Connect with us

Reviews

‘Strange Darling’ Fantastic Fest Review – Cat and Mouse Thriller Has Plenty of Surprises

Published

on

Strange Darling Fantastic Fest Review

“Do you have any idea the kind of risks a woman like me takes every time she decides to have a little bit of fun?” So says our female protagonist in writer/director JT Mollner‘s Strange Darling, a film that dares us to question the roles men and women are expected to play. Are women just prudes who don’t love casual sex? Are men just rapist serial killers waiting for their next mark? What exactly are the boundaries of consent? Strange Darling asks these questions, making for a smarter-than-you’d-expect entry into the cat and mouse thriller genre.

Following an opening scroll informing us that the film we are about to see is a dramatization of the final known killings of a serial killer’s multi-state killing spree, we are introduced to “The Lady” (Willa Fitzgerald, Scream: The TV Series) who, in an extended slow motion sequence that plays over the opening credits, is revealed to be running from “The Demon” (Kyle Gallner, Smile), and what follows is a relentless thrill ride of a film that acts as an extended, feature-length chase scene.

With an introduction like that, you’d be forgiven for thinking that Strange Darling is going to be nothing more than a gratuitously violent and misogynistic foray into the mind of a serial killer. Thankfully, Strange Darling has a lot more on its mind (and even more tricks up its sleeve), setting it apart from other genre films of that ilk. That being said, it is also one of those films that’s nearly impossible to review without spoiling, as its twists and turns happen so early and often that discussing anything past the 15-minute mark would delve into spoiler territory.

Told in 6 chapters presented out of order, Strange Darling gets a lot of mileage out of its nonlinear narrative. This makes for plenty of jaw-dropping “oh shit” moments of realization, and a highly entertaining initial viewing experience. Mollner (Outlaws and Angels) has a clear eye for visuals, shooting most of the film in harsh sunlight. Red cars, clothing and wallpaper pop against the yellows of the film’s daytime sequences, whereas the nighttime sequences are bathed in striking red and blue lighting.

Early on, a title card informs us that the film is shot on 35mm film, which is commendable, but the decision to present the narrative as a dramatization of “real” events feels unnecessary. The aforementioned opening scroll (complete with a deep-voiced, ominous narrator) immediately calls to mind The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, but whereas that film’s 16mm presentation gave it a gritty, documentary-like feel, Strange Darling‘s 35mm presentation makes it feel too cinematic at times. But hey, in this age of digital photography it’s exciting to see the format still being used.

Where Strange Darling really excels is in its casting. Fitzgerald gives an exceptionally strong performance, acting the hell out of every scene she’s in. It’s a far cry from her role in Scream: The TV Series and it’s delightful watching her play out of that sandbox. Gallner, quickly becoming a modern Scream King, has the more difficult role in that his character is playing things close to the chest for the first half of the film. Still, he delivers a subtle, and at times manic performance. Supporting turns from Barbara Hershey and Ed Begley Jr. as an old couple whose house The Lady seeks refuge in are also fun, if fleeting, bright spots.

The biggest issue facing Strange Darling is that, once all of its cards are on the table just past the hour mark (when the final chapter starts), it’s run out of creative juices. What started out as an intricately-plotted, Tarantino-esque piece of pulp devolves into an extended resolution that doesn’t really have a lot to say. It starts several conversations, but refuses to finish them (or maybe that’s the point?). That the conclusion plays out in a predictable, straightforward manner is a shame, considering everything that comes before is so subversive.

In the end, Strange Darling refuses to dig deeper with the lofty questions it poses, but that doesn’t erase the good will the first two acts of the film has built up. What we are left with is a grim little thriller whose lofty ambitions prove to be too much for it in the end, but you’ve got to give it credit for trying.

Strange Darling made its world premiere at Fantastic Fest and is currently seeking distribution.

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Reviews

Lifetime’s ‘Death Down the Aisle’ Is All Business and Red Herrings [Review]

Published

on

Death Down the Aisle begins with the tantalizing image of a bride, Malorie (Jess Brown), dressed in a wedding dress splattered with blood.

This is a brief (unnecessary) in media res opening before writer Audrey C. Marie jumps the action back to earlier in the day. It’s the day of the wedding, Malorie is preparing to wed Jon (David Alexander) and there’s a whirlwind introduction of wedding guests, many of whom are either family, work associates from Jon’s legal firm, or both.

Most of these relationships aren’t clear until after Jon’s death (this isn’t a spoiler; his death is heavily telegraphed by director Roxanne Boisvert). Only after the murder does it become clear that Death Down The Aisle is primarily interested in exploring red herrings, gossipy busy bodies, and characters making A LOT of phone calls.

Let’s rewind: Malorie is marrying Jon, an older man with an adult daughter, Bridget (Anna Kopacek), who looks nearly the same age as her. Jon works at Stone Legal Services with his brother Zach (Scott Gibson), as well as Malorie’s mother, Pamela (Jayne Heitmeyer) and Zach’s younger girlfriend, Amy (Gracie Callahan).

Each of these characters hand Jon a drink before the wedding begins – Zach – a Scotch, Amy – a coffee, and Pamela – an energy drink. There’s also a mysterious glass of champagne delivered to Malorie’s room that Jon drinks and Boisvert ensures that the audience keeps track of each of them by zooming in each time. This is why it’s no surprise when Jon keels over mid-ceremony, coughs up blood on Malorie’s dress, and immediately croaks.

Naturally it turns out that nearly everyone had a motive to see him dead. Pamela recently quit the firm because Jon wouldn’t confirm her salary; Zach was pushing for a merger with rival Miles (Colin Price) that Jon was unsure about, and the dead man fretted that Amy was a gold digger, so Jon wouldn’t support her promotion, either.

Adding to the too plentiful number of suspects is Malorie’s ex-husband Ryan (Frank Fiola), a recovering addict. Even Jon’s own daughter ends up on the list when it’s revealed that they were fighting in the weeks leading up to his death.

The only one who doesn’t have a motive to kill Jon is Malorie’s best friend Francesca (JaNae Armogan), who works at the wedding venue and thinks she saw something fishy. Naturally she’s killed off before the end of the first act.

What follows is a lot of conversation between characters about the firm, the merger, Malorie and Jon’s relationship, and how everyone is lying to everyone else. The problem is that 90% of these conversations happen via phone or text and few of them are interesting. Marie’s script fails to develop the characters beyond their motive, which means that the majority of the plot developments aren’t particularly engaging because the characters are so shallow.

With so many people and interweaving relationships involved, it’s hard to zero in and identify with anyone. Malorie is clearly meant to be the protagonist because, like most Lifetime films, she assumes the role of investigator, despite the presence of Detective Levine (Christian Paul) on the periphery.

But even she is kept at a distance from the audience. Because we only see a few moments of her relationship with Jon, secrets that the pair were keeping from friends and family don’t carry any emotional resonance when they come to light later in the film. One in  particular seems to come out of left field and seemingly only exists to introduce another red herring in order to prolong the mystery for another 20 minutes.

Alas none of the characters get much to do, so none of the performances pop. Kopacek and Callahan look too similar and are styled identically, which sometimes makes it hard to distinguish one from the other. Further issues with casting is that the age disparity between Malorie & Jon and Zach & Amy is never mentioned (neither is Jon’s paternity of Bridget). This may be an ageist observation, but even the fact that Pamela never comments that her daughter was marrying her (Pamela’s) boss seems unusual, especially when Death Down the Aisle regularly suggests that one or more character is a gold digger.

Arguably the film’s biggest issue is that everything circles around the business dealings of the firm, none of which is engaging or interesting (hilariously it’s never even made clear what kind of law they practice!) Without more distinct characters, there’s very little to hang the narrative on.

Unfortunately after a solid opening, Death Down the Aisle gets stuck spinning its wheels, endlessly recycling its red herrings and interminable phone calls between characters. The suspect list is long, but the film’s energy lags through the saggy middle section and the climax can’t bring Death Down the Aisle back to life.

This one could have easily been called “Business Phone Calls”…and that’s not great.

Death Down the Aisle premiered on Lifetime Thursday, June 13.

2 skulls out of 5

Continue Reading