Quantcast
Connect with us

Reviews

Sumo Sway Couple Review: Let’s Cuddle

Published

on

I work from home. I sit in a smallish room, typing furiously on my laptop for anywhere between 8-12 hours per day (on a slow day). I answer a ton of emails, I write posts that have to go up immediately, I answer more emails, I write posts that I can schedule for future dates, I answer even more emails, I chat with Brad so that we can strategize and plan exactly how things are going, etc, etc, etc… Basically, I’m working nearly nonstop.

Because I work so much and I do so much typing, I wanted to make sure that I’m sitting comfortably and able to relax a bit. After reading Adam’s many, many reviews for various Sumo products, I asked him if he could recommend a good one for me. One thing led to another and suddenly Sumo is sending me a Sway Couple to review.

Let me state that again in the interest of full disclosure: Sumo has sent me a Sway Couple, which I’m currently lounging in as I write this review. Alright, let’s talk about this bean bag, shall we?

Firstly, this thing is big. Like, damn, I wasn’t expecting it to be this big! It’s a large part of my office and takes up a big portion of one corner. However, there’s not too much going on in my office, so I’m totally cool with how much room it takes up. Besides, comfort gets priority.

Speaking of the size, the Sway Couple is named that because it’s big enough for a couple to share when watching a movie, playing a game, whatever. While I haven’t had the chance to share it with anyone, I can assure you that there’s more than enough room to accommodate two average-sized individuals. I’ll fully admit that I’ve managed to knock out more than a few afternoon naps on this thing.

I have the black suede edition, which feels absolutely divine. Sometimes I’ll find myself rubbing the fabric because it just feels that nice. Or I’ll slide my hand into the side pocket, which is deep enough to store all sorts of little knick knacks, such as controllers, remotes, chargers, magazines, books, etc…

When it comes to cleaning the Sway Couple, it’s very, very easy. I spilled almost a plateful of pearled couscous (it’s delicious, okay?) on it by accident and it wasn’t a big deal at all to grab some paper towel and wipe the food off. No stains, no aroma, no lingering moisture. In fact, after plopping my tuchus on it for hours a day for weeks on end, I can say that the Sway Couple smells nearly perfect (I had to bury my face into where my ass rests to catch any whiff of any body odor) and I wouldn’t have a problem sharing it.

Now, I do have to say that the Sway Couple is not perfect. My main issue with it was that the seat area began to flatten and become misshapen after a while of usage. In the product description it specifically states, “Sway large bean bag chairs stay fluffy and full, will never go flat.” I don’t know if that is meant for people who only sit in it for a few hours at a time but mine definitely went flat in the butt area and I have to fluff it up each time I use it if I want to have some cushioning. Below are pictures that show the drastic difference between fluffing and not fluffing.

Look, I’ll be completely fair and recognize that I’m using the Sway Couple outside of its intended time frame. It seems that these are meant for people who want to knock out a few hours of their favorite video game or maybe watch a movie or two, not sit on it from 9am until 9pm clickity clacking on their keyboard. Still, I wish that whatever material they put in the seat area of this bag would’ve been doubled or at least made a little thicker.

At the end of the day, I’m still really happy with my Sway Couple and don’t see myself wanting to replace it for anything else in the near future.

Managing editor/music guy/social media fella of Bloody-Disgusting

8 Comments

Reviews

‘Hungry’ Review – Finally, a Film Brave Enough to Call Out Hippos for the Monsters They Truly Are

Published

on

Hungry Review

When it comes to the animal attack subgenre of horror, there’s a hierarchy of sorts with the wildlife in question. Killer shark movies are easily the most ubiquitous, while alligators/crocodiles, dogs, bears, and snakes probably lead the rest of the pack.

It’s often worth paying attention, though, when a filmmaker targets a more atypical animal threat, including the likes of Jonathan King’s Black Sheep or Juan Piquer Simón’s Slugs. A new contender rumbles its way onto the screen this month, and while we all grew up thinking hippos are rotund cuties, the truth is far more frightening – this hippo is Hungry.

Sistine (Madison Davenport) and her best friend, Hannah (Olivia Bernstone), are enjoying a vacation in New Orleans, hoping to drown out their troubles back home. They sign up for an early morning bayou tour known for its alligator sightings and are joined by four other tourists and the boat’s skipper, Rodrigo (Michel Curiel). An uneventful trip sees Rodrigo take the group off the beaten path, but when an animal in the water capsizes their boat, the group finds themselves trapped in the swamp by something unexpected and deadly.

It’s a hippo. There’s a hippo in the bayou, and it’s not happy about all these pesky people.

From Joy Houck’s Creature from Black Lake to Walter Hill’s Southern Comfort to Adam Green’s Hatchet, the movies have warned us time and again not to go into the swampy bayous of Louisiana. Those cautionary tales are appreciated, though, as bigfoot, inbred hicks, and undead serial killers are a very real threat. But hippos? In the bayou? Well, that just seems silly.

And yet, Hungry plays its blubbery, big-toothed threat with deadly seriousness, and it’s all the better for it. “But Rob,” I can already hear some of you saying, “just yesterday you reviewed the new shark attack film, Chum, and said it suffered from taking itself too seriously. What gives?” For one thing, you’re misquoting me, but more importantly, the reference there was more of an observation on the animal attack subgenre successes as a whole. The “fun” ones tend to succeed more often than their more serious counterparts, but a dramatic and thrilling time can still be found with filmmakers who know what they’re doing.

Chum may be serious, but it’s also poorly written/performed, lacking in any degree of tension, devoid of personality, and so on. By contrast, Hungry lets its suspense build on the backs of engaging characters, good performances, and believable writing. Only one of its ensemble is obnoxious – a major feat for this kind of film – but even then, their motivations are both well-written and understandable.

The rest of the characters are people you’d be happy to see survive the night, and rather than looking forward to the next kill, director James Nunn and his cast leave us uncertain and nervous about who’s going to go belly up. The nervous business traveler wanting to get back to her kids? The family of three celebrating lost loved ones while on their vacation? Joaquim de Almeida’s Walker, an old hunter, is introduced saying, “The only cute hippo is a dead hippo,” so you pretty much know where he’ll end up.

To that end, the film teases out its hippo’s first appearance until well into the ninety-minute running time. We get ripples and splashes, but it’s only around the midway point that we get our first real look at the beast, and it looks fantastic. Nunn goes on to show the hippo in all its glory, and it’s a convincing antagonist brought to life through practical prosthetic effects and digital work. From the ear twitches to the beast’s giant maw opening wide with awe and malice, the hippo’s presence feels part of the action. There’s a tangible nature to it, something practical effects excel at while digital effects sometimes fail to convince of, and both succeed here with quality work from all involved.

While we get brief exteriors early on and some visually appealing drone shots, the bulk of the film unfolds on what looks to be a highly believable, set-dressed water tank (but could very well be an actual location, in which case, kudos to the team). It’s wholly convincing as a section of the bayou, complete with shoulder-high water and arching, twisting trees emerging into the sky. The film was shot in Malta, which is, coincidentally, where Chum was filmed as well.

Nunn, who also wrote Hungry, is now ten films deep into a fairly interesting career as a genre filmmaker. He’s made four movies with Scott Adkins, three of which are certified action bangers (with 2016’s Eliminators in particular being an underrated gem). He dipped a toe into the animal attack subgenre back in 2022 with the aforementioned Shark Bait, and it’s clear he learned some lessons from that endeavor, as its first hour is an engaging, attractively shot feature that sinks fast as soon as its poorly rendered shark becomes a lead character. Hungry improves on every aspect of that film, with its biggest step up being in regard to the effects.

If there’s an area or two where Hungry lacks bite, it’s in both its gore and its ending. There are numerous kills here, but the nature of the attacks and the choices made by Nunn mean none of them result in gory assaults or outcomes. We’re shown the torn apart corpse of an alligator early on, but most of the human kills see them attacked and dragged underwater, leaving nothing but a blood spill behind. Similarly, while the ending encounter satisfies, it still feels like it should have been a bigger confrontation. Neither of these aspects really hurt the film, but a bolstering of the gore and ending antics would have definitely upped the film’s ultimate entertainment value and rewatchability.

When all is said and done, Hungry is a genuinely solid animal attack film that succeeds in making its creature threat thrilling, entertaining, and, dare I say, educational? Title notwithstanding, the film acknowledges that hippos are vegetarians, meaning the five hundred or so people they kill every year – a true fact! – are slaughtered not out of hunger, but out of spite, self-defense, or a desire to play “land orca” while tossing around us fragile humans like we’re little more than seals in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Characters are grounded and engaging, the film moves well between suspense, character beats, and action, and the effects used to bring the hippo to life are highly effective and never feel like distractions. Drop those expectations of a Hungry Hungry Hippo romp, and settle in for a terrific little survival thriller about an angry, angry hippo instead.

Chomp chomp.

Hungry releases in select theaters today, June 3, before arriving on VOD on June 23, 2026.

3 skulls out of 5

Continue Reading