Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Omen’ Was Released 40 Years Ago Today

Published

on

The Omen 40th Anniversary

Richard Donner’s seminal horror film The Omen was released in the United States on June 25, 1976 (the UK release was wisely set on 6/6/76). The Academy Award-winning film (for Jerry Goldsmith’s score) was the fifth highest grossing film of 1976 and has become one of the most influential horror films of all time.

***SPOILERS for a 40-year-old film below.***

As many of you know, The Omen tells the story of Robert and Katherine Thorn and their son Damien. Robert, an American ambassador, hastily adopts a male child when his own is murdered by a Satanic cult (he is told the child was stillborn by the doctor who is in cahoots with the cult). Damien is revealed to be the Antichrist and nearly two hours later Robert and Katherine are dead and Satan wins. That’s The Omen in a nutshell.

That is, of course, a very abbreviated summary of The Omen, but you get what I’m saying. The Omen was an enormous success when it came out. Three years after The Exorcist and, while it didn’t make even half of what that film made, it still pulled in a respectable amount of money. The Omen went on to gross $60.9 million. While the production budget is unknown, the marketing budget was $2.8 millon.

The film boasts two of the best set pieces ever put in a horror film. The first of which is the Thorns’ nanny hanging herself in view of all the children at Damien’s birthday party, and the second of which is the decapitation of the character portrayed by David Warner. While the film doesn’t rely on gore, there is plenty of shocking imagery present throughout the film to terrify baboon (the baboon scene is particularly memorable).

So successful was The Omen that a sequel was inevitable, and two years later Damien: The Omen II was released. That film would go on to gross less than half what the original film made and still a third and “final” film was made. Omen III: The Final Conflict saw a release in March 1981 and a box office gross of $20 million. 10 years ago, a remake starring Liev Schreiber and Julia Stiles was released on June 6, 2006 (best release date ever) to mixed reviews, but still managed to earn back double its budget at the domestic box office.

I remember watching The Omen for the first time. I was about 17 and my jaw nearly hit the floor when Mrs. Baylock pushed Katherine out of the hospital window. You have to understand that at the time I had no idea what the film was about other than the fact that it was about an evil kid that happened to be the Antichrist. I naturally assumed Lee Remick would play a much larger role in the film than she ended up playing, so her death so early in the film really shook me. What sets The Omen apart from The Exorcist is that while it features less shocking imagery than William Friedkin’s masterpiece, it lets the devil win (until the end of The Final Conflict, anyway).  It’s just not something I was expecting and that ending still sticks with me to this day.

What are your thoughts on The Omen? Share your thoughts and memories in the comments below!

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading