Quantcast
Connect with us

Movies

Pontypool (limited)

“While PONTYPOOL is a thought-provoking and suspenseful film, some of the flaws will really take the audience out of the movie.”

Published

on

Canadian director Bruce McDonald is back with a new thriller entitled PONTYPOOL, which premiered at this year’s Toronto International Film Festival. While carrying an interesting premise, the film suffers from some poor acting and lack of production value.

In the film, a disgruntled radio DJ named Grant Mazzy (Stephen McHattie) starts off his first day of work in the middle of a snowstorm. He’s used to chatting up action and controversial topics, not the tame, small town reporting that goes on over at CLSY Radio in Pontypool, Ontario. He butts head immediately with Producer Sydney Briar (Lisa Houle), while assistant Laurel Ann (Georgina Reilly) kind of digs the variety. As Mazzy is finally starting to accept his situation, an interesting report comes in – a mob has attacked a local hospital. The story builds from the sanctuary of the radio station as things become more and more bizarre – it appears that the mob is infected, and eating people. There’s a virus spreading, and it’s not from being bitten, it’s from speaking the English language…

While the premise sounds completely implausible, writer Tony Burgess takes careful precautions in never confirming the validity of the claim. It’s only a theory being thrown around the radio station, and although it sounds ridiculous, it’s quite a compelling scenario. How could such a think happen? Is it God punishing man? Why is only the English language? Many questions arise and none are answered, which is to the films advantage. Some of the most thrilling films in history come from a lack of explanation and that’s the direction PONTYPOOL takes.

Other than the opening of the film, the entire movie takes place in the radio station. One of the most interesting aspects of the film is how McDonald creates space in a seemingly claustrophobic situation. While it looks like one small room, somehow the audience is taken to various places in various angles, which relieve some of the uncomfortable tension. The real magic, though, comes from star Stephen McHattie.

McHattie literally carries the entire movie on his shoulders. PONTYPOOL is exposition heavy as most of the film consists of McHattie on the radio reporting and interviewing. The entire outside world is created through his words. McHattie and the audience work together as he creates the world and our imagination takes over. In essence, the audience’s imagination can determine a huge portion of the entertainment value. It’s unfortunate that Dr. Mendez (Hrant Alianak) comes into the picture, as his overacting and ludicrous persona will immediately remove the audience from the film. In a seemingly important and serious situation, this idiotic doctor comes in and makes a believable film an instant B-movie.

Another downfall of the film is the production value. While the film is directed wonderfully, I found the cinematography to be poor. It looked cheap and small; maybe the set designer should be blamed as well?

While PONTYPOOL is a thought-provoking and suspenseful film, some of the flaws will really take the audience out of the movie. McDonald shows experience in his direction and can sit back proud knowing he was able to pull together a seriously difficult device, even though one can argue that the lack of explanation is a just a copout. PONTYPOOL will leave you with many questions, but the most important one will be, “how much did you enjoy it?”

Editorials

3 Found Footage Bonus Features That Were Better Than the Movie

Published

on

Found Footage Bonus Features

Hollywood tends to learn all of the wrong lessons when confronted with an indie success story that doesn’t follow the established rules of the industry. For instance, instead of accepting that the massive success of Backrooms has more to do with Kane Parsons’ individual talent as an established artist who has been producing high-quality videos since the pandemic (combined with the popularity of liminal horror among younger audiences), producers are now trudging through old Reddit posts looking for the next viral meme that studios think might have the potential to be turned into a cash cow.

This is by no means a new phenomenon, and I think one of the most pertinent examples of Hollywood misunderstanding what makes a movie work has to be the aftermath of The Blair Witch Project. While Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez’s genre-defining movie proved that POV camerawork and lo-fi aesthetics can captivate mainstream audiences when backed by a genuinely compelling story, there was a sudden trend of filmmakers attempting to appear hip by incorporating found footage into their films as if the occasional presence of diegetic recordings was enough to make a movie seem “hip”.

That’s why the 2000s were such a frustrating period for found footage fans, as the genre was still mostly relegated to obscure indie productions while studios only teased us with the format’s narrative potential. And yet, talented filmmakers can tell compelling stories under any circumstances, and this is how we get to the weird world of found footage bonus features produced alongside traditional movies.

Diegetic filmmaking may not necessarily be easier than conventional camerawork (it’s a lot harder to simulate reality without the added toolbox of cinematic editing), but it’s certainly a hell of a lot cheaper. That’s why it makes sense that plenty of high profile projects invested in found footage bonus content in order to add value to their home video releases – a once profitable industry that is sorely missed in the current media landscape.

The irony here is that many of these found footage extras were a little too good when compared to their promotional origins. With that in mind, I’d like to take a closer look at three examples of found footage bonus features that were better than the movie they were meant to enhance!


3. Halloween: Resurrection (2002): WebCam Special

I might lose some of my horror cred for admitting this, but Halloween: Resurrection was actually the first Halloween film I ever saw. Thankfully, this misguided entry didn’t scare me off from watching the other movies in the series, but even as a teenager I recognized that the flick’s premise of an online streaming show gone wrong had some merit to it – it’s just too bad that these ideas were never fully realized in the feature itself.

It was only years later that I discovered the fabled WebCam Special on Resurrection’s physical media release and got the film I had always wanted. This 41-minute cut of the film is by no means a masterpiece, but excluding everything except for the found footage elements of the production somehow transforms this ill-advised sequel into a deeply unsettling exercise in voyeuristic cinema.

In fact, I’d argue that the long takes of Michael simply moving through the house without calling attention to himself are much closer to John Carpenter’s original vision of the bogeyman than any of the exaggerated sequels that depict The Shape as something more akin to a superpowered Jason Voorhees. It’s just a shame that the franchise would never explore this format again.


2. Believers (2007): The Quanta Group Videos

Daniel Myrick’s Believers is by no means a bad movie, with this direct-to-video thriller following a duo of paramedics who find themselves captured by a deranged death cult inspired by all the worst aspects of Jonestown and Heaven’s Gate. Unfortunately, the Blair Witch alumni’s low-budget exploration of religious madness was quickly forgotten simply because most people didn’t bother to engage with the other half of the experience by exploring the DVD menu.

Within the disc’s extras, Myrick actually included in-universe interviews and orientation videos meant to expand the Quanta Group’s backstory and beliefs. These found footage recordings greatly enhance The Believers by providing much-needed context for some of the film’s scariest moments. There’s even a wonderfully creepy epilogue sequence here as another group explores the cult’s dilapidated compound after the events of the film.

While it’s baffling that this material didn’t make it into the movie itself through in-universe cutaways (especially IO’s darkly humorous interview), watching it alongside Myrick’s film turns the whole thing into a highly compelling multi-media experience.


1. Dawn of the Dead (2004): The Lost Tape & Special Report: Zombie Invasion

I’ve always considered 2004’s Dawn of the Dead remake to be Zack Snyder’s best film (though most of the flick’s qualities are the result of James Gunn’s excellent script) even if it fails to capture the social anxieties of Romero’s 1978 original. However, this apocalyptic production is also the perfect example of an expensive project being overshadowed by the low-budget bonus features on its own home video release.

You see, the Dawn of the Dead DVD actually boasts two separate found footage short films that I find much scarier than the movie they’re marketing. The Lost Tape: Andy’s Terrifying Last Days Revealed is a somber video diary written by Gunn and starring Bruce Bohne as the ill-fated Andy – a minor character in the main film who becomes trapped in his own gun store when the zombies attack. Then there’s my personal favorite, Special Report: Zombie Invasion, a fully simulated news program starring Babylon 5’s Richard Biggs (as well as Bruce Boxleitner) that chronicles the spread of the undead virus.

Not only do these bonus features add context to Snyder’s film, but I’d argue that they make for a better standalone viewing experience than the so-called “main attraction”. Special Report honestly feels like a charming low-budget adaptation of Max Brooks’ World War Z novel (despite coming out a couple of years before that book was published), and I adore how The Lost Tapes turns Andy into a genuinely tragic figure.


These obviously aren’t the only found footage extras worth revisiting (for instance, I adore that Skull Island mockumentary that accompanied the special edition of Peter Jackson’s King Kong remake), but I figured that the three aforementioned projects could provide us with a snapshot of a curious moment in popular culture where found footage could still impress viewers despite not being quite as respected by the studio system.

That being said, don’t forget to sound off in the comments below if you can think of any other found footage bonus features that deserve a shout-out! After all, I’d love to see this trend of diegetic extras make a comeback in modern times – especially where found footage-heavy movies like Backrooms are concerned.

Continue Reading