Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Mothman Prophecies’ – Cosmic Cryptozoology Horror Movie Is Still Thrilling 20 Years Later

Published

on

Mothman Prophecies

Cryptozoology is woefully underexplored in popular culture. Sure, we have a handful of entertaining bigfoot flicks and even Zak Penn and Werner Herzog’s experimental Incident at Loch Ness, but where’s our big budget Jersey Devil thrillers? Or how about some Chupacabra-related mysteries? Having grown up on a steady diet of late-night Discovery Channel and questionable internet forums, I’d argue that this popular pseudoscience is an untapped goldmine of compelling genre stories that deserve more attention.

Fortunately, my personal favorite of these preternatural beings was lucky enough to spawn a surprisingly successful motion picture in the form of Mark Pellington’s The Mothman Prophecies, a 2002 adaptation of John Keel’s homonymous book describing an allegedly true story from 1960s West Virginia. And with the flick celebrating two decades of conspiratorial frights, I think that this is the perfect time to look back on why it’s still the best cryptozoological thriller that flirts with both psychological drama and cosmic horror.

While Keel’s book was originally released back in 1975, the legend of the Mothman really achieved worldwide notoriety with the rise of online paranormal discussion boards in the 90s. With more and more people spreading and adding to the creature’s bizarre history, it was only a matter of time until a studio decided to invest in a spec script based on Keel’s original account, eventually leading to the production of Lakeshore Entertainment’s film.

Unfortunately, the studio was unsure about how general audiences might react to a high-concept cryptid mystery and ended up slashing the original budget just a few days before filming began. This unexpected act of cinematic sabotage came as a shock to Pellington, who had already dealt with similar issues on his previous picture, but these limitations may have led to storytelling concessions that ultimately benefited the picture. Without a massive special effects budget, the titular Mothman became more of a creepy presence than a physical monster, only appearing in near-subliminal visions as the finished film focused more on atmosphere and character work rather than the cryptozoological chills of the original book.

Mothman Prophecies Richard Gere

“Whatever brought you there, brought you there to die.”

In fact, the director purposely avoided a faithful adaptation of Keel’s account, wanting the film to feel more like a psychological drama instead of an investigative creature feature or traditional sci-fi flick. Ironically, this is more in line with the writer’s overall feelings about UFO phenomena in general, as, despite theorizing that the Mothman was an “ultraterrestrial” visitor, Keel thought that most supernatural incidents could be explained by psychic anomalies rather than otherworldly interference.

This more grounded approach led to quite a few discrepancies between the film and its source material, such as the altered visuals of the Mothman itself and the protagonist’s characterization as a skeptic rather than a paranormal investigator (not to mention the condensing of characters and events in order to better fit a two-hour drama). Despite this, the overall plot remains largely intact, with Richard Gere playing a grieving journalist named John Klein who mysteriously finds himself lost in the Appalachian city of Point Pleasant. He eventually discovers that locals have been dealing with a series of seemingly paranormal occurrences and becomes obsessed with the elusive Mothman, who he believes is involved with a series of prophetic messages warning of impending disasters.

While I would still love to see a more traditional monster flick that explores the bizarre accounts present in the original book, Pellington’s choice to explore the human side of the story makes The Mothman Prophecies a surprisingly somber and existential picture that characterizes the titular monster as an unexplainable force representing a universal fear of the unknown, taking the legend into a more metaphysical direction than most other interpretations.

From the Pazuzu-like flashes of the Mothman during pivotal scenes to subtle scares like Klein’s reflection not quite matching up with his movements, as well as characters being driven to madness and obsession after coming into contact with the red-eyed creature, there are several moments of the picture that would feel right at home in an H.P. Lovecraft yarn. The scenes featuring Indrid Cold’s fatal prophecies (brought to life by Pellington himself) are especially haunting, with these implied offscreen terrors becoming much scarier than any monstrous visuals that a special effects team could have cooked up.

“You’re more advanced than a cockroach, have you ever tried explaining yourself to one of them?”

Of course, it’s the emotional core of The Mothman Prophecies that really ties everything together. Pellington grounds these paranormal incidents in tangible emotions like grief, love and existential dread, leading to an eerily believable trek through deeply human fears. Gere is also phenomenal as our leading man, making it easy to root for our haunted protagonist. Honestly, I think it’s a shame that the actor hasn’t shown up in more horror movies, as he excels in this role as a rational man losing his wits once he’s confronted with the unknown.

The Mothman itself is only briefly featured in this subtly scary experience, but the creature’s presence is felt throughout every frame of the picture. It may not be the cryptid creature feature that some were hoping for, but I appreciate this unconventional retelling of a fascinating legend. The film is also responsible for popularizing the Mothman as a cultural icon, with Point Pleasant organizing an official Mothman Festival every year since 2002 as the mysterious winged monster became a staple of American folklore alongside figures like the Jackalope and Sasquatch.

While the film’s claims that it’s based on a true story should be taken with a sizable grain of salt, I think The Mothman Prophecies is still a surprisingly thrilling and highly atmospheric mystery twenty years later. It can get a little slow at times and might irk hardcore cryptozoology enthusiasts with its disregard for Keel’s (admittedly exaggerated) account, but I’d still recommend it to any fan of moody cosmic horror. It’s also the best media featuring West Virginia since John Denver’s Country Roads, and definitely my personal favorite Richard Gere flick.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading