Connect with us

Editorials

Before ‘Green Inferno,’ There Was ‘Cannibal Holocaust’

Published

on

As we gear up for the release of Eli Roth’s highly anticipated Green Inferno I thought it would be fun to take a look at the film that served as Roth’s greatest inspiration. Of course I’m taking about Cannibal Holocaust, which may very well be the most controversial film of all time.

Before diving into Cannibal Holocaust, I think it’s important to look at the cinema landscape of 1980, which was a very good year for the movies. The Empire Strikes Back, The Blues Brothers and Airplane! all dominated the box office. While the horror films from the year didn’t bring in as much cash, they were still incredibly good and successful in their own right. If you were a genre fan in 1980 you were presented with such treats as The Fog, Maniac, The Shining and Friday the 13th.

Italian horror in particular seemed to really thrive in 1980. The best of the best in terms of Italian filmmakers graced the big screen. Dario Argento returned with Inferno, a film that received little love upon release but has since risen to cult status. Lucio Fulci took us all to the City of the Living Dead. Not one to be outdone by Fulci, Umberto Lenzi invited us to the City of the Walking Dead, more commonly known as Nightmare City. A young Lamberto Bava began to hone his craft with his solo directorial debut, Macabre.

Ruggero Deodato may very well have been the busiest man of 1980. He ended the year with The House on the Edge of the Park, a film in which Deodato considers too violent, even by his standards. However, it was Deodato’s first film of the year that really ruffled some feathers and quite frankly pissed people off.

When Cannibal Holocaust was released in February of 1980 it certainly wasn’t the first cannibal film in existence. It wasn’t even the first cannibal film from Deodato. By this time the cannibal genre as we know it had been rolling along for almost a decade. I’m not sure what it was about 1980, maybe there was something in the air, but nearly 10 new entries would hit the subgenre with Cannibal Holocaust leading the way.

Cannibal Holocaust is a splendid display of exploitation. It’s gory and extremely brutal. It contains some of the most disturbing, disgusting imagery you’ll ever see and is honestly hard to watch at times. The film goes far beyond it’s gruesome surface with a depth most films lack. Cannibal Holocaust serves as a social commentary on the modern world at the time, which just so happens to be pretty relevant these days. It really is a terrific movie, but the basic structure, the meat and potatoes, that’s all pretty standard cannibal fare.

A group of tourists head out to the middle of a rainforest where they encounter a tribe of cannibals. 

Is this the plot to Cannibal Holocaust? Maybe it’s Lenzi’s Deep River Savages? Perhaps it’s the story to Roth’s Green Inferno? In a way it’s all three.

When you really break it down all cannibal films, including Cannibal Holocaust, can be summed up with a fairly generic plot synopsis like the one up above. This isn’t a bad thing or a knock on any cannibal movie. Within any genre, or in this case a subgenre, films are going to share characteristics and more often than not they are plot related. If Cannibal Holocaust wasn’t the first cannibal film, then why was it so special? Why didn’t any of the cannibal films from the eight years prior result in a public outcry? Why hasn’t any cannibal film since had the same impact?

There’s likely a number of answers to this question that you could easily build a case for. It could simply be that Cannibal Holocaust is the best of the genre. Maybe it’s the social commentary, but truthfully I think that’s present in most cannibal films, and horror films in general for that matter. Roth has already gone on record saying that Green Inferno takes a few social jabs. For me, the answer is easy. There’s one thing that rises Deodato’s masterpiece above the rest.

Presentation.

Cannibal Holocaust actually falls into two different horror subgenres – cannibal and found footage. It’s presented as a documentary. Passed off as if it’s real and some people thought it was! In fact, Deodato wanted people to believe it was real so much so that he had the actors sign agreements saying they would basically disappear for a year. They weren’t allowed to be in movies, television shows, commercials or any type of ad. This was to maintain the belief that they had been murdered on screen.

Cannibal Holocaust 2

Just think about how crazy that is for a second. Cannibal Holocaust was released on February 7, 1980. That’s 13 years before Man Bites Dog and 19 years before The Blair Witch Project. This was some serious next level thinking from Deodato. He may not have realized it at the time, but the impact this approach had has been astronomical. Since 2010 alone, there have been nearly 80 new entries into the found footage subgenre. An argument could be made that next to Jaws, Cannibal Holocaust is the most important film of all time.

A week and a half after the film premiered in Milan, Italian authorities seized it and quickly arrested Deodato for making a snuff film. Giving that the deaths look pretty damn real and the actors had not been seen or heard since can you really blame the authorities? Deodato had to demonstrate some of the special effects for the court and locate the actors to appear on his behalf. He was able to avoid life in prison but was still in some hot water.

The animal murders in Cannibal Holocaust are 100% real. Because of this the film was banned due to animal cruelty. Deodato defended his actions at the time, spending three years in court fighting for his film. In 1984 the court finally ruled in his favor and the ban was lifted. Of course numerous other countries around the world would continue their ban on the film, but this was a major victory for Deodato nonetheless.

In a 2010 interview with Electric Sheep Magazine, Deodato further stood by his actions. He argued that people have no problem eating animals so what’s wrong with seeing them killed?

“They don’t make the connection between the food on the table that mummy has cooked from the supermarket, and the fact the animal has actually been killed,” Deodato told Electric Sheep. “When you go to a Third World country people kill animals. I saw pigs and rabbits being killed growing up on a country farm when I was young. My son has not seen this because times have changed, he hasn’t had the experiences I have, for him it all comes pre-packed.”

Agree with him or not, you must admit Deodato makes some excellent points. We live in a society ripe with hypocrisy. I could certainly do without seeing the murder of animals on film, but then I willingly eat meat so who am I to say they shouldn’t be there?

35 years after it’s initial release and Cannibal Holocaust is just as relevant and groundbreaking as ever. Aside from being highly controversial, Cannibal Holocaust is extremely influential and that influence stretches far beyond the cannibal subgenre. The previously mentioned Blair Witch Project owes just as much to Cannibal Holocaust as the Green Inferno does. Hell, it’s not even subject to just horror films these days. David Ayer released a crime drama that likely wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for Cannibal Holocaust.

Deodato paved the way for these films. It’s time we stop looking at Cannibal Holocaust as merely an outrageous movie intending to shock and stir up controversy, and instead see it for it truly is as one of the most important pieces of cinema to ever exist.

Chris Coffel is originally from Phoenix, AZ and now resides in Portland, OR. He once scored 26 goals in a game of FIFA. He likes the Phoenix Suns, Paul Simon and 'The 'Burbs.' Oh and cats. He also likes cats.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading