Connect with us

Reviews

‘Crazy Fun Park’ Review – An Emotional Gateway Horror Series from the ‘Boys in the Trees’ Director

Published

on

Crazy Fun Park

The concept of death can be confusing at any age. Even adults have a hard time processing this unavoidable part of life. For young people, though, death should be the last thing on their minds. And for a long time, the two main characters of Crazy Fun Park didn’t have to consider their mortality. Best friends Chester and Mapplethorpe were more concerned with finishing their graphic novel and making it to school on time each morning than the possibility of never seeing each other again. Yet in this Australian teen-drama series, death catches these boys completely off guard and puts their friendship to the test.

Death is typically the conclusion of relationships in other stories, but here it’s just the beginning for these two soulmates. Chester and Mapplethorpe (neatly played by Henry Strand and Stacy Clausen) are the embodiment of the word “inseparable.” Drawing from real life, series creator Nicholas Verso (Boys in the Trees) communicates death in terms that everyone, regardless of age, can understand. The end result is what can be best described as gateway horror. And like so many other offerings of young ones becoming painfully aware of death, Crazy Fun Park harnesses the power of dark fantasy.

Talking about young people’s deaths is always a tricky matter in storytelling. Being too serious can be scary, whereas being too silly appears disrespectful. However, Crazy Fun Park settles on a healthy medium. Its discussion about life and death is both meaningful and entertaining. Obviously there is a dark sense of humor about how each character dies; the spirits of those who previously perished in the show’s namesake, an abandoned amusement park, all went out in some gruesome and/or sad manner. A few demises even play out like Jackass stunts minus the survival part. However, the aftermath tends to be emotional and thoughtful. Verso ensures most of the other spectral residents of Crazy Fun Park have wistful closure once it’s their time to be the focus in the overall story.

Philosophizing death for a younger audience — young-at-hearts can certainly still get something out of this story — tends to work well with a healthy dose of imagination. In addition to its natural state of offbeat humor, Crazy Fun Park delivers dramatic bursts filtered through a lens of metaphorical fantasy. For instance, the spirits in this world vanish altogether once they’re no longer remembered by the living. Fans of other life-after-death stories like Beetlejuice and Dead Like Me will surely be familiar with this patented method of using genre to make those affecting moments leave more of a mark.

Of all its impressive feats, one that stands out in Crazy Fun Park is an effortless ability to remove the barriers preventing many young people, especially boys, from expressing themselves and being vulnerable. Even before death pays them a visit, Chester and Mapplethorpe are a sensitive pair. They would rather say “friends for another day” than mere goodbyes, and they show affection without any hint of sarcasm. Their tender bond is refreshing and comforting. The time comes when that connection is challenged by a range of factors — namely misunderstandings and acts of selfishness — and as frustrating as that may feel in the moment, these scenes are handled with bracing honesty and insight.

While marked down as a comedy, Nicholas Verso’s series is really more of a Trojan horse for a grief-drama meticulously crafted for the younger crowd. It doesn’t talk down to its target demographic like other media these days, and it definitely doesn’t trauma-dump without explanation and relief. As a whole, this series is patient, compelling and profound. Children’s entertainment requires extra thought and effort when tackling heavy subject matter, and Crazy Fun Park excels on both fronts.

The award-winning Crazy Fun Park is now streaming on Hulu.

Crazy Fun Park

Image: ABC ME

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Reviews

Lifetime’s ‘Death Down the Aisle’ Is All Business and Red Herrings [Review]

Published

on

Death Down the Aisle begins with the tantalizing image of a bride, Malorie (Jess Brown), dressed in a wedding dress splattered with blood.

This is a brief (unnecessary) in media res opening before writer Audrey C. Marie jumps the action back to earlier in the day. It’s the day of the wedding, Malorie is preparing to wed Jon (David Alexander) and there’s a whirlwind introduction of wedding guests, many of whom are either family, work associates from Jon’s legal firm, or both.

