Reviews
[Comic Book Review] “POP” #2 Is A Powerful Expression
Reading “POP” by Curt Pires is like taking a culture studies class your freshman year taught by a disillusioned grad student who has a ponytail, drinks a lot of coffee, and says the word “Sheeple” a lot. Your freshly expanded mind will be immediately drawn to his bleak outlook on society, and you’ll quickly begin to adopt his animosity toward the corporate machine’s homogenization of art and the death of meaningful creativity in the age of marketing campaigns and pop culture by committee and product placement and like him you’ll seethe with disdain for the monetization of everything that used to mean anything. You’ll eat that shit up. I read “Pop” with one hand on my pitchfork and I love every second of it.
WRITTEN BY: Curt Pires
ART BY: Jason Copland
PUBLISHER: Dark Horse
PRICE: $3.99
RELEASE: September 24, 2014
Reviewed By Eric Switzer
“POP” #2 has got to have the coolest cover on shelves today. I say this because #1 had a really incredible cover, and I wonder how the four of them would look framed together on a wall in my living room next to a mass produced black-and-white Tyler Durden. The irony is not lost on me.
So Coop is still trying to figure out who Elle is and they have a run in with the Cartel while doing DMT in the woods and it looks like they might get caught but they escape just in time and there is a car chase and a pretty cool fight scene with the biker chick…
If you are reading “POP” then you know the book isn’t a huge standout because of the plot, but rather the tone. I read “POP” for the angst. I read “POP” to get angry. I read “POP” because it reminds me of a time when there was nothing worse than being a sellout and The Man wanted to crush my soul. Sometimes I wonder if he did, because you grow up and you get a job and you aren’t as worried about the things you used to think were life and death. You grow up and assimilate more and more the shortcoming in our culture don’t get to you as much, you don’t notice them or they don’t bother you. “POP” doesn’t let you forget. “POP” is here to remind you that the bullshit hasn’t gone away. The players have changed but the game stays the same. “POP” is a call to action.
It isn’t perfect, and it shouldn’t be. “Perfect” art is a Cheerios commercial. Its a Starbucks billboard. “POP” is an expression. Curt and Jason are exposing themselves, trying to expose some truth. The work is personal yet global. The message isn’t always clear or consistent, metaphors are a little mixed, but it starts the conversation. I don’t think “POP” has all the answers, it isn’t a new bible. But it makes me angry, and I really like that.
Reviews
‘The Mouths’ Review: Takashi Shimizu’s Cursed Tree Horror Stumbles at the Finish [Fantasia 2026]
Director Takashi Shimizu’s latest, The Mouths, has a pretty straightforward premise: what if an enormous, threatening tree at the edge of a cemetery contained a killer curse? Touch it, make a wish, and let the horror begin.
As fans of Shimizu’s work know, it’s never quite so straightforward. The Japanese director, best known for the Ju-on films, delights in non-linear narratives and haunting specters. In this capacity, The Mouths more or less adheres to formula.
The screenplay was written by Masahiro Yamaura and adapts Sesuji’s novella A Questionnaire About the Mouth. The source material provides a framing device that opens the film before it is swiftly forgotten, only to return in the film’s closing moments in highly amusing fashion.
In between, the film tells the story of four friends who investigate an urban legend of a cursed tree, including soft-spoken Shota (Rihito Itagaki), sensitive Mirei (Momona Kasahara), outgoing Ann (Ai Yoshikawa), and her boastful boyfriend Tatsuya (Keito Tsuna).
Initially, the action seems straightforward: the four teens drive to the cemetery, discussing what Shota heard about the tree with a brief pause at a convenience store in between. Throughout all of these early scenes, the interaction among the teens hints at a complicated dynamic, including a minor spat between Ann and Tatsuya, and Shota’s brief but meaningful glance at Ann in the rearview mirror. These sequences are regularly interrupted by direct address police interviews as present-day Shota, Tatsuya, and Mirei make ominous declarations about the events of that evening.

The first act works because The Mouths is slowly building tension around what happened. It’s obvious from their statements that things will go awry, but Yamaura’s script teases things out. Even when they arrive at the cemetery, rather than proceed directly to the cursed object, the action pauses so Shota can propose a specific course of action: they will proceed to the tree, individually, in a specific order. The wait for the action to kick in is both tantalizing and agonizing.
First up: Shota, followed by Tatsuya, then Ann. Mirei, meanwhile, becomes increasingly reticent, which alarms the others who have already noted her sensitivity to otherworldly phenomena.
When Ann disappears, the film moves into a new act as the remaining members of the group search for her while seemingly being haunted by both her and the tree. This is where Shimizu’s penchant for ghostly figures lurking in the background and peeking around corners comes to the forefront, including one stand-out moment that leans into the curse’s origin: the visual of a hanged woman with a grotesquely stretched neck.
The middle stretch feels a little too familiar to the director’s work, however, so it’s exciting when the last act upends much of what we thought we knew. There is a reason that the film is called The Mouths: not only are most of these people revealed to be unreliable narrators, but it is revealed that several interactions throughout the film were manipulated by characters with malicious intent. These people are not quite what they seemed.

This revisionist filter on the events of the movie’s first half is provocative and enticing, though the creative team struggles to execute it without devolving into messy confusion. There’s at least one plot beat that should be a massive revelation, but both the visuals and the dialogue render it quite confusing, which robs the moment of some of its power. This is a shame, because the last act is what makes the film stand out from other curse/ghost movies.
The performances of the main four teens are solid, with Itagaki getting to show the most range. Many of the supporting characters, including a pair of frenemies who also become involved in the curse, as well as the detective investigating the case, feel a bit superfluous; the film would have benefitted from cutting back some of these scenes or, alternately, beefing up a few of these roles to justify their inclusion.
The Mouths’ other big element is its sound design. The area around the tree is surrounded by wet mud that slurps and sucks at shoes, while the cursed bark is covered in cicadas, whose distinctive buzz and crunchy shells provide evocative foley.
Overall, The Mouths is a solid but slightly inessential addition to Shimizu’s filmography. For the auteur’s fans, there’s plenty to appreciate, particularly the way the Japanese master sets up scares and pays them off, including good moments in a library and later when the detective is driving. On the other hand, the film’s big reveal is handled so clumsily that its potency is disappointingly muted.
The Mouths is a decent time, but it’s hard to overlook some of its weaknesses.
The Mouths made its North American premiere at the 2026 Fantasia International Film Festival. Release info TBD.


You must be logged in to post a comment.