Connect with us

Editorials

MTV’s “Scream” Twist Gives Homage to ‘Friday the 13th’?

Published

on

Ghostface Scream MTV

Fan theories are the worst. Therefore, I’m the worst.

But this is just too much fun to brush off my shoulders, especially after Wes Craven’s hint yesterday that accompanied the unveiling of the new Ghostface mask to be used in MTV’s “Scream,” debuting June 30th.

The mask, shown above, came as a surprise as it’s not quite the fleshy look promised late last year. It looks more like it’s formed to the face of someone.

Yesterday, Craven said that the new mask “takes the series into a new direction,” and that it “ties into the story.”

Exec producer Jill Blotevogel then said that the mask “evokes some of the Jason [Voorhees] hockey mask and the white Michael Myers mask.”

While I was walking my dog I kept thinking about the new Ghostface mask, and was obsessing over who or what‘s hiding underneath.

Then I remembered something I saw in the “Scream” series’ trailer. What you see below is a screengrab of a photo that looks to be of a deformed teenager. You guys catching on yet?

Scream-MTV

Okay, so, Craven says the series ties into the story, and we have a producer referencing Jason Voorhees…

And then there’s this.

Let’s take a look at the 7:00 mark of the opening scene of Wes Craven’s 1996 Scream.

Here, Casey (Drew Barrymore) is being tormented by Ghostface. The unknown killer has made himself known, and now wants to play a game – answer the killers’ questions correction and her boyfriend, Steve, gets to live.

Ghostface asks, “Name the killer in Friday the 13th.” Casey, as excited as ever, exclaims that she knows the answer. She declares the killer as “Jason…Jason…Jason!”

“I’m sorry, that’s the wrong answer,” says Ghostface who then adds, “Then you should know Jason’s mother, Mrs. Voorhees, was the original killer. Jason didn’t show up until the sequel!” (This cracks me up because he’s hilariously wrong, too; unless you run with the notion that Jason’s F13 appearance is in a dream).

All of us should know Jason Voorhees’ mythology – that he’s a “mongoloid” seeking revenge for the death of his mother in the first Friday the 13th. He eventually dons a hockey mask and is known for wielding a machete.

Now, those of you who have seen Scream (if you haven’t, shame on you), you know that the film ends with a shocking reveal: that Ghostface is actually two boys (Billy and Stuart, played by Matthew Lillard and Skeet Ulrich, respectively), working harmoniously at tormenting Sidney Prescot (Neve Campbell).

In yesterday’s piece, Blotevogel went on to say that “Scream ” is “sort of a reinvention while also paying homage.” Could it be possible that the new series utilizes the infamous Friday the 13th question from Craven’s 1996 film, and plugs it in as foreshadowing as to who the killers are?

Does this mean that the new Ghostface killers will be both a mongoloid teenager (wearing a mask) and his mother in what could be an epic homage to Friday the 13th?

Thoughts?

Horror movie fanatic who co-founded Bloody Disgusting in 2001. Producer on Southbound, V/H/S/2/3/94, SiREN, Under the Bed, and A Horrible Way to Die. Chicago-based. Horror, pizza and basketball connoisseur. Taco Bell daily. Franchise favs: Hellraiser, Child's Play, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Scream and Friday the 13th. Horror 365 days a year.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading