Connect with us

Reviews

‘In a Violent Nature’ Sundance Review – Arthouse Slasher Frames Gory Carnage From Killer’s Perspective

Published

on

In A Violent Nature Review

Writer/Director Chris Nash’s feature debut, In a Violent Nature, upends a straightforward Friday the 13th-inspired slasher concept by reframing the events almost entirely from the perspective of the undead killer. That’s not the only massive shift that sets Nash’s slasher apart from conventional fare. In a Violent Nature may offer slasher thrills and a delightfully gory rampage across the wilderness, but Nash’s approach captures the carnage through ambient realism. It results in a fascinating arthouse horror experiment that plays more like a minimalist slice-of-life feature with a grim twist.

The opening frame signals a vastly different type of slasher as unseen voices recount the local legend of the White Pines slaughter as the camera fixates on the remnants of a dilapidated fire tower. Once those voices retreat back to their friend group for a weekend of fun in the woods, undead Johnny (Ry Barrett) awakens and rises from the damp soil. The camera then shifts to observe Johnny’s methodical quest to punish those who unwittingly summoned him, watching from a safe distance behind or over his shoulder. Johnny bides his time, demonstrating unaffable and unwavering patience like his Jason Voorhees counterpart, as he embarks on a new wave of slaughter.

Nash’s feature debut fills in the blanks of the killer’s whereabouts when not on the immediate attack. That leads to long stretches of Johnny lumbering through pristine woods, with cinematographer Pierce Derks capturing the inherent beauty of the forest through wide shots enhanced by diegetic, ambient sound. The matter-of-fact approach that favors realism and emphasis on nature draws easy comparisons to minimalist filmmakers like Gus Van Sant or Kelly Reichardt. This methodical tromping through the woods gets punctuated by bursts of slasher familiarity as Johnny occasionally comes across new weaponry and victims to rip apart.

In lesser hands, the disparate tone toggling between conventional slasher and arthouse experiment would clash to an off-putting degree. But Nash makes smart choices to ensure these warring tones somehow mesh into a cohesive effort. That’s largely thanks to the distance created not just between the silent supernatural killer and his victims, whose dialogue is often muted compared to the loud diegetic sounds, but also between the killer and the audience. Johnny’s backstory gets relayed piecemeal, signaling a far more energetic slasher happening offscreen, rendering the slasher villain a fascinating curiosity. It’s those distant, quiet stretches that often intrigue most, with Nash raising questions for his audience to sit with, like how much humanity possibly remains within this hulking undead mass.  

Nash further demonstrates a keen reverence for slashers, beyond its orderly deconstruction of the formula, by not withholding at all when it comes to the kills. The arthouse sensibilities get paused throughout by a firm commitment to a true slasher staple: inventive and gnarly as hell kills. Of course, that doesn’t come as much of a surprise, considering Nash hails from a special effects background, having previously worked as the on-set creature effects supervisor on Psycho Goreman. Nash also enlisted Psycho Goreman writer/director and SFX wizard Steven Kostanski for the film’s prosthetic effects. All of this to say that, while Johnny may play it simple upon first emerging from his grave, the killer gets downright ruthless in finding the most imaginative and deranged ways to destroy a human body. In a Violent Nature features at least one extremely gory, wild death that’s sure to get horror fans talking for a while to come.

For all that In a Violent Nature does well, it eventually fizzles out with a focus Johnny’s final girl, Kris (Andrea Pavlovic). While the unhurried, minimalist approach works well for an undead killer who has no concept of urgency, it fails when applying that same philosophical meditation to Kris and her newfound brush with trauma. Instead of some definitive conclusion, In a Violent Nature just slowly drifts into subdued tedium.

Nash’s debut offers a stylized high-concept slasher whose arthouse leanings are sure to polarize. The stripped-down approach fascinates, and the commitment to practical gore is commendable, even if it doesn’t reinvent the wheel.

In a Violent Nature made its World Premiere at the Sundance Film Festival. The release date for the Shudder slasher is TBA.

3.5 out of 5

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Reviews

Lifetime’s ‘Death Down the Aisle’ Is All Business and Red Herrings [Review]

Published

on

Death Down the Aisle begins with the tantalizing image of a bride, Malorie (Jess Brown), dressed in a wedding dress splattered with blood.

This is a brief (unnecessary) in media res opening before writer Audrey C. Marie jumps the action back to earlier in the day. It’s the day of the wedding, Malorie is preparing to wed Jon (David Alexander) and there’s a whirlwind introduction of wedding guests, many of whom are either family, work associates from Jon’s legal firm, or both.

Most of these relationships aren’t clear until after Jon’s death (this isn’t a spoiler; his death is heavily telegraphed by director Roxanne Boisvert). Only after the murder does it become clear that Death Down The Aisle is primarily interested in exploring red herrings, gossipy busy bodies, and characters making A LOT of phone calls.

Let’s rewind: Malorie is marrying Jon, an older man with an adult daughter, Bridget (Anna Kopacek), who looks nearly the same age as her. Jon works at Stone Legal Services with his brother Zach (Scott Gibson), as well as Malorie’s mother, Pamela (Jayne Heitmeyer) and Zach’s younger girlfriend, Amy (Gracie Callahan).

Each of these characters hand Jon a drink before the wedding begins – Zach – a Scotch, Amy – a coffee, and Pamela – an energy drink. There’s also a mysterious glass of champagne delivered to Malorie’s room that Jon drinks and Boisvert ensures that the audience keeps track of each of them by zooming in each time. This is why it’s no surprise when Jon keels over mid-ceremony, coughs up blood on Malorie’s dress, and immediately croaks.

Naturally it turns out that nearly everyone had a motive to see him dead. Pamela recently quit the firm because Jon wouldn’t confirm her salary; Zach was pushing for a merger with rival Miles (Colin Price) that Jon was unsure about, and the dead man fretted that Amy was a gold digger, so Jon wouldn’t support her promotion, either.

Adding to the too plentiful number of suspects is Malorie’s ex-husband Ryan (Frank Fiola), a recovering addict. Even Jon’s own daughter ends up on the list when it’s revealed that they were fighting in the weeks leading up to his death.

The only one who doesn’t have a motive to kill Jon is Malorie’s best friend Francesca (JaNae Armogan), who works at the wedding venue and thinks she saw something fishy. Naturally she’s killed off before the end of the first act.

What follows is a lot of conversation between characters about the firm, the merger, Malorie and Jon’s relationship, and how everyone is lying to everyone else. The problem is that 90% of these conversations happen via phone or text and few of them are interesting. Marie’s script fails to develop the characters beyond their motive, which means that the majority of the plot developments aren’t particularly engaging because the characters are so shallow.

With so many people and interweaving relationships involved, it’s hard to zero in and identify with anyone. Malorie is clearly meant to be the protagonist because, like most Lifetime films, she assumes the role of investigator, despite the presence of Detective Levine (Christian Paul) on the periphery.

But even she is kept at a distance from the audience. Because we only see a few moments of her relationship with Jon, secrets that the pair were keeping from friends and family don’t carry any emotional resonance when they come to light later in the film. One in  particular seems to come out of left field and seemingly only exists to introduce another red herring in order to prolong the mystery for another 20 minutes.

Alas none of the characters get much to do, so none of the performances pop. Kopacek and Callahan look too similar and are styled identically, which sometimes makes it hard to distinguish one from the other. Further issues with casting is that the age disparity between Malorie & Jon and Zach & Amy is never mentioned (neither is Jon’s paternity of Bridget). This may be an ageist observation, but even the fact that Pamela never comments that her daughter was marrying her (Pamela’s) boss seems unusual, especially when Death Down the Aisle regularly suggests that one or more character is a gold digger.

Arguably the film’s biggest issue is that everything circles around the business dealings of the firm, none of which is engaging or interesting (hilariously it’s never even made clear what kind of law they practice!) Without more distinct characters, there’s very little to hang the narrative on.

Unfortunately after a solid opening, Death Down the Aisle gets stuck spinning its wheels, endlessly recycling its red herrings and interminable phone calls between characters. The suspect list is long, but the film’s energy lags through the saggy middle section and the climax can’t bring Death Down the Aisle back to life.

This one could have easily been called “Business Phone Calls”…and that’s not great.

Death Down the Aisle premiered on Lifetime Thursday, June 13.

2 skulls out of 5

Continue Reading