Quantcast
Connect with us

Reviews

[TV Review] Chiller’s ‘Slasher’ Impresses With More Drama Than Kills!

Published

on

SLASHER

There’s been some form of a horror renaissance in television. The rampant popularity of shows like The Walking Dead and American Horror Story is most likely responsible for the recent onslaught of great horror shows like the now-defunct Hannibal and lesser shows like MTV’s Scream. Chiller has caught on, and is now producing their first ever original series, horror or otherwise, Slasher.

Slasher stars Katie McGrath (victim of the most gruesome death scene in Jurassic World) as Sarah Bennet, the sole survivor of her family’s horrific murder, now moving back to her old home in order to find some form of closure. Her husband Dylan, played by Brandon Jay McLaren, accompanies her back to the quiet town that never quite healed from its wounds. Unbeknownst to them, however, a possible copycat murderer with a mysterious connection to Sarah is on the loose, while the original killer is still safely behind bars.

The show obviously borrows many elements from previous serial-killer centric programs, but fortunately decides to focus on an adult cast, instead of a teenage high school slasher story. Slasher’s presentation is also decidedly classic, with a Halloween inspired outfit for the titular killer that wouldn’t be out of place in the 80s. The main characters are also mostly connected in a deliciously cheesy soap-opera style drama regarding Sarah’s deceased family. While the premiere only consisted of the first couple of episodes, it seems as if viewers will have a blast guessing the killer’s identity.

Slasher’s first episode does a great job at rapidly introducing decently developed characters and situations, while not feeling like an educational pilot meant only to sell the show. It also introduces an interesting character dynamic between Sarah and man who murdered her family, as she visits him in order to gain some insight on the events that shaped her life. There’s an echo of the Clarice Starling/Hannibal Lecter moments in these scenes, though Bennet is only a civilian caught in between other people’s conflicts.

Secondary characters aren’t just victims waiting to happen, however. Bennet’s friends and neighbors are established in such a way that you actually care when they are confronted with danger. Characters like Robin and Justin, who could have been just an obligatory and uninteresting gay couple actually discuss how their relationship is viewed in their small community, and it impacts the story. Even unsavory old ladies are given some form of backstory, making sure that no one feels like a cardboard cutout.

The second episode begins to deal a bit more with the concept of loss, and how the killer is inspired by punishments for the seven deadly sins. As the plot thickens, the show begins to find its strength, although many of the whodunit elements in Slasher have been done to death in the past (no pun intended). As the body count rises, there’s also the matter of how many of these characters will be left standing for the second season, if there will be one.

So far, the killer’s appearances have been brief and far apart, which is a double-edged sword for the show. While keeping him away from the action onscreen makes us view him as some kind of omniscient monster hell bent on some sort of murderous mission, it also removes a lot of the slasher movie charm that the series boasts in its title. This could, and probably will, change in future episodes, but for now Slasher needs something more to keep the audience interested.

Personally, I’m looking forward to the third episode, as I wouldn’t mind tuning in once a week to slowly uncover the mystery behind Slasher. Katie McGrath is great as a protagonist and possible final girl, and the villain is menacing enough to sometimes even be scary. There’s still a lot of ground to cover, but so far this is another great addition to the horror television show roster. Chiller’s first outing with original programming is an unexpected success, and premieres on March 4th, at 9/8c.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and filmmaker that spends most of his time thinking about movies.

17 Comments

Reviews

‘Hungry’ Review – Finally, a Film Brave Enough to Call Out Hippos for the Monsters They Truly Are

Published

on

Hungry Review

When it comes to the animal attack subgenre of horror, there’s a hierarchy of sorts with the wildlife in question. Killer shark movies are easily the most ubiquitous, while alligators/crocodiles, dogs, bears, and snakes probably lead the rest of the pack.

It’s often worth paying attention, though, when a filmmaker targets a more atypical animal threat, including the likes of Jonathan King’s Black Sheep or Juan Piquer Simón’s Slugs. A new contender rumbles its way onto the screen this month, and while we all grew up thinking hippos are rotund cuties, the truth is far more frightening – this hippo is Hungry.

Sistine (Madison Davenport) and her best friend, Hannah (Olivia Bernstone), are enjoying a vacation in New Orleans, hoping to drown out their troubles back home. They sign up for an early morning bayou tour known for its alligator sightings and are joined by four other tourists and the boat’s skipper, Rodrigo (Michel Curiel). An uneventful trip sees Rodrigo take the group off the beaten path, but when an animal in the water capsizes their boat, the group finds themselves trapped in the swamp by something unexpected and deadly.

It’s a hippo. There’s a hippo in the bayou, and it’s not happy about all these pesky people.

From Joy Houck’s Creature from Black Lake to Walter Hill’s Southern Comfort to Adam Green’s Hatchet, the movies have warned us time and again not to go into the swampy bayous of Louisiana. Those cautionary tales are appreciated, though, as bigfoot, inbred hicks, and undead serial killers are a very real threat. But hippos? In the bayou? Well, that just seems silly.

And yet, Hungry plays its blubbery, big-toothed threat with deadly seriousness, and it’s all the better for it. “But Rob,” I can already hear some of you saying, “just yesterday you reviewed the new shark attack film, Chum, and said it suffered from taking itself too seriously. What gives?” For one thing, you’re misquoting me, but more importantly, the reference there was more of an observation on the animal attack subgenre successes as a whole. The “fun” ones tend to succeed more often than their more serious counterparts, but a dramatic and thrilling time can still be found with filmmakers who know what they’re doing.

Chum may be serious, but it’s also poorly written/performed, lacking in any degree of tension, devoid of personality, and so on. By contrast, Hungry lets its suspense build on the backs of engaging characters, good performances, and believable writing. Only one of its ensemble is obnoxious – a major feat for this kind of film – but even then, their motivations are both well-written and understandable.

The rest of the characters are people you’d be happy to see survive the night, and rather than looking forward to the next kill, director James Nunn and his cast leave us uncertain and nervous about who’s going to go belly up. The nervous business traveler wanting to get back to her kids? The family of three celebrating lost loved ones while on their vacation? Joaquim de Almeida’s Walker, an old hunter, is introduced saying, “The only cute hippo is a dead hippo,” so you pretty much know where he’ll end up.

To that end, the film teases out its hippo’s first appearance until well into the ninety-minute running time. We get ripples and splashes, but it’s only around the midway point that we get our first real look at the beast, and it looks fantastic. Nunn goes on to show the hippo in all its glory, and it’s a convincing antagonist brought to life through practical prosthetic effects and digital work. From the ear twitches to the beast’s giant maw opening wide with awe and malice, the hippo’s presence feels part of the action. There’s a tangible nature to it, something practical effects excel at while digital effects sometimes fail to convince of, and both succeed here with quality work from all involved.

While we get brief exteriors early on and some visually appealing drone shots, the bulk of the film unfolds on what looks to be a highly believable, set-dressed water tank (but could very well be an actual location, in which case, kudos to the team). It’s wholly convincing as a section of the bayou, complete with shoulder-high water and arching, twisting trees emerging into the sky. The film was shot in Malta, which is, coincidentally, where Chum was filmed as well.

Nunn, who also wrote Hungry, is now ten films deep into a fairly interesting career as a genre filmmaker. He’s made four movies with Scott Adkins, three of which are certified action bangers (with 2016’s Eliminators in particular being an underrated gem). He dipped a toe into the animal attack subgenre back in 2022 with the aforementioned Shark Bait, and it’s clear he learned some lessons from that endeavor, as its first hour is an engaging, attractively shot feature that sinks fast as soon as its poorly rendered shark becomes a lead character. Hungry improves on every aspect of that film, with its biggest step up being in regard to the effects.

If there’s an area or two where Hungry lacks bite, it’s in both its gore and its ending. There are numerous kills here, but the nature of the attacks and the choices made by Nunn mean none of them result in gory assaults or outcomes. We’re shown the torn apart corpse of an alligator early on, but most of the human kills see them attacked and dragged underwater, leaving nothing but a blood spill behind. Similarly, while the ending encounter satisfies, it still feels like it should have been a bigger confrontation. Neither of these aspects really hurt the film, but a bolstering of the gore and ending antics would have definitely upped the film’s ultimate entertainment value and rewatchability.

When all is said and done, Hungry is a genuinely solid animal attack film that succeeds in making its creature threat thrilling, entertaining, and, dare I say, educational? Title notwithstanding, the film acknowledges that hippos are vegetarians, meaning the five hundred or so people they kill every year – a true fact! – are slaughtered not out of hunger, but out of spite, self-defense, or a desire to play “land orca” while tossing around us fragile humans like we’re little more than seals in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Characters are grounded and engaging, the film moves well between suspense, character beats, and action, and the effects used to bring the hippo to life are highly effective and never feel like distractions. Drop those expectations of a Hungry Hungry Hippo romp, and settle in for a terrific little survival thriller about an angry, angry hippo instead.

Chomp chomp.

Hungry releases in select theaters today, June 3, before arriving on VOD on June 23, 2026.

3 skulls out of 5

Continue Reading