmares and voices. The author also provides glimpses at Michael’s trial and his time at Smith’s Grove Sanitarium, which not only strengthens Loomis’ motivation for keeping him institutionalized but also provides a more concrete theory on how Michael learned to drive.

Aside from a handful of minor discrepancies, including Laurie stabbing Michael in his manhood, the rest of the book essentially follows the film’s depiction of that fateful Halloween night in 1978 beat for beat. Some of the writing is dated like a smutty fixation on every female character’s breasts and a casual use of the R-word but it otherwise possesses a timelessness similar to its film counterpart. The written version benefits from expanded detail and enriched characters.

The addition of Arocena’s stunning illustrations, some of which are integrated into the text, creates a unique reading experience. The artwork has a painterly quality to it but is made digitally using vectors. He faithfully reproduces many of Halloween‘s most memorable moments, down to actor likeness, but his more expressionistic pieces are particularly striking.

The 224-page hardcover tome also includes an introduction by Curtis who details the challenges of translating a script into a novel and explains the reasoning behind his decisions to occasionally subvert the source material and a brief afterword from Arocena.

Novelizations allow readers to revisit worlds they love from a different perspective. It’s impossible to divorce Halloween from the film’s iconography Carpenter’s atmospheric direction and score, Dean Cundey’s anamorphic cinematography, Michael’s expressionless mask, Jamie Lee Curtis’ star-making performance but Halloween: Illustrated paints a vivid picture in the mind’s eye through Curtis’ writing and Arocena’s artwork.

Halloween: Illustrated is available now.

Continue Reading