Connect with us

Reviews

‘Things Will Be Different’ SXSW Review – Family Bonds Get Tested in Engaging Sci-Fi Thriller

Published

on

Things Will Be Different - Michael Felker

Writer/Director/Editor Michael Felker knows his way around time-shifting, metaphysical labors of love, having edited Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead’s Something in the DirtSynchronicThe Endless, and Spring. Felker’s feature directorial debut, Things Will Be Different, seamlessly fits into the Benson/Moorhead cinematic universe, introducing a fractured sibling relationship put through the physical and emotional wringer when they play with forces they don’t quite understand.

Estranged siblings Sidney (Riley DandyChristmas Bloody Christmas) and Joseph (Adam David ThompsonVampires vs. The Bronx) fall into old habits like no time has passed at all when they rendezvous at a diner. That’s largely due to Joseph having a large bag of cash grabbed from an armed robbery, and the authorities are rapidly closing in. The siblings quickly make their way to an abandoned farmhouse with instructions on how to escape their current reality. The plan is to wait out the cops from the safety of an alternate timeline, but their plan to escape the law will bend more than just time.

For a lengthy stretch, Felker explores the siblings’ relationship and history as Sidney and Joseph settle into a routine to pass the time while they wait for things to cool off. Dandy and Thompson’s easy banter and chemistry make quick work of building out the siblings’ interiority and lived-in bonds. That they have a tight-knit formation when it comes to dealing with potential threats only further sells Sidney and Joseph’s bond and unshakable. Only when new phenomena and developments arise do the fractures begin to show.

Felker takes a measured approach to doling out exposition, both for the siblings’ history and the phenomenon behind the farm’s vacuum in time and space. It puts thoughtful precedence on exploring the profound love and lingering remorse between brother and sister, then lets the supernatural aspects slowly decimate their carefully curated defenses. The slow simmer eventually reaches a roaring boil as Felker plunges his leads into a mind-bending fight to escape their self-made reality. The meditative familial drama gives way to a sci-fi thriller, and Felker once again demonstrates a knack for knowing how much to reveal and when. There’s a simplicity to the worldbuilding here that works because Felker never overshows his hand.

Complete with a cameo by Justin Benson, who produces alongside Aaron Moorhead, Things Will Be Different looks and feels like a Rustic Films feature in the way that it explores the human experience and relationships against a genre backdrop. Cinematographer Carissa Dorson captures the stunning details and natural beauty of the rural farmland, an atypically expansive yet isolated setting for the claustrophobic time prison Sidney and Joseph find themselves trapped in.

Its narrative structure may not be nearly as intricate as The Endless or even Resolution, regarding its use of time and space, but Felker layers in enough bursts of horror and sci-fi to retain audience investment in his characters’ unique plight. More importantly, the filmmaker’s careful framing of Sidney and Joseph’s story builds to a wholly satisfying conclusion, the precise type of outcome that brings the film’s themes full circle with great impact.

Things Will Be Different is an accomplished, affecting feature directorial debut that smartly uses its time concept to give a pair of morally skewed siblings a chance to rewrite the past for the sake of a better future. It’s in the space in between where Felker effectively tests familial bonds to their limit through genre conventions.

Things Will Be Different made its World Premiere at SXSW. Release info TBD.

4 out of 5 skulls

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Reviews

Lifetime’s ‘Death Down the Aisle’ Is All Business and Red Herrings [Review]

Published

on

Death Down the Aisle begins with the tantalizing image of a bride, Malorie (Jess Brown), dressed in a wedding dress splattered with blood.

This is a brief (unnecessary) in media res opening before writer Audrey C. Marie jumps the action back to earlier in the day. It’s the day of the wedding, Malorie is preparing to wed Jon (David Alexander) and there’s a whirlwind introduction of wedding guests, many of whom are either family, work associates from Jon’s legal firm, or both.

Most of these relationships aren’t clear until after Jon’s death (this isn’t a spoiler; his death is heavily telegraphed by director Roxanne Boisvert). Only after the murder does it become clear that Death Down The Aisle is primarily interested in exploring red herrings, gossipy busy bodies, and characters making A LOT of phone calls.

Let’s rewind: Malorie is marrying Jon, an older man with an adult daughter, Bridget (Anna Kopacek), who looks nearly the same age as her. Jon works at Stone Legal Services with his brother Zach (Scott Gibson), as well as Malorie’s mother, Pamela (Jayne Heitmeyer) and Zach’s younger girlfriend, Amy (Gracie Callahan).

Each of these characters hand Jon a drink before the wedding begins – Zach – a Scotch, Amy – a coffee, and Pamela – an energy drink. There’s also a mysterious glass of champagne delivered to Malorie’s room that Jon drinks and Boisvert ensures that the audience keeps track of each of them by zooming in each time. This is why it’s no surprise when Jon keels over mid-ceremony, coughs up blood on Malorie’s dress, and immediately croaks.

Naturally it turns out that nearly everyone had a motive to see him dead. Pamela recently quit the firm because Jon wouldn’t confirm her salary; Zach was pushing for a merger with rival Miles (Colin Price) that Jon was unsure about, and the dead man fretted that Amy was a gold digger, so Jon wouldn’t support her promotion, either.

Adding to the too plentiful number of suspects is Malorie’s ex-husband Ryan (Frank Fiola), a recovering addict. Even Jon’s own daughter ends up on the list when it’s revealed that they were fighting in the weeks leading up to his death.

The only one who doesn’t have a motive to kill Jon is Malorie’s best friend Francesca (JaNae Armogan), who works at the wedding venue and thinks she saw something fishy. Naturally she’s killed off before the end of the first act.

What follows is a lot of conversation between characters about the firm, the merger, Malorie and Jon’s relationship, and how everyone is lying to everyone else. The problem is that 90% of these conversations happen via phone or text and few of them are interesting. Marie’s script fails to develop the characters beyond their motive, which means that the majority of the plot developments aren’t particularly engaging because the characters are so shallow.

With so many people and interweaving relationships involved, it’s hard to zero in and identify with anyone. Malorie is clearly meant to be the protagonist because, like most Lifetime films, she assumes the role of investigator, despite the presence of Detective Levine (Christian Paul) on the periphery.

But even she is kept at a distance from the audience. Because we only see a few moments of her relationship with Jon, secrets that the pair were keeping from friends and family don’t carry any emotional resonance when they come to light later in the film. One in  particular seems to come out of left field and seemingly only exists to introduce another red herring in order to prolong the mystery for another 20 minutes.

Alas none of the characters get much to do, so none of the performances pop. Kopacek and Callahan look too similar and are styled identically, which sometimes makes it hard to distinguish one from the other. Further issues with casting is that the age disparity between Malorie & Jon and Zach & Amy is never mentioned (neither is Jon’s paternity of Bridget). This may be an ageist observation, but even the fact that Pamela never comments that her daughter was marrying her (Pamela’s) boss seems unusual, especially when Death Down the Aisle regularly suggests that one or more character is a gold digger.

Arguably the film’s biggest issue is that everything circles around the business dealings of the firm, none of which is engaging or interesting (hilariously it’s never even made clear what kind of law they practice!) Without more distinct characters, there’s very little to hang the narrative on.

Unfortunately after a solid opening, Death Down the Aisle gets stuck spinning its wheels, endlessly recycling its red herrings and interminable phone calls between characters. The suspect list is long, but the film’s energy lags through the saggy middle section and the climax can’t bring Death Down the Aisle back to life.

This one could have easily been called “Business Phone Calls”…and that’s not great.

Death Down the Aisle premiered on Lifetime Thursday, June 13.

2 skulls out of 5

Continue Reading