Connect with us

Editorials

Horror Education of the Week – Double Feature: ‘1984’ and ‘Metropolis’

Published

on

George Orwell’s novel 1984 is an attack on totalitarian government where the state controls all aspects of life and has impacted how many people see, understand, and talk about modern social movements. In Fritz Lang’s Metropolis, the city is a crowded one where people are either of the privileged elite, or of the repressed, impoverished masses.

In their works, Orwell and Lang both present the imminent dangers of the contemporary social and political world. These works evaluate the mechanisms of power in institutions that practice socio-political supremacy and tyranny.


– In 1984, Orwell presents a controlled society in which political terror, along with propaganda, program individuals to obey. The society is controlled in every way of life – work, thought, speech, sex, and every manner of life. The society has fear instilled in them by “BIG BROTHER” who is constantly watching them.

– Orwell represents this environment further by including all-pervading television screens that constantly show government propaganda. These two-way television screens are also used for surveillance.

Metropolis takes place in the year 2000 in a cold, mechanical, industrial world. The society consists of a lower class that lives underground and runs the machines that keep the above ground Metropolis in working order. The workers run the machines, but the machines run the lives of the monotonous horde of workers.

– The thought is that highly advanced societies are either welfare or warfare states. Welfare states restrict freedom due to the limitations of leisure time, access to necessary goods and services, and citizen’s ability to realize true self-determination. The warfare state hinders a true analysis of society because it keeps people focused on fighting the “enemy” instead of focused on internal social problems. The point is that if societies can learn to use technologies in ways that benefit citizens, instead of restricting them then the problems of humans will be solved.

– In the Underground City beneath Metropolis, Freder Fredersen sees an old worker wrestling with the dials on a piece of clock-like machinery. The worker fails to keep up with the difficulty of the machine and the machine blows up. Freder sees the masses of workers being shoved into the mouth of the monstrous machine.

– Technology is ordered and formed by the interests that produce it. In a capitalist society, certain capitalist interests are rooted in technology, yet technology becomes relatively independent and can take on a life of its own. Metropolis must be fed human slaves to keep control.


1984 has open political domination that includes torture and murder, which is at the heart of the society’s social control. By the means of propaganda, manipulation, consumerism and forbidden indulgence that force individuals into advanced capitalism and to produce a one-dimensional society and individual. Capitalism and technology are forms of social control and domination.

– Freder’s father, Joh Fredersen, the Master of Metropolis rules and dominates the city. Freder asks his father,” Why do you treat the workers so badly?” Joh replies that it was, “their hands that built Metropolis!”

– Lang and Orwell both comment on individualism while Orwell clearly shows that it is possible to have both socialism and individualism as long as socialism protects, preserves, and develops individuality to its fullest. Orwell questioned if a centralized state would truly protect the individual because economic liberty is central to capitalism.

– Lang and Orwell both present some form of the lack of language and thought in their contemporary eras. Lang showed in Metropolis how a society would form thought and behavior through control of language through Maria. This theme is central to Orwell’s vision of 1984 as well.

– Maria speaks to the workers deep in the catacombs at an alter with crosses on it. The catacombs are where the ancient Christians used to hide out and worship when seeking refuge from prosecution for their beliefs. Freder collapses to his knees as if worshipping Maria as she tells the workers the story of the Tower of Babel. The parallel is made between the slaves who built Babel, and the workers who built and maintain Metropolis. In Maria’s speech, she talks about how the rulers of Babel did not care about the slaves. The rulers of Metropolis do not care about the workers. Both places need a mediator between those who rule, and those who are ruled.

– Orwell also calls attention to the deterioration of language and truth in contemporary political communication. 1984 shows the dominance of mass communications in politics and the way political speech has resulted in a decline of truth and honesty. This analysis provides powerful tools to develop a critique of language and politics in the contemporary era.

– After Maria speaks, Joh tells Rotwang, the inventor, to make a robot that looks like Maria. Joh believes that if he had a duplicate of Maria that he would have control over and could manipulate the workers. He would have a powerful tool.

– The new robot Maria is an evil, lusty character unlike the pure, angelic real Maria. The robot Maria gives a weak speech to the workers. She ill advises her followers to take up violence, not peace. Maria leads the masses to the machines in the Underground City and orders them to be destroyed. The workers do not know that destroying the machines will flood the area and drown their children. The machines are bound by the people, and the people are bound by the machines. By working together, they can replace the power of the rulers.

– The governments of the advanced industrial societies become part of and use the technological, scientific and mechanical productivity to secure themselves. The machine then becomes the most powerful political instrument, surpassing the political power of any individual or group.

1984 is a meticulously pessimistic and anti-utopian text. Orwell’s protagonist, Winston Smith, writes in his notebook and then states, “If there is hope, it lies with the proles.” Smith becomes so broken by his society that in the end he has betrayed everything he ever believed in and loved. Orwell denies that there is any profound capacity for humans to fight for what they believe in such a society.

– Orwell writes that these parties can remold human beings by destroying their ability and desire to fight back and brainwashing them. Winston Smith submits torture by the villain O’Brien; rejects his true love, Julia; and in the last sentence declares that he now loves BIG BROTHER. Orwell proves in fiction that it is possible for the state totally to control thought, behavior, and feeling. Orwell also makes the statement that humans are weak and selfish and they will ultimately submit to whatever sort of state attempts to control them.

– Orwell’s warning in 1984 about repressive and horrendous social trends might drive people to oppose the sorts of oppression he projects. 1984 has become a central part of the contemporary culture and political landscape. Orwell’s language and imagery are effective as critiques that can ultimately be used for the good.

– Orwell projects pessimism so extreme that hope for a better future seems to be ruled out in advance when seeking out forms of resistance and struggle. Freedoms give a wide range of choices, but they still do not permit the individual to determine what can be chosen and what is chosen. They cannot define the number of hours they are willing to work to fulfill their needs. Products serve to teach and control.

– In Metropolis, there is still hope for the better as the masses march into the church, and they realize that Freder is the mediator they where seeking. They found the midway point between Joh and the workers. The ruler and the ruled.

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading