Connect with us

Editorials

“The Walking Dead” Season 7 Started Off Horrifying and Ended Beautifully

Published

on

My personal favorite season just reached a perfect conclusion.

When “The Walking Dead” returned to AMC for its seventh season back in October of last year, I was left stunned, shocked, and completely horrified by how far the show went to establish Negan as its most terrifying villain to date; and I wasn’t alone, as many viewers were so turned off by the Season 7 premiere’s barbaric violence that they vowed to stop watching altogether.

And it wasn’t hard to understand where they were coming from.

As long as I live, I will likely never forget the image of Glenn’s final moments, his eyeball literally hanging out of its socket as he said goodbye to Maggie, nor will I ever forget the gnarly visual of Abraham’s head literally exploding like a watermelon. And let’s not forget the look on Rick Grimes’ face as he was forced to witness those deeply disturbing acts; Andrew Lincoln’s incredible acting drove home just how horrifying and upsetting it all was. Rick was completely broken by Negan and, if I’m being honest, so was I back in October.

The first half of Season 7 was anything but joyful, but all the depression paved way for a deeply cathartic moment at the end of the mid-season finale: Rick and friends reunited, got their mojo back, and decided to take the fight directly to Negan. As I wrote back in December, Season 7’s first eight episodes formed the show’s best half-season story arc to date; and now that the entire picture has been painted, I feel pretty comfortable labeling Season 7 the best overall season in “The Walking Dead” history.

Last night’s Season 7 finale, ‘The First Day of the Rest of Your Life,’ was pure poetry from start to finish, capitalizing on seven years worth of storytelling to tie up the entire season and move the storyline into a new direction for Season 8. With everything that’s been going on, we (and the characters) have had precious little time to mourn the deaths of Abraham and Glenn, but the Greg Nicotero-directed finale delivered that sense of closure like only “The Walking Dead” can.

Of course, the biggest thing to happen was the death of Sasha, who sacrificed herself to give her friends family the upper hand in the battle against Negan. Sasha committed suicide by taking the death capsule that Eugene concocted for her; she willingly turned herself into a zombie for the greater good, making for a main character death the likes of which we’ve never quite seen before. It was a fitting and surprisingly beautiful end for a character who so often put herself on the line to protect others.

Sasha’s death also helped to put a touching and satisfying bow on the life of Abraham. Well-utilized flashbacks showed us the conversation with Abraham that ultimately led to Sasha’s huge sacrifice; Abraham told Sasha that the only real living was helping others. And really, that was the entire theme of the whole episode – a nail that was brilliantly hit on the head by the writers’ decision to weave the Season 7 finale into the show’s very first episode.

After they drove the Saviors out of Alexandria, Maggie delivered a poignant monologue about Glenn and the impact he had on, well, everyone and everything we’ve ever seen on the show. You may remember that Glenn saved Rick’s life in episode one of “The Walking Dead” back in 2010, and Maggie’s monologue put that into poetic context. Clutching Glenn’s pocket watch, given to him by her father, a pregnant Maggie heroically rallied the troops for battle by noting that the world was literally changed the moment that Glenn decided to lend Rick a hand.

Here’s the perfectly written (and delivered) speech in full:

The decision was made a long time ago. Before any of us knew each other. We were all strangers who would’ve just passed each other on the street before the world ended. And now we mean everything to each other. You were in trouble. You were trapped. Glenn didn’t know you, but he helped you. He put himself in danger for you. And that started it all. From Atlanta to my daddy’s farm to the prison to here. To this moment now. Not as strangers. As family. Because Glenn chose to be there for you that day a long time ago; that was the decision that changed everything. It started with both of you, and it just grew. All of this. To sacrifice for each other. To suffer, to stand, to grieve, to give, to love, to live. To fight for each other. Glenn made the decision, Rick. I was just following his lead.

The speech brought gravity not just to Sasha’s own sacrifice in the episode, but also to the deaths of both Abraham and Glenn. It was the perfect tribute to those three characters and really, to every character we’ve lost in the past 7 years that “The Walking Dead” has been on the air. Above all else, the show has always been about the characters and their relationships, and Season 7’s finale stressed just how important each and every one of those characters has been in the grand scheme. If you had been feeling that Glenn and Abraham weren’t properly eulogized by the show in the wake of their horrifying demises, well, it’s clear now that the writers were feeling the same way. And I can’t think of a more perfect tribute to our fallen heroes than the one we got last night.

No show on television right now does long form storytelling better than “The Walking Dead”; and if you’ve got the patience for it, oh boy is it powerful when it wants and needs to be. It wanted to be last night. It needed to be last night. And seven years of storytelling was just wrapped up so beautifully that I was moved to tears by the hope displayed by a group of characters who seemed to have been, just six months ago, irrevocably robbed of the slightest semblance of hope. It was a season-long, multi-character story arc that couldn’t possibly have been more well executed.

From beginning to end, Season 7 of “The Walking Dead” was truly masterful.

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has four awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading