Quantcast
Connect with us

Reviews

‘Odyssey’ SXSW Review – Morally Dubious Character Study Explodes into Ultra-Violent Thriller

Published

on

Odyssey

Natasha Flynn (Polly Maberly) feels destined for trouble in director Gerard Johnson’s (Hyena, Muscle) gritty London thriller, Odyssey, but in a far more violent, genre-leaning way than you’d expect. The prickly, coke-fueled real estate agent presents as far more financially successful than she is, putting her constantly on the cusp of complete self-destruction. While that alone would make for a fascinating character study, Johnson instead puts her on a strange, well, odyssey into the city’s dark underbelly, putting Narasha on a collision course with shocking violence.

Odyssey begins as a drama, with no looming signs for the left field turn straight into dark thriller territory to introduce an unconventional lead in Natasha. The seemingly put together and highly successful real estate agent is tough, no nonsense, and icy, relying on her coke habit to keep up her energy to land sales and get her through the day. But the longer we spend with Natasha, the clearer it becomes that her cool, abrasive exterior is a front. She uses her pushy persona to evade a declined card payment at the dentist and makes a scene at a high-end café for lunch to avoid picking up the tab. But the harder she fights to maintain her image, the higher her debt rises. As if pressure isn’t already mounting, Natasha gets embroiled in a bizarre kidnapping after a friendly encounter with two men (Guy Burnet and Ryan Hayes) at a club.

No one could guess where Johnson, who co-wrote the script with Austin Collings, takes it from there. The filmmaker mines plenty of tension from Natasha’s constant scramble to tread water, ramping it up to a palpable degree by constantly adding more pressure. But cornering a terrified animal is never smart, and discovering where Natasha’s journey winds up leads to a ton of hellish, ultra-violent fun.

Maberly deftly navigates an impossible task of portraying the abrasive Natasha with authenticity, exposed flaws and all, without losing the audience. Especially as it’s her own greed that has led her to this point. But the morally dubious Natasha is such a fascinating character, as are the explored themes of projected image. Johnson’s enigmatic storytelling and stylized direction also help; the seedy underworld of London is as neon drenched as it is dark and grimy. That Johnson makes these two distinctive halves- the character study first half with an increasingly dark and violent thriller back half- feel cohesive and seamless is also no easy feat.

Once Mikael Persbrandt’s enigmatic character referred to only as “The Viking” enters the equation, the gloves come off, and Odyssey explodes fully into horror-thriller territory. The road getting there may prove divisive depending on how much you’re willing to follow Natasha on her downward spiral, and the slow-simmer could take a tighter edit. But the blood soaked finale is worth the wait.

Odyssey made its world premiere at SXSW. Release info TBD.

3.5 out of 5

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Reviews

‘Hungry’ Review – Finally, a Film Brave Enough to Call Out Hippos for the Monsters They Truly Are

Published

on

Hungry Review

When it comes to the animal attack subgenre of horror, there’s a hierarchy of sorts with the wildlife in question. Killer shark movies are easily the most ubiquitous, while alligators/crocodiles, dogs, bears, and snakes probably lead the rest of the pack.

It’s often worth paying attention, though, when a filmmaker targets a more atypical animal threat, including the likes of Jonathan King’s Black Sheep or Juan Piquer Simón’s Slugs. A new contender rumbles its way onto the screen this month, and while we all grew up thinking hippos are rotund cuties, the truth is far more frightening – this hippo is Hungry.

Sistine (Madison Davenport) and her best friend, Hannah (Olivia Bernstone), are enjoying a vacation in New Orleans, hoping to drown out their troubles back home. They sign up for an early morning bayou tour known for its alligator sightings and are joined by four other tourists and the boat’s skipper, Rodrigo (Michel Curiel). An uneventful trip sees Rodrigo take the group off the beaten path, but when an animal in the water capsizes their boat, the group finds themselves trapped in the swamp by something unexpected and deadly.

It’s a hippo. There’s a hippo in the bayou, and it’s not happy about all these pesky people.

From Joy Houck’s Creature from Black Lake to Walter Hill’s Southern Comfort to Adam Green’s Hatchet, the movies have warned us time and again not to go into the swampy bayous of Louisiana. Those cautionary tales are appreciated, though, as bigfoot, inbred hicks, and undead serial killers are a very real threat. But hippos? In the bayou? Well, that just seems silly.

And yet, Hungry plays its blubbery, big-toothed threat with deadly seriousness, and it’s all the better for it. “But Rob,” I can already hear some of you saying, “just yesterday you reviewed the new shark attack film, Chum, and said it suffered from taking itself too seriously. What gives?” For one thing, you’re misquoting me, but more importantly, the reference there was more of an observation on the animal attack subgenre successes as a whole. The “fun” ones tend to succeed more often than their more serious counterparts, but a dramatic and thrilling time can still be found with filmmakers who know what they’re doing.

Chum may be serious, but it’s also poorly written/performed, lacking in any degree of tension, devoid of personality, and so on. By contrast, Hungry lets its suspense build on the backs of engaging characters, good performances, and believable writing. Only one of its ensemble is obnoxious – a major feat for this kind of film – but even then, their motivations are both well-written and understandable.

The rest of the characters are people you’d be happy to see survive the night, and rather than looking forward to the next kill, director James Nunn and his cast leave us uncertain and nervous about who’s going to go belly up. The nervous business traveler wanting to get back to her kids? The family of three celebrating lost loved ones while on their vacation? Joaquim de Almeida’s Walker, an old hunter, is introduced saying, “The only cute hippo is a dead hippo,” so you pretty much know where he’ll end up.

To that end, the film teases out its hippo’s first appearance until well into the ninety-minute running time. We get ripples and splashes, but it’s only around the midway point that we get our first real look at the beast, and it looks fantastic. Nunn goes on to show the hippo in all its glory, and it’s a convincing antagonist brought to life through practical prosthetic effects and digital work. From the ear twitches to the beast’s giant maw opening wide with awe and malice, the hippo’s presence feels part of the action. There’s a tangible nature to it, something practical effects excel at while digital effects sometimes fail to convince of, and both succeed here with quality work from all involved.

While we get brief exteriors early on and some visually appealing drone shots, the bulk of the film unfolds on what looks to be a highly believable, set-dressed water tank (but could very well be an actual location, in which case, kudos to the team). It’s wholly convincing as a section of the bayou, complete with shoulder-high water and arching, twisting trees emerging into the sky. The film was shot in Malta, which is, coincidentally, where Chum was filmed as well.

Nunn, who also wrote Hungry, is now ten films deep into a fairly interesting career as a genre filmmaker. He’s made four movies with Scott Adkins, three of which are certified action bangers (with 2016’s Eliminators in particular being an underrated gem). He dipped a toe into the animal attack subgenre back in 2022 with the aforementioned Shark Bait, and it’s clear he learned some lessons from that endeavor, as its first hour is an engaging, attractively shot feature that sinks fast as soon as its poorly rendered shark becomes a lead character. Hungry improves on every aspect of that film, with its biggest step up being in regard to the effects.

If there’s an area or two where Hungry lacks bite, it’s in both its gore and its ending. There are numerous kills here, but the nature of the attacks and the choices made by Nunn mean none of them result in gory assaults or outcomes. We’re shown the torn apart corpse of an alligator early on, but most of the human kills see them attacked and dragged underwater, leaving nothing but a blood spill behind. Similarly, while the ending encounter satisfies, it still feels like it should have been a bigger confrontation. Neither of these aspects really hurt the film, but a bolstering of the gore and ending antics would have definitely upped the film’s ultimate entertainment value and rewatchability.

When all is said and done, Hungry is a genuinely solid animal attack film that succeeds in making its creature threat thrilling, entertaining, and, dare I say, educational? Title notwithstanding, the film acknowledges that hippos are vegetarians, meaning the five hundred or so people they kill every year – a true fact! – are slaughtered not out of hunger, but out of spite, self-defense, or a desire to play “land orca” while tossing around us fragile humans like we’re little more than seals in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Characters are grounded and engaging, the film moves well between suspense, character beats, and action, and the effects used to bring the hippo to life are highly effective and never feel like distractions. Drop those expectations of a Hungry Hungry Hippo romp, and settle in for a terrific little survival thriller about an angry, angry hippo instead.

Chomp chomp.

Hungry releases in select theaters today, June 3, before arriving on VOD on June 23, 2026.

3 skulls out of 5

Continue Reading