Editorials
Open Letter to Paramount: Make a Damn ‘Friday the 13th’ Already!
Dear Paramount,
As of this past Monday, February the 13th, it has officially been eight long years since a new Friday the 13th graced the screens of hometown multiplexes. It’s also been four years since you, Paramount, regained the rights to the Friday franchise with intent to “fast track” a sequel’s production. Well, here we are. News and rumors have swirled around Jason’s potential return to the big screen. We’ve had amazingly talented screenwriters attached, a couple of promising directors, and numerous concepts have been bandied about: found footage, origin story, no Jason, and Camp Crystal Lake…IN THE SNOW!
None of these, except maybe the winter setting, have been met with any real excitement by the fans. You know, those people who would actually show up on opening weekend? Yeah, those guys. Despite the meager enthusiasm, a lot of us would still be there, hoping that this would be the one. All wishing this Friday the 13th would return us to our childhoods, leave us feeling that amazing mixture of giddy and terrified, yelling at the screen. However, with each morsel you let slip, Paramount, you were quick to snap it right back up. Delay. Delay. Delay. That’s the word of the day…er, past four years.
Why is that? A lot of the news we heard regarded the script. “The script’s not finished.” A series of films built around a hulking undead killer with a big machete hacking up horny teens is NOT what one might call “hard to crack”. What I mean is, just film a damn Friday the 13th already! What’s worse, we were so close. We, the fans and you, Paramount, were so close to sealing the deal. Whether it sucked or not, it was coming. We would finally be able to judge for ourselves.
‘Rings’ Should Have No Bearing on ‘Friday the 13th’

So what happened? Rings? Seriously? Now, I happen to love The Ring and upon its release it was a massive success, actually pulling in MORE money in its second weekend thanks to strong word of mouth. That’s fantastic performance for what was an original property in the eyes of most Americans. Then The Ring Two was released. While it still made money, it wasn’t as successful as the first, and that’s okay. Sequels rarely out perform their originals. The problem with The Ring Two is most people didn’t care for it. Flash forward to a couple weeks ago and Rings was unleashed upon the world to mediocre numbers.
This film, the one rumored to have affected the 13th Friday’s greenlight, is one you appeared to have no faith in to begin with. You shoved Rings aside, moved it around, perhaps you tweaked and reworked it until it was unrecognizable from its original conception. Who knows? What we do know is that you somehow spent $25 – $33 million dollars (that did not end up on the screen) for a sequel that most people weren’t asking for. I’m sure in addition to that bloated budget there was a hefty marketing spend, what with all those fun prank videos and ads running during every commercial break. As of this writing, the film stands at a $20 million domestic gross and $50 mil worldwide.
You said, “Oh, fuck! Rings didn’t perform. This whole Jason thing is a bad idea.” The problem here is that your audience for Rings IS NOT the same audience you would pull in for a Friday film. I’m going to let you in on a secret. I know this is something some in Hollywood are unaware of, but there is not one lump pile of “horror fans”. We have varying interests. That said, there are certain properties that carry a substantial cache within the horror community. Jason has a legacy, especially here in the states, Samara doesn’t hold a flickering flame to. Yet, at the end of the day, money talks loudest.
So, Let’s Talk Money

The American Ring franchise has pulled in a total of $221 million dollars ($280 adjusted for inflation) domestically. That’s nothing to sneeze at, and of course, they tend to play well overseas. The Friday series has raked in over $380 million. Now, considering most of those titles were released in the 80’s, the adjusted for inflation (further presented as “adj.”) amount is a massive $720 million. The two most recent Fridays (’09 and Freddy vs Jason) both had opening weekends in the 40 million range. So, judging the likely success of a new Friday off the presumed failure of Rings and its $13 million opening, a completely different type of horror film (remember? different types and different fans?) and a much less popular IP, is…for lack of a better word, dumb.
So, let’s assume, though, that your fear of financial lukewarm-iness is correct. The adj. average opening weekend of all 12 films in the F13 franchise is around $21 mil. That’s not mega bucks, but it takes into consideration films released when opening weekend numbers were not the end all-be all for a film’s box office. We can make a safe assumption that Friday could warrant at least $20 million minimum opening weekend (though I feel it would be closer to $40). Let’s assume that that 20 million is going to represent 30% total domestic box office gross for the film, which leaves us with a total of $66.6 million at the end of its box office run (again, this is worse case scenario). How do you make your money back? It’s simple.
The budget does not need to be in the $20+ million dollar range. That’s absurd. It’s as absurd as the amount of money “spent” on Rings. The original F13 films were punk rock. They were the red-headed stepchild of Hollywood. You weren’t necessarily happy about them, but they made you money. Therefore, you cranked out a new entry yearly like clockwork. Filmmakers were set free to turn in a slasher for fans and a product for you. After a 2017 that has included a well publicized loss from Monster Trucks, you need Friday the 13th back on your slate! To reignite that punk rock spirit, set a young and hungry filmmaker loose. Throw $2 million at the film and see what happens. $2 million? Yep, that’s all it would take. You need to adopt an indie mindset. Take a cast of unknowns, a non union director, a four week shoot in a state that offers decent tax incentives, and you’re sitting on a potential gold mine.
Let’s use Alabama as an example. It’s a perfect setting (after all, this is where Part VII was shot). The current tax incentive is 25% on total production costs, only putting you in the hole for 1.5 million. Furthermore, any portion of the budget spent towards filling positions with AL residents will land you another 35% towards their salaries. Let’s assume cast/crew make up 60% of our budget (1.2 mil) and we fill those roles with a minimum of half local AL residents. You can chop another $210 thousand off your risk. There’s also additional savings to be had with tax exempt status towards lodging and food. That 2 million dollar investment just keeps getting whittled down, doesn’t it?
How to ‘Crack’ It

You probably also thought of Rings’ failure, “The horror audience isn’t interested in revisiting the origins of their big screen boogeymen. We need to pull the plug!” You happen to be right there, actually. We really don’t want a friggin’ origin, but in the name of Voorhees we would’ve swallowed it anyway. Here’s your chance to get it right! A down and dirty Friday that focuses on inventive, memorable kills and does things slightly different by presenting likable characters and a strong final girl to rival the greats is all that’s needed to breath life into the series. Forget the damn gimmicks! No “in space”, no Goes to Hell. Those films are fine on their own right, but besides fans not being too pleased by them – the general public is turned off by gimmicky entries in the genre as well. Yes, Jason is a big enough name that the general public will turn out to see what he’s up to. They see, woods, hockey mask, machete, and think, “cool.”
Why? Because unlike Samara Morgan, Jason Voorhees is a bonafide screen legend. Small children don’t know what The Ring is, let alone, “what is a VCR?” I bet, though, if you showed them a photo of a brute in a hockey mask they would turn and run the other way. But, after all that time trying to hammer down a script, what’re you going to do now? You can’t go back to square one. Well, remember, F13 aren’t hard to crack.
I present you a simple concept. The memory of Jason has faded. He’s merely an urban legend whispered about around camp fires. A group of friends, escaping for a weekend of camping and fun, mistakenly stumble upon the decrepit remains of Camp Crystal Lake and decide to crash in one of the cabins when a massive storm breaks out. The story unravels in almost realtime during one night, trapped in the surroundings of Camp Blood. There’d be a couple more kinks in the plot to keep things feeling “fresh”, but that’s it. That’s all you need! A simple set up, likable characters, and again…inventive kills and gnarly practical effects. Best part, all of this is feasible on our shoestring budget! Hell, I’ll even write the damn script over a long weekend for 10k and a bottle of wine (preferably a nice red, but I’ll settle for some Mondavi Select).
To ensure maximum profit, you would keep your marketing spend to a minimum. The great thing is that a F13 film done right will sell itself. That’s right! There’s no need to have Jason show up on “The Today Show”! Though, that would be pretty cool. Follow the lead set by A24 and their advertising for The Witch. Don’t throw dollars around willy-nilly. Focus your advertising online, where it counts, with the people who are actually going to see your film. Ma and Pa Average-Joe aren’t going to be interested when the TV spot pops up during “Live! With Kelly”…so, why waste the money?
All We Need is ‘Voorhees’

Ultimately, the Friday the 13th films have taken on an almost mythic, ritualistic quality. They exist beyond the movies themselves. Much like the fantastic Cabin in the Woods showed us, these films exist to fit a need deep within. In a chaotic world that grows more and more fractured by the day, we need our boogeymen now more than ever. Fear is all around us in the real world. For at least an hour and a half, we need to be able to enter the comforting confines of a darkened theater only to have the shit “safely” scared out of us. For in a movie, within Jason, we can exorcise our fears and frustrations. We can become the final girl, victorious. We can slay the monster.
The choice is yours, Paramount. I’m not naive enough to think you’ll take any of this into consideration. But, if you’re ready to not only make some cash but shake up the industry – take a miniscule financial risk. There’s still time for a quickie turnaround in order to make that October 13th date. Put some small indie style into that big studio mentality of yours.
Sincerely,
Zachary Paul
Editorials
Taking a Closer Look at the ‘Christmas Carol’ Ghosts of Ti West’s ‘Ebenezer’
The trailer for Ti West’s upcoming adaptation of A Christmas Carol raised a lot of eyebrows when it dropped earlier this week. While plenty of folks initially dismissed Ebenezer as a derivative project meant to cash in on the recent wave of unnecessary prequels that expand the backstory of beloved characters (such as 2023’s Wonka), Charles Dickens’ original novel already made a point of exploring Ebenezer Scrooge’s origins in detail – meaning that this new film is likely just a particularly faithful adaptation of the source material under a different name.
Couple that with the fact that the movie is being helmed by a genuine horror auteur and I think it’s safe to say that the latest iteration of the first modern ghost story is in good hands.
That being said, one detail that immediately jumped out at me during the brief teaser (other than a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it nod to Johnny Depp’s iconic bedroom death scene from the original A Nightmare on Elm Street) is the fact that many of Ebenezer’s ghosts appear to have been directly lifted from the iconic John Leech illustrations that accompanied the first edition of Dickens’ novel.
Here are a couple of stills from the trailer compared to the original artwork:

The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’

The Phantoms in ‘A Christmas Carol’ and ‘Ebenezer’

Marley’s Ghost in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’
Mainly working with old-school wood and steel engravings that would later be transferred to print, Leech was instrumental in crafting the iconic look of history’s most influential phantoms – especially since Dickens is said to have been deeply involved with the creation of these so-called “comic illustrations.”
And since the novel is commonly said to have popularized spiritualism in Victorian England, much of the ghostly iconography that we still see in genre media to this very day (including some of Ti West’s previous films) can be traced back to the author’s partnership with Leech.
Ebenezer won’t be the first A Christmas Carol adaptation to borrow heavily from these designs, but I can appreciate how Ti West is incorporating an important part of horror history into his latest film.
Ebenezer will be available in theaters starting November 13.

You must be logged in to post a comment.