Connect with us

Editorials

[Micah’s Mausoleum] Viva La VHS!!!

Published

on

A column where horror and nostalgia meet. Topics range from VHS, Vinyl, repertory screenings and a hodge-podge of anything else horror related that that harkens back to the days of yesteryear.

The VHS format rocks. Mono audio? Tracking issues? 4:3 picture? Bring it. Let me tell you why.

After a prolonged absence spanning most of the ‘00s until last year from watching films on VHS I decided to give the format a shot again. Like the transition from tapes to CDs, I quickly dropped VHS in favor of DVDs (and then later DVDs for Blu-ray). I suffer from early-adopter syndrome. That combined with the promise of higher quality home viewing it seemed an obvious progression, and it certainly is for the vast majority of films. However, there lives another breed of nearly forgotten films along with classics that demand to be seen on VHS.

Head inside for more!

I trace back my VHS revival to revival (aka repertory) screenings. I’ve attended hundreds of classic 35MM presentations of cult classics, films not even the most dedicated cinephile has even heard of, and just about everything in between. Those screenings are, without doubt, my favorite cinematic experiences (as long as the audience is there to enjoy the film, not mock it.) Even when the print is faded and the audio sucks it’s still a great time. I attended a screening of The Funhouse last year at Cinefamily in Los Angeles and I swear it looked like we were watching the flick through a goddamn lampshade. Still, that screening captured something that the streaming or DVD version can’t. There’s a rawness and grittiness or, as the French and Americans trying to be French say, a certain “Je ne sais quoi” to those old 35MM reels. This is something that I happily found out also translates to VHS.

Which brings me back to my decision to jump down the VHS rabbit hole. All it took was a trip to the Goodwill and six bucks. That visit netted me a VHS player and a rather old looking copy of Halloween. (It turned out to be an original release from MEDIA, a prominent distributor in the ‘80s and early ‘90s, which was founded none other than Charles Band of Full Moon and Wizard fame.) Seriously, six bucks to get going and the Goodwill was even playing that Macklemore song while I was there. Not even joking. Then I did some digging at home and came across an old box which contained the remnants of my VHS collection. This consisted of a tape of a family vacation to Alaska and for some unknown reason a copy of The Dentist 2 starring Corbin Bernsen. For reference, the best I can tell is I bought that tape new in 1998 and kept it with me through about 10 moves covering 3 states. One cannot simply get rid of Corbin.

I quickly discovered my inner collector had just found something “new” to set its laser focus on. Sure, I already collect original one sheet posters and even a few dolls (I mean bad ass macho action figures), but VHS was altogether a different beast. I was hooked on both the aesthetic box art and the actual joy of watching the films on the same format that I and many others had first enjoyed them on. From there it wasn’t long before I was scouring thrift stores, eBay and local shops for flicks I wanted. It also didn’t take long to realize that this endeavour would not always be so cheap. If you’re gonna collect VHS you might as well get the first editions, right?

Not too long after all of that I hosted an all-horror VHS night at my place and invited a few like-minded friends over. I arranged my rapidly growing VHS collection to mimic a Mom and Pop video rental shop that I named Micah’s Pick-a-Flick. I let guests peruse the collection before deciding on the evening’s picks. It was a Friday night straight outta 1995! The group settled on the absolutely awful Xtro 2 followed by the classic Stephen Dorph vehicle The Gate. We drank, ate boxed movie candies and had a freakin’ blast. Next time I think I’ll institute a ‘80s/’90s dress code. Wait. Did I just become a horror hipster? F*ck.

Kidding aside the night did evoke a strong sense of nostalgia and lengthy discussions about the days of renting videos based almost solely on the box art. Taking a chance on something you’ve never heard of. Discovering a gem amongst the crap, which is how I discovered Evil Dead — a night I will never forget. There’s something magical in those old box covers and tapes. Something that almost everyone who grew up during the home video boom remembers fondly. One of my friends brought up how the creatures in The Gate appeared scarier than they did on the HD version (formerly available on Netflix) due to the limits of VHS clarity. She was right.

And VHS appears destine to continue its comeback and not just in my apartment. The flick V/H/S and its soon-to-be-released sequel play on this trend by blending old and new formats rather cleverly. Numerous films are being released and re-released on VHS format (including the aforementioned V/H/S that sold out of its first U.S. VHS run in a few hours and whose UK PAL version commands serious quid on eBay.) Wizard Video unearthed a ton of original clamshell-sized VHS from their horror heyday and are re-releasing them (with newly duplicated VHS tapes.) And now in 2013 two documentaries focusing specifically on VHS are being unleashed (Rewind This! and Adjust Your Tracking). Rewind This! recently played to much success at SXSW. Adjust Your Tracking premieres on April 5th in Los Angeles at the Days of the Dead convention.

I asked one of the co-directors of Adjust Your Tracking, Dan Kinem, for his thoughts on VHS post-completion of his film. He had this to say:

“I feel like VHS is here to stay. For many it never truly left and for others it just took some time to remember how great it was. For as long as there are movies you can only watch on VHS I will always keep a VCR running. And for as long as there are people who remember growing up with VHS it will always hold a special place in their heart. Some of my earliest memories as a film fan are watching VHS so I’m never going to throw that away for any new format. I think the value of tapes that are truly rare is only likely to go up the older they become and I think marketing limited and collectible VHS, for the right types of movies, will continue. Fans of genre cinema love collectibles and in my cases the movies being marketed on tape nowadays works best on the format with the gritty, imperfect-look VHS provides. Collectors who are in it for the fad will die out eventually, but there will always be a hardcore fan base of collectors scouring the thrift stores and flea markets and looking on eBay at 3 am hoping to find a steal no one else has noticed. VHS will live forever.”

I’m in that latter group. I forgot how great VHS was. It’s a relationship that I once neglected, but going forward will cherish always.

So tell me: Has the VHS bug bitten you? Did you ever stop collecting? Are you down with new films on VHS? Do you remember a tape you used to watch over and over? Let’s chat.

Follow Micah on Twitter and make sure to check out Poster Collective, his movie poster specific site which is releasing a brand new limited edition screen print for the sic-fi classic, Metropolis, on April 5th.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading