Connect with us

Movies

Monsters (limited)

“It might not feature the Kaiju Big Battel backdrop that most might hope for, but it is an exceptional film in its own right, even if that doesn’t include being a grade-A horror film.”

Published

on

When it comes to horror films, there are a few central complaints that everyone makes about why many of them turn out so lackluster. But one of the big – and most prevalent – reasons is that there isn’t enough emphasis on plot and compelling characters. And if you find that’s normally your beef with the increasingly large number of dreadful duds, then perhaps MONSTERS is the film you’ve been searching for. That is, if you don’t mind it really not being a horror film.

What it is, however, is a fairly thought-provoking tale about the human condition and an entertaining romantic drama road movie that just happens to have a sci-fi horror setting. Several years after a probe crash lands in a Mexican region, it becomes infested with giant monsters and is dubbed an “infected zone.” The creatures are Lovecraftian – read: tentacled – and quite large, leaving a path of devastation wherever they go. Oh, and they also discharge hazardous fumes that are deadly to humans, which causes pretty much everyone living in, or around, the infected zones to wear gas masks. The presentation of the creatures is what proves the most ambitious and noteworthy about them: director Gareth Edwards has a background in digital effects so he created and animated the CGI creatures by himself. He also chose to show them as little as possible, only giving them about 20 minutes total of screen time – and that might even be overestimating it a bit. What he does with this tactic is give the creatures an almost omnipresent sense of dread by merely showing the destruction and human anguish left in their wake.

Enter photojournalist Andrew (Scoot McNairy), who is traveling through central Mexico, chronicling the monsters descent on our planet and society’s reaction to it. Moments into the film, he gets a call from his boss, who orders him to escort his lovely daughter, Samantha (Whitney Able), back to America safely. After their passports are stolen and they can’t take the ferry back home, the two hire a tour guide and travel the dangerous path directly through the monsters’ stomping grounds.

The growing relationship between our two main characters through their treacherous journey home is the real meat of the flick, which gives McNairy and Able plenty of time to shine in their roles. They’re practically the only characters in the film – everyone else might as well have “cannon fodder” written across their forehead – and as it goes on, their relationship progresses very organically. It’s really the subtler touches and small bits of dialogue that make their journey refreshingly realistic; in fact, it’s really the desolation of the humans they see along the way that makes their attraction to each other much more, dare I say, touching.

There’s too much ambition and heart in MONSTERS to have a meandering middle stretch completely discredit it. Not only does it create a very realistic post-apocalyptic world on an extremely modest budget, it also says a lot about the world we live in and the kindness people exude after a disaster occurs. It might not feature the Kaiju Big Battel backdrop that most might hope for, but it is an exceptional film in its own right, even if that doesn’t include being a grade-A horror film.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Movies

’28 Years Later’ – Ralph Fiennes, Jodie Comer, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson Join Long Awaited Sequel

Published

on

28 Days Later, Ralph Fiennes in the Menu
Pictured: Ralph Fiennes in 'The Menu'

Danny Boyle and Alex Garland (AnnihilationMen), the director and writer behind 2002’s hit horror film 28 Days Later, are reteaming for the long-awaited sequel, 28 Years Later. THR reports that the sequel has cast Jodie Comer (Alone in the Dark, “Killing Eve”), Aaron Taylor-Johnson (Kraven the Hunter), and Ralph Fiennes (The Menu).

The plan is for Garland to write 28 Years Later and Boyle to direct, with Garland also planning on writing at least one more sequel to the franchise – director Nia DaCosta is currently in talks to helm the second installment.

No word on plot details as of this time, or who Comer, Taylor-Johnson, and Fiennes may play.

28 Days Later received a follow up in 2007 with 28 Weeks Later, which was executive produced by Boyle and Garland but directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. Now, the pair hope to launch a new trilogy with 28 Years Later. The plan is for Garland to write all three entries, with Boyle helming the first installment.

Boyle and Garland will also produce alongside original producer Andrew Macdonald and Peter Rice, the former head of Fox Searchlight Pictures, the division of one-time studio Twentieth Century Fox that originally backed the British-made movie and its sequel.

The original film starred Cillian Murphy “as a man who wakes up from a coma after a bicycle accident to find England now a desolate, post-apocalyptic collapse, thanks to a virus that turned its victims into raging killers. The man then navigates the landscape, meeting a survivor played by Naomie Harris and a maniacal army major, played by Christopher Eccleston.”

Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer) is on board as executive producer, though the actor isn’t set to appear in the film…yet.

Talks of a third installment in the franchise have been coming and going for the last several years now – at one point, it was going to be titled 28 Months Later – but it looks like this one is finally getting off the ground here in 2024 thanks to this casting news. Stay tuned for more updates soon!

Continue Reading