Most of these relationships aren’t clear until after Jon’s death (this isn’t a spoiler; his death is heavily telegraphed by director Roxanne Boisvert). Only after the murder does it become clear that Death Down The Aisle is primarily interested in exploring red herrings, gossipy busy bodies, and characters making A LOT of phone calls.

Let’s rewind: Malorie is marrying Jon, an older man with an adult daughter, Bridget (Anna Kopacek), who looks nearly the same age as her. Jon works at Stone Legal Services with his brother Zach (Scott Gibson), as well as Malorie’s mother, Pamela (Jayne Heitmeyer) and Zach’s younger girlfriend, Amy (Gracie Callahan).

Each of these characters hand Jon a drink before the wedding begins – Zach – a Scotch, Amy – a coffee, and Pamela – an energy drink. There’s also a mysterious glass of champagne delivered to Malorie’s room that Jon drinks and Boisvert ensures that the audience keeps track of each of them by zooming in each time. This is why it’s no surprise when Jon keels over mid-ceremony, coughs up blood on Malorie’s dress, and immediately croaks.

Naturally it turns out that nearly everyone had a motive to see him dead. Pamela recently quit the firm because Jon wouldn’t confirm her salary; Zach was pushing for a merger with rival Miles (Colin Price) that Jon was unsure about, and the dead man fretted that Amy was a gold digger, so Jon wouldn’t support her promotion, either.

Adding to the too plentiful number of suspects is Malorie’s ex-husband Ryan (Frank Fiola), a recovering addict. Even Jon’s own daughter ends up on the list when it’s revealed that they were fighting in the weeks leading up to his death.

The only one who doesn’t have a motive to kill Jon is Malorie’s best friend Francesca (JaNae Armogan), who works at the wedding venue and thinks she saw something fishy. Naturally she’s killed off before the end of the first act.

What follows is a lot of conversation between characters about the firm, the merger, Malorie and Jon’s relationship, and how everyone is lying to everyone else. The problem is that 90% of these conversations happen via phone or text and few of them are interesting. Marie’s script fails to develop the characters beyond their motive, which means that the majority of the plot developments aren’t particularly engaging because the characters are so shallow.

With so many people and interweaving relationships involved, it’s hard to zero in and identify with anyone. Malorie is clearly meant to be the protagonist because, like most Lifetime films, she assumes the role of investigator, despite the presence of Detective Levine (Christian Paul) on the periphery.

But even she is kept at a distance from the audience. Because we only see a few moments of her relationship with Jon, secrets that the pair were keeping from friends and family don’t carry any emotional resonance when they come to light later in the film. One in  particular seems to come out of left field and seemingly only exists to introduce another red herring in order to prolong the mystery for another 20 minutes.

Alas none of the characters get much to do, so none of the performances pop. Kopacek and Callahan look too similar and are styled identically, which sometimes makes it hard to distinguish one from the other. Further issues with casting is that the age disparity between Malorie & Jon and Zach & Amy is never mentioned (neither is Jon’s paternity of Bridget). This may be an ageist observation, but even the fact that Pamela never comments that her daughter was marrying her (Pamela’s) boss seems unusual, especially when Death Down the Aisle regularly suggests that one or more character is a gold digger.

Arguably the film’s biggest issue is that everything circles around the business dealings of the firm, none of which is engaging or interesting (hilariously it’s never even made clear what kind of law they practice!) Without more distinct characters, there’s very little to hang the narrative on.

Unfortunately after a solid opening, Death Down the Aisle gets stuck spinning its wheels, endlessly recycling its red herrings and interminable phone calls between characters. The suspect list is long, but the film’s energy lags through the saggy middle section and the climax can’t bring Death Down the Aisle back to life.

This one could have easily been called “Business Phone Calls”…and that’s not great.

Death Down the Aisle premiered on Lifetime Thursday, June 13.

2 skulls out of 5

Continue Reading