Connect with us

Editorials

‘Demons of the Mind’ Shines 50 Years Later as a Fresh and Distinct Hammer Horror Gem [Hammer Factory]

Published

on

Welcome to the Hammer Factory. This month we dissect Demons of the Mind (1972).

While Hammer Studios has been in business since 1934, it was between 1955 and 1979 that it towered as one of the premier sources of edgy, gothic horror. On top of ushering the famous monsters of Universal’s horror heyday back into the public eye, resurrecting the likes of Frankenstein, Dracula and the Mummy in vivid color, the studio invited performers like Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing, Ingrid Pitt and so many more to step into the genre limelight. Spanning a library housing over 300 films, Hammer Studios is a key part of horror history that until recently has been far too difficult to track down.

In late 2018, Shout Factory’s Scream Factory line began to focus on bringing Hammer’s titles to disc in the US, finally making many of the studio’s underseen gems available in packages that offered great visuals as well as insightful accompanying features. Over the course of this column, I will focus on these releases, gauging the films in context of the Hammer Studio story as well as analyzing the merits of the release. It’s time to highlight the power, impact and influence of Hammer Studios and ignite new conversation surrounding some forgotten classics.


The Context

While Hammer had built its reputation on a foundation of gothic horror, classic monsters and marketable stars, the demands of the 1970’s genre audience challenged their tried-and-true production strategies sparking change and innovation. With a desire to expand the scope of their talent both on screen and off, Michael Carreras and his son and successor James turned their attention to sources outside of their usual circles for pitches and potential productions.

Having worked with the studio tangentially by penning the lyrics to the title song “Strange Love” for Lust for a Vampire (1971), producer Frank Godwin was one such fresh face. Along with prolific screenwriter Christopher Wicking, who had penned AIP favorites The Oblong Box (1969) and Cry of the Banshee (1970) along with Hammer’s own Blood from the Mummy’s Tomb (1971), Godwin approached Hammer with a concept based on a legend of his own fabrication.

Claiming that he read about it in a museum in Germany, Godwin pitched the story Blutlust. A 17th century folk tale chronicling high born families prone to incest and cursed with polluted blood, those infected were supposedly driven by the full moon to revitalize themselves by devouring human flesh. Godwin claimed that the only recourse was to sever the left hand, sapping the soiled blood and to finally drive a cross aflame into the heart of the impure. Based on the story, a screenplay was ordered and a poster commissioned with the intention of leaning on a lycanthropic angle to provide the film a monster to capitalize on in its campaign.

Wicking wrote Blood Will Have Blood in response, a Shakespeare reference that went over producer’s heads and was ultimately altered due to the overuse of the word “blood” in the title. It was a script that expanded upon Hammer’s tradition of gothic moviemaking, embracing moral ambiguity in the face of conservative righteousness and seeking out psychological terror in the place of monsters and cavernous castles. Steeped in metaphor and melodrama, what became Demons of the Mind (1972) was truly an original, modern take on the classical gothic and more in line with Roger Corman’s AIP Edgar Allan Poe cycle of films than anything Hammer had made with Frankenstein or Dracula in the title.

Peter Sykes was invited to direct in light of his horror film Venom (1971) and Hammer staple Arthur Grant was brought on as cinematographer in what would be his final credited film. Casting had its complications as Eric Porter, James Mason and Paul Scofield all turned down the leading role of Zorn before Robert Hardy finally accepted the mantle. Elizabeth was cast as Marianne Faithfull but she too had to be substituted at the last minute with Gillian Hills, as her openness about her drug use made it impossible to insure her on set. The casting delays pushed production back several months. In the meantime, Michael Carreras requested the removal of all werewolf adjacent narrative components for fear of a similarly poor box office reception to Hammer’s only other werewolf outing The Curse of the Werewolf (1961).

When all was said and done Demons of the Mind emerged as a fresh and distinct imagining of Hammer’s traditional gothic style. With Sykes’ experimental, strikingly beautiful visuals and Wicking’s anthropological approach to the mythology, characters and science of the story, the atmospheric poeticism of the classic gothic evolved onscreen, ready to meet a new audience. Unfortunately, distributor Anglo-EMI had ordered a Hammer movie and had received a movie which lacked all of the studio’s hallmarks. It seemed the very elements which made it artistically successful would be its commercial doom.

The film was shelved for over a year and finally released as the bottom half of a double bill with gratuitous slasher Tower of Evil (1972). It wouldn’t see US distribution until 1974 and would ultimately land to unenthusiastic reviews, relegated to the exploitation drive-in circuit. It would take decades for Demons of the Mind to be rediscovered and reappraised, finding acknowledgment long after the studio it was meant to help rejuvenate had met its unfortunate demise.

Still, few of Hammer’s efforts, especially those that came in its final years, represent the metamorphosis and creative revolution the studio was capable of like Demons of the Mind. A Freudian psychological terror that bridged the smaller thrillers and grander gothic pictures of Hammer’s past, ushering in a new, almost modern approach that might’ve welcomed the sort of audience that Hammer Studios so desperately needed had it been given the chance.


The Film

“‘Blood will have blood,’ they say. Well, there must be no more blood on our souls.”

A bustling carriage makes its way through the wood as its driver whips the horses to haste. A young woman inside reaches through the window but is pulled back by her caretaker who forces medicine upon her. The young woman’s consciousness blurs as the surrounding world dilutes as though filtered through a watery prism. Visions begin to penetrate the carriage ride as the woman finds herself running through the trees, disoriented and afraid, before coming upon a young man and a cottage. The ride continues as the burgeoning romance flashes in and out of the young woman’s memory, finally halted by a hulking man and the carriage in question. She’s taken to an old manor where her father awaits, praying over his deceased wife’s grave and pleading that his flesh and blood might bring him light instead of darkness.

From the beginning, Demons of the Mind is a different breed of Hammer horror movie. With its quiet, introspective and near wordless opening, the film ushers in a psychological undercurrent that moves hand in hand with the mesmerizing visuals. Taking full advantage of Christopher Wicking’s thought provoking script and Arthur Grant’s eye for lush visualization, director Peter Sykes uses every frame and set piece to tell a story in pictures and mood, crafting a metaphorical fantasy-like gothic the likes of which Hammer had never seen.

The story concerns Baron Zorn, a repressed man of a long decayed nobility, torn asunder by the neurotic madness that can only come from generations of incest and isolation. Convinced of a centuries-old evil that plagues his bloodline, Zorn imprisons his incestuous children, Emil and Elizabeth, and hires a doctor named Falkenberg to help root out the psychological demons inhabiting the minds of his accursed offspring. All the while, the nearby village is under assault from an unknown killer targeting young women who bear a striking resemblance to Elizabeth.

Channeling themes of class, generational trauma and corruption, the story offers a modernized, allegorical approach to the conventional gothic dynamic. Mental and intellectual complexity accompany key sequences, like when Zorn is being hypnotized by Falkenberg with a slowly rotating candle as images of violence and sexual duress play with liquidity over Zorn’s struggling eyes. It’s this sequence that sheds light on the origins of Emil and Elizabeth’s manias, for it reveals that Zorn’s wife killed herself in front of them after years of forced sexual repression and mental abuse.

The cast is made up of performers mostly new to Hammer, an effort that was purposeful and perhaps detrimental to its eventual release. Robert Hardy plays Zorn, a role akin to Vincent Price’s Roderick Usher and one that might have been better suited to Peter Cushing or Christopher Lee had Hammer been willing to consider it. Hardy’s take is heightened and exaggerated, at times feeling like an unflattering imitation of a gothic horror patriarch rather than an authentic performance embodying one. While serviceable throughout and a fine actor on the whole, Hardy’s turn in Demons of the Mind is easily its weakest element.

Conversely, Shane Briant and Gillian Hills are wonderful as Emil and Elizabeth. Briant’s lustful desperation and emotional confusion comes through with every pale and pathetic glance while Hills’ otherworldly disconnectedness and fluctuating emotional frailty shimmers throughout the film. Patrick Magee as Falkenberg is also a standout. Based on the real life story of German physician Franz Mesmer, Magee brings a pointed confidence and acuity for curiosity that a man pushing the boundaries of human understanding and consciousness would most certainly require. Rounding out the core cast is the great Yvonne Mitchell’s Aunt Hilda, obeying Zorn’s insane demands with cult-like belief and understated pathos.

Instead of supplemental, the nearby village serves as its own world, separate from the walls Zorn has constructed around himself. In this way, the film can explore the greater impact of the murders and the belief systems which arise to protect those that do not have the luxury of wealth or title. A traveling Priest presides there, played wonderfully by Michael Hordern, Hellbent on ridding the village of the terror that haunts it. There’s even a sequence depicting a ritualistic ceremony, born out of actual practices, complete with chanting, jeering and the burning of a pagan totem in the face of the village’s most sexually active occupant Inge, as portrayed by Virginia Wetherell. The scene is the type of proto-folk horror that one might expect to find in The Blood on Satan’s Claw (1971) or The Wicker Man (1973) and serves to further diversify the genre-bending approach Demons of the Mind takes to gothic horror.

Even the death sequences are handled with artistic care as the killer always sprinkles the bodies with rose petals, calling attention to the fragility and beauty of life and the physical form. The flowers seem to represent the stunting of a life in bloom, the pieces of potential lost in blood red shreds just as they achieve peak physicality. Emil is soon revealed to be the perpetrator, murdering Inge in the heat of passion after he was tricked into believing she was his sister Elizabeth.

The crux of his violent acts hangs on one fact. His broken, forbidden lust for his sister drives him to seek women who resemble Elizabeth. The truth of who they are shatters his fantasy and then he kills.

The film climaxes and concludes in tragedy, a nihilistic finish that has our fractured protagonists find no reward. Carl, played somewhat blandly by Paul Jones, is the closest thing the film has to a traditional hero, but he amounts to a non-entity in the film, an afterthought and reverie for Elizabeth to cling to but that offers little comfort against the horrors of her heritage. It’s a decision that feels purposeful and in line with the motivations of the story— it’s not about good triumphing over evil, rather the poisonousness of hysteria and its capacity for ruination.

Demons of the Mind contains some of the most grotesque and affecting sequences in Hammer’s canon, but not because of the onscreen effects. Rather, it’s the burrowing nature of its psychological horrors that make it so affecting along with the dreamy lyricism of its visual pallet. Like Elizabeth’s disorienting carriage ride in its opening moments, the film is a vision dancing in and out of darkness and light, unable to find footing in either shadow or sun.


The Special Features

This release comes equipped with the 2017 StudioCanal transfer that was released in the UK in its 1.66:1 aspect ratio. The transfer handles contrast well, accenting both the shadows and vibrant splashes of color that coexist throughout. The DTS-HD Master Mono track is crisp, servicing the dialogue and atmospheric score. A solid presentation for this underrated gem from Hammer’s vast catalogue.

Audio Commentary, by Steve Haberman

(Shout! Factory, 2020)

Author and film historian Steve Haberman returns to deliver an insightful track chronicling the history of the production and the many creatives who coalesced to bring the film together. He details Frank Godwin’s faux legend of Blutlust and the way in which Christopher Wicking and Peter Sykes transformed it into what would become Demons of the Mind. He provides a detailed history of the actors and crew along with his own personal analysis of the film’s themes and evolved gothic stylings. It’s a wonderful, informative listen that any fan of Hammer or the film would benefit from hearing.

Audio Commentary, by Director Peter Sykes, Writer Christopher Wicking, Actress Virginia Wetherell— Moderated by Author Film Historian Jonathan Scott

(Anchor Bay, 2002)

Ported over from the original US DVD release, this commentary collects many of the film’s key creatives to provide a more anecdotal history of Demons of the Mind. Virginia Wetherell recalls working with Stanley Kubrick and Peter Sykes muses on the creative decisions at work on the screen, not to mention the purported criminal who owned the manor they were shooting in. From Christopher Wicking’s dealings with Vincent Price at AIP to his efforts to connect Hammer with Marvel Comics, a great deal of stories are told. It’s a fun and fascinating track that offers an inside look into the film, the studio and the industry at the time.

Blood will have blood: Inside Demons of the Mind (15:42)

(StudioCanal, 2017)

A collection of renowned Hammer historians, including Kevin Lyons, Jonathan Rigby, Alan Barnes and John Johnston, discuss the film and its place in Hammer history on this brief reflection ported over from the UK StudioCanal release of the film. Beginning with the disparate elements that formulated the script to the film’s eventual issues with release and distribution, this high level discussion covers a lot of ground. As is usual with these types of vignettes, it offers a satisfying and digestible overview.

Interview with Camera Operator Neil Binney (3:41)

(Shout! Factory, 2019)

Excised from an interview that was included on Shout! Factory’s release of Blood From the Mummy’s Tomb, this chat with Neil Binney provides a short and sweet recollection. He recalls shooting the rotating candle, issues with laughing on set and the consummate professionalism of Arthur Grant. It’s quick and airy, but a nice inclusion.

Theatrical Trailer (2:57)

“What madness lies like a curse upon this family?” the voice asks as people hurry down a hallway while a caretaker fumbles with keys in hot pursuit. Images of a man cornering a woman in the woods and a spinning candle accompanied by odd, off-putting music passes by whilst the same voice speaks of secrets and conspiracies binding brother and sister together. A pagan ritual unfolds “as old as the druids” as the players are introduced with title cards, leading to the bold, red words: A NIGHTMARE OF TERROR. An eye fills the frame as a girl runs out of breath in the background— DEMONS OF THE MIND.


Final Thoughts

Despite Hammer’s efforts to escape their gothic laden past as the 1970’s dawned, it seems that their future could well have been solidified in embracing and progressing their foundational design rather than suppressing it. The creatives behind Demons of the Mind understood that sentiment, even if the studio and distributors did not.

Shout! Factory preserves this piece of somewhat forgotten Hammer history for the US audience in a release that ports over the transfer and special features from the StudioCanal UK Blu-ray of the film. Steve Haberman’s commentary track is the standout benefit of the disc, arriving as an invaluable resource to those seeking to understand the machinations and thematics of the film and its production. All told, this is a fine release and an essential title for any Hammer enthusiast’s collection.

Over the years, Hammer’s horror films delved ever deeper into the murky depths of morality and the magnetic allure of the occult. Still, their key titles and directors tended to stick to more conservative perspectives, as is the case in something like Terrence Fisher’s The Devil Rides Out (1968). While the 1970s brought about the studio’s downfall, it also marked the exciting collision of their classic “Golden Age” methodologies with a more modernized approach to psychological terror that traversed far more ground than “right” or “wrong”.

With movies like Countess Dracula (1971), Twins of Evil (1971) and eventually Captain Kronos: Vampire Hunter (1974), Hammer was combining fresh voices with their signature style and forging new genre possibilities out of tired trends. Demons of the Mind is further proof that, even toward the end, Hammer was a studio with something to add to the broader creative conversation and one can’t help but wonder what might’ve been had the audience been given the opportunity to properly hear what they had to say.

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading