Connect with us

Editorials

[Shark Week] ‘SHARK!’ Burt Reynolds Sans Mustache, Movie Sans Shark

Published

on

ID: Shark! (1969)
Length: 1:31
Classification: Action Adventure posing as Animal Attack

It’s Shark Week! and while the last few years of Discovery’s shark themed TV haven’t been the greatest, I still can’t help but get excited. It also gave me an excuse to finally break into a Shark attack DVD pack I bought at a convention a while ago! Sharks are beautifully terrifying creatures that are basically dinosaurs and that’s fucking great!

I started with Shark! for no other reason than it had an exclamation point in it which made me think lots of awesome shark action…and sure enough the film opens up with a diver swimming around until he is surrounded by sharks and torn to shreds and then the explosive title hits the screen, SHARK! 

But that is basically where the shark angle ends and the Indiana Jones/Casablanca story starts. Sam Fuller, famous for Shock Corridor and White Dog, had originally written a screenplay titled  “Caine” based on the book His Bones are Coral by Victor Canning. The  screenplay was always meant to be an action adventure but when Troma  Enterprises got to it they decided to jump on the animal attack  bandwagon. The movie was cut to pieces and so severely re-edited that  Sam Fuller wanted his name off of the thing, he didn’t succeed. But the  strangest thing is, I actually kind of dug it.

The basic premise is the diver at the beginning who was killed was a part  of a trio of treasure hunters who claim to be oceanographers. They hire  the facilities of an extremely young Burt Reynolds and convince him to  dive into shark-infested waters for science! But really, for treasure!  Reynolds gets wise to the game and a very Indiana Jones: Raiders  adventure happens

It was at the 58-minute point where I gave up on ever seeing a second  shark attack in this decidedly mistitled movie I realized I was still having  fun. Burt Reynolds is charming as always and it does hold a Spaghetti Western atmosphere that I appreciated. While Sam Fuller may have disowned the film, as well he should have as it sounds, I could still feel a Fuller touch.

SHARK-010

Unsurprisingly, the picture and sound quality are near VHS quality but I wasn’t expecting much more than that when I bought it. Overall, I was pleasantly surprised by Shark! in its cast and lack of sharkeyness. Though I did get my second shark attack towards the end. Sadly, according to IMDB trivia, one of the stuntmen involved in one of the shark attacks scenes actually was killed because the shark wasn’t properly sedated.

Well, that’s it for Shark! and I encourage you to check it out if you get a chance, try to get a group together! I’ll be back with another discussion on cheesy shark movies.

Poster_of_the_movie_Shark!

Jess is a Northeast Ohio native who has loved all things horror and fringe since birth. She has a tendency to run at the mouth about it and decided writing was the only way not to scare everyone away. If you make a hobby into a career it becomes less creepy. Unless that hobby is collecting baby dolls. Nothing makes that less creepy.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading