Connect with us

Editorials

‘Curse of Chucky’ – Celebrating the Unlikely Franchise Revival Ten Years Later

Published

on

Curse of Chucky

I don’t need to inform anyone that mainstream Hollywood entertainment is still in the grips of a franchise and IP based fervor. Mega franchises, sequels, reboots, requels, remakes – all of these have been the lion’s share of high profile releases for well over a decade now. Everything from the most recognizable franchises in film history to more niche pop cultural artifacts have been resurrected, dusted off, and had a new coat of paint air-brushed on.

Every day across social media the online film community seems to litigate “the state” of Hollywood.

Superhero fatigue. Franchise fatigue. You know the discourse. Personally, I take as much of a nonchalant attitude with all this stuff as I can. I have my peccadillos. I have my areas of agreement regarding “the state” of Hollywood. But at the end of the day I’m just…a dude. A dude who just wants to watch movies and hopefully have as good a time as I can doing it. All of the fracas regarding the industry is, at the end of the day, mostly noise to me.

If a movie looks good, I’ll see it. That goes for Superhero Movie #852 or the latest under the radar indie gaining buzz.

So what does all of this waffle have to do with Curse of Chucky? Well, relatively speaking, I consider Curse one of the most successful franchise reboots we’ve gotten since the trend kicked off in earnest all the back in 2005 with Batman Begins.

Yes, I’m serious.

Best Netflix Horror

After almost a decade off screen, our favorite ginger-haired killer doll came back with the 6th installment in the Child’s Play series after the critical and commercial failure of Seed of Chucky. Franchise creator and steward Don Mancini stands by Seed, and since its release it has gained more appreciation over the years for its daffy, dark, and whacked out satirical looniness. It was clear, however, that Curse would be the first movie in the franchise to go straight-to-video/VOD, and the history of horror franchises that once occupied theaters being relegated to straight-to-video carries with it a certain stigma of cheapness and cynicism. Going from the big screen to the small screen is a sure sign that your franchise has officially run out of gas.

Then something unexpected happened. Curse of Chucky started getting good buzz after its Fantasia Fest premiere. It was largely hailed as a return to form, an unexpectedly confident and clever comeback from a once-popular horror franchise everyone had put in the rearview.

Like many successful reboots of the past 15 years, Curse took a drastically different approach with its tone, with Mancini stripping the story down to a cast of core characters, one location, and an emphasis on making Chucky sinister again.

Working with a lower budget and short shooting schedule, Curse of Chucky is crafted as a Gothic horror. There are clear Dario Argento-esque influences on display here in regards to camera work and lighting. This is a well shot, stylish film and despite some rough around the edges effects work, it could have easily been released in theaters.

But how does Curse of Chucky go about rebooting the franchise? Well, by continuing the franchise.

Nica (Fiona Dourif) is a paraplegic young woman who lives with her mother Sarah (Chantal Quesnelle) in a sprawling, secluded house. One day they receive a package containing a Good Guy Doll. Not knowing who sent it or why, Nica decides to give it to her niece Alice (Summer Howell) as a gift. That night Nica discovers Sarah dead from an apparent suicide.

But we know it wasn’t a suicide.

Nica’s sister Barb (Danielle Bisutti), niece Alice, husband Ian (Brennan Elliott), nanny Jill (Maitland McConnell), and local priest and family friend Father Frank (A Martinez) arrive for the funeral and to support Nica.

Soon family drama, old resentments, secrets, and bodies all start to pile up as Chucky’s beef with this family is revealed.

Curse of Chucky

Mancini makes a bold move in keeping Chucky silent and his movement off-camera for half the film. We mostly see him playing the ‘Toy Story’ game as he enacts his sinister plan. We know it’s Chucky. We know he’s alive. Keeping the audience so far ahead of the characters in a story can knee-cap a film before it even takes off, but the rub here is waiting for the why.

Fiona Dourif as Nica is an instantly likable and easy to root for protagonist and the family drama that unravels throughout the film is filled with Mancini’s darkly humorous touch. The cliche of “is dad sleeping with the nanny?” is subverted with a smirk and characters you may expect to hate end up actually having a bit more dimension to them.

Who really fares best here is Chucky as a character. Fans often gripe about the rough around the edges design and effects work in Curse not being near on par with the theatrically released films. He’s less expressive and has a far more plastic sheen to him than the earlier films. The animatronic work is just a bit more basic, but it’s still recognizable as Chucky and it’s still good work for a direct-to-video/VOD film.

The character himself gets back to his darker roots as a plotting and scheming villain who relishes in the pain – both mental and physical, that he imparts on his victims. Brad Dourif hasn’t lost a thing since he began playing the character since the original film, and for my money Curse is probably the most genuinely scary Chucky has been since Child’s Play 2.

Despite the film being largely well received, it does irk some fans who feel Chucky’s motivation in the film is lackluster and commits the sin of adding backstory where none is needed.

It’s revealed through flashback that before his death, Chucky befriended Nica’s mother while Nica was in the womb. He develops an obsession with Sarah, kills her husband and kidnaps her, expressing a desire to become a family. The police find his hideout. Assuming Sarah somehow tipped the cops off, Chucky stabs Sarah in the stomach (which causes Nica’s paralysis) and flees. He’s chased to the toy store and gunned down on that fateful night in the 80s.

On one hand I understand this new exposition dump being hard to swallow for some. This is a significant retcon for the series as a whole, but it’s not entirely out of the realm of verisimilitude in my opinion, as one of the more interesting quirks of Chucky as a slasher icon is that he had a whole life before he possessed the Good Guy Doll. He was out and about with his own history as a flesh and blood serial killer well before his second life as a murderous toy, leaving his past a bit more open for exploring in ways that don’t feel hacky or reaching.

The delivery of this exposition is a bit undercooked, however. Perhaps if Mancini teased it out a bit more throughout the narrative it would have landed better, or even if he dedicated a bit more screen time to the flashback- but as it stands it’s an admirable, if somewhat sloppy, new wrinkle in Chucky’s story that injected new potential moving forward.

That potential is what resurrected the franchise and is what should be applauded. Of all the slashers that carved up the 80s, it’s rather surprising and delightful that Chucky is the only one with a continued, unbroken narrative going strong today.

Jason was rebooted in 2009 and has been stuck in movie purgatory ever since due to labyrinthian legal issues, among other things. Time will tell if the announced Crystal Lake series from Bryan Fuller comes to fruition.

Freddy has also been stuck in dreamland since his remake in 2010 put audiences to sleep.

I don’t think I need to explain to anyone reading this just how wild the branching timeline of the Halloween franchise is.

But Chucky? Not even his remake was enough to put a stop to his primary timeline. His story is ONE story, still going strong well into 2023. In fact, the third season of his awesome TV series for USA and SYFY – simply titled “Chucky” – just premiered this week.

2023 appears to be a good year for old Chucky. A third season of TV, the 10th anniversary milestone of the film that injected new blood into his fading franchise, and the 35th anniversary of the original Child’s Play. To quote the doll himself, I guess he’s our friend ‘till the end.

Editorials

‘Leprechaun Returns’ – The Charm of the Franchise’s Legacy Sequel

Published

on

leprechaun returns

The erratic Leprechaun franchise is not known for sticking with a single concept for too long. The namesake (originally played by Warwick Davis) has gone to L.A., Las Vegas, space, and the ‘hood (not once but twice). And after an eleven-year holiday since the Davis era ended, the character received a drastic makeover in a now-unmentionable reboot. The critical failure of said film would have implied it was time to pack away the green top hat and shillelagh, and say goodbye to the nefarious imp. Instead, the Leprechaun series tried its luck again.

The general consensus for the Leprechaun films was never positive, and the darker yet blander Leprechaun: Origins certainly did not sway opinions. Just because the 2014 installment took itself seriously did not mean viewers would. After all, creator Mark Jones conceived a gruesome horror-comedy back in the early nineties, and that format is what was expected of any future ventures. So as horror legacy sequels (“legacyquels”) became more common in the 2010s, Leprechaun Returns followed suit while also going back to what made the ‘93 film work. This eighth entry echoed Halloween (2018) by ignoring all the previous sequels as well as being a direct continuation of the original. Even ardent fans can surely understand the decision to wipe the slate clean, so to speak.

Leprechaun Returns “continued the [franchise’s] trend of not being consistent by deciding to be consistent.” The retconning of Steven Kostanski and Suzanne Keilly’s film was met with little to no pushback from the fandom, who had already become accustomed to seeing something new and different with every chapter. Only now the “new and different” was familiar. With the severe route of Origins a mere speck in the rearview mirror, director Kotanski implemented a “back to basics” approach that garnered better reception than Zach Lipovsky’s own undertaking. The one-two punch of preposterous humor and grisly horror was in full force again.

LEPRECHAUN

Pictured: Linden Porco as The Leprechaun in Leprechaun Returns.

With Warwick Davis sitting this film out — his own choice — there was the foremost challenge of finding his replacement. Returns found Davis’ successor in Linden Porco, who admirably filled those blood-stained, buckled shoes. And what would a legacy sequel be without a returning character? Jennifer Aniston obviously did not reprise her final girl role of Tory Redding. So, the film did the next best thing and fetched another of Lubdan’s past victims: Ozzie, the likable oaf played by Mark Holton. Returns also created an extension of Tory’s character by giving her a teenage daughter, Lila (Taylor Spreitler).

It has been twenty-five years since the events of the ‘93 film. The incident is unknown to all but its survivors. Interested in her late mother’s history there in Devil’s Lake, North Dakota, Lila transferred to the local university and pledged a sorority — really the only one on campus — whose few members now reside in Tory Redding’s old home. The farmhouse-turned-sorority-house is still a work in progress; Lila’s fellow Alpha Epsilon sisters were in the midst of renovating the place when a ghost of the past found its way into the present.

The Psycho Goreman and The Void director’s penchant for visceral special effects is noted early on as the Leprechaun tears not only into the modern age, but also through poor Ozzie’s abdomen. The portal from 1993 to 2018 is soaked with blood and guts as the Leprechaun forces his way into the story. Davis’ iconic depiction of the wee antagonist is missed, however, Linden Porco is not simply keeping the seat warm in case his predecessor ever resumes the part. His enthusiastic performance is accentuated by a rotten-looking mug that adds to his innate menace.

LEPRECHAUN RETURNS sequel

Pictured: Taylor Spreitler, Pepi Sonuga, and Sai Bennett as Lila, Katie and Rose in Leprechaun Returns.

The obligatory fodder is mostly young this time around. Apart from one luckless postman and Ozzie — the premature passing of the latter character removed the chance of caring about anyone in the film — the Leprechaun’s potential prey are all college aged. Lila is this story’s token trauma kid with caregiver baggage; her mother thought “monsters were always trying to get her.” Lila’s habit of mentioning Tory’s mental health problem does not make a good first impression with the resident mean girl and apparent alcoholic of the sorority, Meredith (Emily Reid). Then there are the nicer but no less cursorily written of the Alpha Epsilon gals: eco-conscious and ex-obsessive Katie (Pepi Sonuga), and uptight overachiever Rose (Sai Bennett). Rounding out the main cast are a pair of destined-to-die bros (Oliver Llewellyn Jenkins, Ben McGregor). Lila and her peers range from disposable to plain irritating, so rooting for any one of them is next to impossible. Even so, their overstated personalities make their inevitable fates more satisfying.

Where Returns excels is its death sequences. Unlike Jones’ film, this one is not afraid of killing off members of the main cast. Lila, admittedly, wears too much plot armor, yet with her mother’s spirit looming over her and the whole story — comedian Heather McDonald put her bang-on Aniston impersonation to good use as well as provided a surprisingly emotional moment in the film — her immunity can be overlooked. Still, the other characters’ brutal demises make up for Lila’s imperviousness. The Leprechaun’s killer set-pieces also happen to demonstrate the time period, seeing as he uses solar panels and a drone in several supporting characters’ executions. A premortem selfie and the antagonist’s snarky mention of global warming additionally add to this film’s particular timestamp.

Critics were quick to say Leprechaun Returns did not break new ground. Sure, there is no one jetting off to space, or the wacky notion of Lubdan becoming a record producer. This reset, however, is still quite charming and entertaining despite its lack of risk-taking. And with yet another reboot in the works, who knows where the most wicked Leprechaun ever to exist will end up next.


Horror contemplates in great detail how young people handle inordinate situations and all of life’s unexpected challenges. While the genre forces characters of every age to face their fears, it is especially interested in how youths might fare in life-or-death scenarios.

The column Young Blood is dedicated to horror stories for and about teenagers, as well as other young folks on the brink of terror.

Leprechaun Returns movie

Pictured: Linden Porco as The Leprechaun in Leprechaun Returns.

Continue Reading