Quantcast
Connect with us

Movies

Mimic

“Although this version of ‘Mimic’ is labeled a director’s cut, the same painful inertia infiltrates the proceedings once the bug hunt takes a breather. The reworking is moderately flavorful, yet doesn’t erase the inherent problems of the picture; it’s still a botched pass at creating a distinctive threat in a film landscape that’s seen it all. ‘Mimic’ is something of a bore, but there’s plenty of screen spookery to scrutinize courtesy of Guillermo del Toro, who couldn’t make a visually tedious movie if he tried. Enthralling acts of drama? Those always seems to elude him, but when it comes to imagining monster cockroaches on the prowl in New York City, there’s nobody more qualified for the job.”

Published

on

Mimic was filmmaker Guillermo del Toro’s Hollywood baptism, his entrance into the complex nature of the industry big leagues. Sure, the Mexican director proved himself an exceptional horror conductor with 1993’s Cronos, but that was hometown kitten play, barely seen by American audiences at the time. 1997’s Mimic was the show, introducing the visionary master of the macabre to his worst nightmare: The Weinstein Brothers. Forget giant cockroaches and Jeremy Northam’s substandard acting, the real fright was found behind the scenes, as Dimension Films attempted to break del Toro’s creative spirit like so many filmmakers before him. They picked on the wrong Mexican. However, Mimic, with its prolonged tedium, came awfully close to tarnishing the creator’s name for good.

A plague has ravaged America’s youth, requiring the services of CDC scientist Dr. Peter Mann (Jeremy Northam) and entomologist Dr. Susan Tyler (Mira Sorvino) to help investigate the spread of doom, searching for a cure. Their effort to decimate the cockroach population of New York City is successful, creating a special “Judas Breed” bug to help obliterate the threat. Built for temporary use, these pesky lab creations begin to show signs of survival long after their intended demise, forcing Susan and Peter back into action, hunting for answers while bodies start to pile up across the city. Assisted by Josh (Josh Brolin), a detective, and Leonard (Charles Dutton), a transit cop, the team heads underground for a bug quest, only to find a threat far greater than imagined, with a terrifying ability to mimic their new source of food: humans.

Despite only being his second directorial effort, Mimic carries all the birthmarks and dark magic that have come to define Guillermo del Toro’s twisted career. There’s a shockingly cohesive visual design to enjoy here, filled with goopy, textured encounters and meticulous insect investigation (rooted in scientific authenticity), set against a grungy cityscape of perpetual menace and infinite subterranean habitats. Mimic is appealing to study in full, which is always the case with a del Toro picture. However, this darkly gorgeous effort is especially compelling, playing as both a monster movie featuring the wrath of human-sized cockroaches and a journey of movie science, with furrow-browed actors hunched over amber lighting, examining creepy creatures to ascertain the trouble clicking ahead. It’s a brilliantly produced movie, extending to the successful mix of practical critters with crude CGI, kept in the dark long enough to pass. The effort is all there on the screen.

While the film’s visual scope is always intriguing, the performances nearly sink the entire production. Handed a cast of Weinstein-approved actors, del Toro slips into survival mode, permitting the lackluster talent plenty of room to clomp around undisturbed while he works on the insane background details of the piece. It’s directorial apathy a blind man could perceive, especially with Northam, who’s completely vacant here as the voice of science, never conveying a drop of a personality behind his bookish glasses. Sorvino is almost as painfully blank, showing awkwardness with the film’s overt genre intensity, looking more confused by the director’s attention to scares then enlivened by the horror potential of the piece. The acting is dreadful at times, a cancer that spreads to the script, which stops the movie dead midway through the descent to simplify the scale of the picture, pitting our heroes against the Judas legion inside a cramped subway car, turning the second half of the movie into a routine survival event with a hefty grip on irony (humans turned into insects) but offering surprisingly little tension.

THE BLU-RAY

Visual:

The AVC encoded image (2.39:1 aspect ratio) presentation displays a substantial urgency with crush issues, solidifying blacks during low-lit sequences, puling details out of set design and hair density. This is part of del Toro’s vision for the Director’s Cut, but there’s surplus impenetrability happening here. Clarity is quite good when lit, displaying a hearty sense of emotion from the cast, with appealing textures on faces, while the creature moist nuances are also well preserved. Color is impressive, offering confident greens and amber glow, though the film basically holsters its hues for the second half showdown.

Audio:

The 7.1 DTS-HD MA sound mix contains insane directional activity, utilizing the soundstage wonderfully as the bugs crawl around the room, upping in sonic intensity as the violence increases. Dialogue is well maintained and heavy, feeling out an echoed quality when matters dive underground. Scoring is hearty but rarely disruptive, finding a nice balance with verbal interactions. Atmospherics are generous, while low-end is responsive, kicking up in during attack sequences.

Subtitles:

English, English SDH, and Spanish subtitles are offered.

Extras:

Video Prologue with Director Guillermo del Toro (1:05) is brief introduction to the BD contents, with the filmmaker promising to share all he legally can about the process.

Audio Commentary with Guillermo del Toro is a corker of a conversation, a perfect opportunity for the creator to explain his complex feelings about his “imperfect child.” Balancing screen-specific study with considerable BTS recollections, del Toro paints a portrait of creative frustration, where his place in the film’s production was reduced to meet the demands of the producers. It’s not a mopey track of woe-is-me worry, but a refreshingly truthful (within certain legal boundaries), headfirst journey into the reality of a young filmmaker rubbing the moneymen the wrong way. The commentary is sharp, focused, and hungry to illuminate the struggles and pleasures of Mimic, with del Toro refusing sourpuss invitations to remain positive about his impediments.

Reclaiming Mimic (14:31) returns to the director, who clarifies his feelings about the work and the opportunity he had to fine-tune a feature he made as a young man. There’s an explanation of screen changes, pointing out their thematic intentions, but this conversation is primarily devoted to del Toro’s feelings about the creation of horror, finding his flowing sensibilities blocked by a studio that demanded he play by “the rules” of the genre.

A Leap in Evolution: The Creatures of Mimic (9:35) captures the effort to blend science with realism, interviewing the creature design team to better understand how the bugs were created and manipulated on-set.

Back into the Tunnels (5:22) returns to 1996, observing a baby-faced del Toro guide his cast and crew on the set of Mimic. It’s a promotional featurette, but there’s tremendous entertainment value in seeing BTS footage and pre-release conversations.

Deleted Scenes (5:11) offer a direct revelation of pregnancy for Susan and Peter, supply an unfinished bug attack on Susan, and serve up a slight variation on the ending.

Storyboard Animatics (6:04) provide the planning stages for six major action and suspense sequences.

Gag Reel (2:20) is a slickly edited assembly of mix-em-ups, highlighting a lip-licking montage that finds most of the cast in need of Blistex.

A Theatrical Trailer has not been included.

FINAL THOUGHTS

Although this version of Mimic is labeled a director’s cut, the same painful inertia infiltrates the proceedings once the bug hunt takes a breather. The reworking is moderately flavorful, yet doesn’t erase the inherent problems of the picture; it’s still a botched pass at creating a distinctive threat in a film landscape that’s seen it all. Mimic is something of a bore, but there’s plenty of screen spookery to scrutinize courtesy of Guillermo del Toro, who couldn’t make a visually tedious movie if he tried. Enthralling acts of drama? Those always seems to elude him, but when it comes to imagining monster cockroaches on the prowl in New York City, there’s nobody more qualified for the job.

Click to comment

Editorials

Taking a Closer Look at the ‘Christmas Carol’ Ghosts of Ti West’s ‘Ebenezer’

Published

on

The trailer for Ti West’s upcoming adaptation of A Christmas Carol raised a lot of eyebrows when it dropped earlier this week. While plenty of folks initially dismissed Ebenezer as a derivative project meant to cash in on the recent wave of unnecessary prequels that expand the backstory of beloved characters (such as 2023’s Wonka), Charles Dickens’ original novel already made a point of exploring Ebenezer Scrooge’s origins in detail – meaning that this new film is likely just a particularly faithful adaptation of the source material under a different name.

Couple that with the fact that the movie is being helmed by a genuine horror auteur and I think it’s safe to say that the latest iteration of the first modern ghost story is in good hands.

That being said, one detail that immediately jumped out at me during the brief teaser (other than a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it nod to Johnny Depp’s iconic bedroom death scene from the original A Nightmare on Elm Street) is the fact that many of Ebenezer’s ghosts appear to have been directly lifted from the iconic John Leech illustrations that accompanied the first edition of Dickens’ novel.

Here are a couple of stills from the trailer compared to the original artwork:

The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’

The Phantoms in ‘A Christmas Carol’ and ‘Ebenezer’

Marley’s Ghost in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’

Mainly working with old-school wood and steel engravings that would later be transferred to print, Leech was instrumental in crafting the iconic look of history’s most influential phantoms – especially since Dickens is said to have been deeply involved with the creation of these so-called “comic illustrations.”

And since the novel is commonly said to have popularized spiritualism in Victorian England, much of the ghostly iconography that we still see in genre media to this very day (including some of Ti West’s previous films) can be traced back to the author’s partnership with Leech.

Ebenezer won’t be the first A Christmas Carol adaptation to borrow heavily from these designs, but I can appreciate how Ti West is incorporating an important part of horror history into his latest film.

Ebenezer will be available in theaters starting November 13.

Continue Reading