Connect with us

Editorials

[Editorial] Horror Doesn’t Have to Scare YOU to Be Horror

Published

on

Most common comment we receive? “This isn’t a horror movie.” Let’s talk about that.

I’ve been writing for Bloody Disgusting for nearly two years now, for various other horror websites (starting with my own personal blog) for the past ten years, and I’ve been an active member of the online horror community for even longer. I spend most of my non-writing time interacting with fellow fans on social media, and one thing has become immediately clear to me in recent years: horror fans, by and large, aren’t quite sure what makes a horror movie, well, a horror movie.

Granted, there are certain films that are more action than horror and perhaps even more comedy than horror, which can make it tough to pin those movies down to one specific genre. But the sheer number of bona fide horror films that I’ve seen horror fans dismiss as “not horror movies” over the course of the past couple years, in particular, is staggering. Nearly every critically acclaimed horror film in recent years has been banished by a vocal group of fans, including The Babadook, It Follows, The Witch, Split and most recently, the now Oscar-nominated Get Out. The list goes on.

I recently penned a bit of a love letter to Mike Flanagan’s Before I Wake here on BD, and that too was dismissed in the comments section as being something less or something more than a horror film, depending on who was commenting. Some expressed that Before I Wake‘s focus on human drama made it *more* than a mere horror film – whatever the hell that really means – while others outright dismissed that it was even a horror movie at all. After all, if a movie can impact you on a deep emotional level, it surely can’t be a scary movie… right?

You can’t see my face right now, but I’m definitely rolling my eyes.

As for Get Out, which made headlines once again today for scoring multiple Academy Awards nominations, including Best freakin’ Picture, I was not at all surprised to see that our article about today’s big time victory resulted in a flurry of comments pointing out that no, actually, Get Out isn’t a horror movie. It’s a statement I’m having a lot of trouble even wrapping my head around, as the Get Out I saw was mostly definitely a horror film. Same goes for every aforementioned film, as well as nearly every film that comes up in this particular conversation – The Silence of the Lambs, to date the only horror film to ever win Best Picture, is still fighting the internet battle that Get Out is currently at the center of.

So where did so many horror fans get this idea that “horror” is a tiny box that only very specific films fit inside of, when horror has ALWAYS been a wide open playing field that allows writers and filmmakers to explore all facets of the human condition and experience? More specifically, why is Night of the Living Dead unquestionably a horror film, while a movie like Get Out is up for hot button social media debate? I’ve pondered questions such as these for quite some time, and the conclusion I’ve drawn is that it often comes down to one thing for many horror fans:

If it didn’t scare ME, it’s not a horror movie!”

Take last year’s IT, for example, an adaptation of a terrifying Stephen King novel about a killer clown who literally eats children. Unquestionably a horror film, right? Well, believe it or not, I had many fans explain to me last year that IT actually wasn’t a horror movie! Whether they called it a “thriller,” a “supernatural fantasy,” a “dark drama” or whatever other description they were able to come up with to distance one of the genre’s biggest success stories from the genre they hold so near and dear, the sentiment that was driving those comments seemed to have been entirely derived from the fact that those fans simply were not scared by the movie. And if the killer clown movie didn’t scare them, then it wasn’t truly a horror movie.

It’s fine if any of the movies I’ve mentioned in this article didn’t scare you – what scares one person isn’t always going to scare another, it’s only natural – but to scrub them from the genre simply because they didn’t work for you, on whatever level, is to do a huge disservice to the genre at large. And if you’re going to take the stance that a horror movie, in order to be a true horror movie, needs to avoid focusing on human drama or imparting any social commentary, then guess what? George Romero didn’t make horror movies. Wes Craven didn’t either.

“Horror” is more than “killer in the woods chasing down topless teenagers,” SO MUCH MORE, and I can’t help but get a little depressed whenever an incredible horror movie is dismissed by so many fans simply because it dared to do something more than slice, dice and spew blood all over the screen. There are no rules within the horror genre, which is really the most wonderful thing about the genre. Justin Benson and Aaron Moorehead’s Spring and Guillermo del Toro’s The Shape of Water may have been love stories above all else, but are they not still monster movies at the end of the day? Do they lose the right to call themselves creature features simply because there’s something more to them?

More than anything, “Horror” is a tone. A feeling. An umbrella for endless sub-genres. A deeply versatile means through which filmmakers can exorcise the demons we all deal with on a daily basis. George Romero’s flesh-eating zombies can be found in your local mall any day of the week. If you’ve been paying any attention to the news, you’d know that Jordan Peele’s racists are unfortunately all around us. Jennifer Kent’s Babadook? A representation of our grief. The titular “it” in David Robert Mitchell’s It Follows? That inescapable feeling of adolescence being shattered by the realization that death is breathing down our neck. These are all horror movies. All wonderful explorations of what horror can be, when filmmakers respect the genre enough to do more than grab the lowest hanging fruit it has to offer.

It’s time we all have that same level of respect for the genre we love. For the endless possibilities it provides. For the movies smart enough to explore those possibilities.

Slasher movies are great. But horror is so much more than blood and guts.

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has four awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading