Connect with us

Editorials

Inside the Head of Pamela Voorhees [Part 1]!!

Published

on

Broadcast Thought is the collective name for a creative cabal of three forensic psychiatrists (H. Eric Bender, M.D., Praveen R. Kambam, M.D., and Vasilis K. Pozios, M.D.) who also happen to have a vast and unquenchable thirst for pop culture knowledge.

I recently co-moderated a panel with them at Wondercon called “Flashback to the Slash Pack.” There, along with Freddy vs. Jason and Friday The 13th (2009) writer Mark Swift, we took a look at the psychological underpinnings of characters like Michael Myers, Freddy Krueger and Jason Voorhees. But these guys go even deeper than that. Like I said, their interest is limitless and there is no figure in horror (or any other genre, for that matter) that is beyond reproach

Today we launch the first article in our two-part assessment of the mother of one of the most famous slashers out there, Jason Voorhees. And as a slasher herself, she’s no slouch. That’s right, Pamela Voorhees. While Mrs. Voorhees was played by Paula Shaw in Freddy vs. Jason and Nana Visitor in the 2009 reboot, their research here stems solely from Betsy Palmer’s iconic 1980 portrayal of the character in the original Friday The 13th.

Be sure to follow BTdocs on Twitter and head below to go Inside The Head Of Pamela Voorhees!!

Mrs_Voorhees_Broadcast_Thought_5_5_14

DISCLAIMER 1: In real life, we would need an adequate evaluation:

Various diagnoses might help explain Pamela Voorhees’ mental state as seen in Friday the 13th (1980), but to truly understand her struggles, we would need to conduct a psychiatric evaluation and gather necessary information to properly diagnose anything.  It might be tough to interview her given that she’s been decapitated.

DISCLAIMER 2: There is an overblown link between mental illness and violence:

While we can try to offer hypothetical explanations for Mrs. Voorhees’ behaviors, clinical mental illness, in and of itself, doesn’t typically increase one’s risk for violence except in a few narrow circumstances (e.g., alcohol and drug use disorders, acute paranoia).

What’s up with Mrs. Voorhees’ bizarre behaviors?

Dr. Bender: In Friday the 13th (1980), we see Mrs. Voorhees blaming camp personnel for perceived wrongs, sometimes having a conversation with herself using two different voices, becoming rageful, and of course, killing.  From the limited information available, Mrs. V seemed to be displaying symptoms of dissociation (a state of detachment from oneself or surroundings) and/or psychosis (a loss of touch with reality).  Examples of people in dissociative states can include a person under hypnosis, a person intoxicated with drugs like ketamine, a Vietnam veteran experiencing a “flashback” and believing he is back in a combat situation, and someone with Dissociative Identity Disorder (formerly called Multiple Personality Disorder).  Examples of psychotic symptoms include experiencing hallucinations or believing bizarre things that are not really true, e.g., shape-shifting aliens have replaced my family members.

Dr Kambam: There is some evidence to suggest that Mrs. Voorhees is psychotic.  First, she appeared to be talking to herself as if she were experiencing command auditory hallucinations (hearing a voice she believed to be Jason ordering her to do things).  She might have been hearing and responding to a false perception of Jason’s voice.  For example, when Mrs. V and Alice meet, Mrs. V said aloud, “Help, Mommy!” and then responded by saying, “I am, Jason.”  Mrs. V then said to herself in a childish voice, “Kill her, Mommy!  Kill her!  Don’t let her get away, Mommy!  Don’t let her live!”  Mrs. V answered herself and stated, “I won’t, Jason!  I won’t!”  She repeatedly said, “Kill her!” in that childish voice, “Kill her, Mommy!  Kill her!  She can’t hide…No place to hide…Kill her!…Kill her!…Kill her!…Kill her!…”

Dr. Pozios: Mrs. V’s statements may indicate she held a delusion (fixed, false belief) that Alice (and other camp personnel) actually let Jason die.  When Mrs. V and Alice meet, Mrs. V did appear to have thoughts of Jason drowning.  She told Alice, “You let him drown!  You never paid any attention!  Look what you did to him…”  If these were, in fact, delusional thoughts, it’s possible that the counselors weren’t even having sex the day of Jason’s death – Mrs. V might just have falsely believed that.  

Dr. Kambam: When considering whether Mrs. V actually has a psychotic illness, it is important to consider her age.  Given that Jason died at age eleven, Mrs. V was likely in her late 20s or 30s at that time.  She would have been at a typical age for a woman to develop Schizophrenia (a psychotic disorder).  

Dr. Pozios: Despite the above information suggesting that she had some psychotic behavior, other evidence suggests that she was not psychotic.  First, it is atypical for someone genuinely experiencing auditory hallucinations to parrot or speak the auditory hallucination.  That is, Mrs. V responding to Jason’s voice may be consistent with experiencing auditory hallucinations but her speaking in his voice is unusual.  Second, assuming that the counselors truly were negligent of their duties when Jason died, Mrs. V might not have been delusional in thinking that Alice actually let Jason die.  Instead, Mrs. V might have been communicating her anger and displacing that emotion onto anyone that was related to the camp (much like someone angry with the police after experiencing a perceived wrong from one or two police officers).  Finally, experiencing the symptoms in question in an episodic fashion is atypical for a primary psychotic disorder compared to dissociative episodes.

Dr. Bender: Some evidence suggests that Mrs. V was actively dissociating – experiencing a separation from her surroundings and/or her physical and emotional experience.  In fact, Mrs. V appeared to experience (at least) two personality states/identities as evidenced by her conversations with herself.  She also appeared to act as if she were reliving or flashing back to the traumatic event (Jason’s drowning).  Her actions might reflect symptoms of possible disorders in which someone can experience dissociative symptoms.

Dr. Pozios: First, she might have some form of Dissociative Identity Disorder (formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder).  Could it be that the trauma of losing Jason was so devastating that she had a “split” in her personality and now has at least one other “alter” personality?  At times there seemed to be two or more distinct personality states – an avenging, enforcer personality and a more childlike-sounding personality.  There may have been a third “alter,” which could explain Mrs. V’s periods of relative wellness and not killing.

Broadcast_Thought_5_5_14

Dr. Kambam: But some things may not fit Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID).  We don’t have evidence for the other criteria of DID.  Also, while it isn’t absolute, many with this disorder have a history of experiencing abuse – it is unclear from the movie alone whether Mrs. V had such a history.

Dr. Pozios: It’s also possible that Mrs. V had Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).  She experienced the traumatic event of her son dying.  She re-experienced the event by possibly experiencing flashbacks of Jason dying when talking to Alice.  She displayed problems with anger and irritability (which may be indications of hyperarousal symptoms).

Dr. Bender: But the problem with trying to apply a PTSD diagnosis is that Mrs. V didn’t display a hallmark feature: avoidance.  Instead of avoiding reminders of the trauma, she actively sought them out by returning to the camp, the counselors, and the setting of the traumatic event.  Also, hyperarousal symptoms of anger and irritability that can be part of PTSD have to be a change from baseline – we don’t know if these existed for Mrs. V before the events of the movie.

Dr. Kambam: It’s also possible her behaviors and dissociative episodes might reflect Borderline Personality Disorder.  People with this disorder can experience dissociative episodes, especially when stressed, frantic, and feeling like they aren’t in control of a particular situation.  (Borderline Personality Disorder was originally named for the borderline the patient walks between being neurotic, or distressed, and psychotic.)  Mrs. V’s rapid, unpredictable mood shifts might have been affective instability of this personality disorder, while her murderous rampage might have reflected the inappropriate, intense anger or difficulty controlling anger that someone with Borderline Personality Disorder can have.  At the same time, blaming the counselors could have been a transient, stress-related paranoia.

Dr. Pozios: However, with Borderline Personality Disorder, the dissociation seen in Borderline Personality Disorder is often that of depersonalization (experiencing the sense/feeling that you’re observing yourself from outside your body with controlling it) or derealization (experiencing the sense/feeling that you’re surroundings aren’t real), rather than experiencing multiple personalities.  So that doesn’t exactly fit.  Also, people with Borderline Personality Disorder are much more likely to engage in self-injurious behavior rather than violence toward other (despite what we saw in Fatal Attraction).

Dr. Bender: What’s more, personality disorders are chronic and pervasive – from the first movie, we don’t know if Mrs. V had problems across the board throughout her life.  In addition, Mrs. V didn’t meet enough criteria to be diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder (she might have met three of criteria but five is required for the diagnosis).

 If she has dissociation or psychosis, why isn’t she always killing or acting in a bizarre manner?

Dr. Pozios: If Mrs. V were experiencing dissociation, we could expect a worsening during periods of particular stress and/or reminders of trauma.  The potential re-opening of Camp Crystal Lake might have been too much for her to handle.  In a primary psychotic disorder like Schizophrenia, symptoms of psychosis would be relatively constant.  However, this diagnosis would be inconsistent with an almost 20-year period in which she didn’t have any erratic, bizarre behaviors (or so we assume).  At the same time, it may be that she had treatment during this time and that treatment controlled her symptoms.

Dr. Bender: While primary psychotic disorders like Schizophrenia have natural ebbs and flows in symptom severity, episodic psychotic symptoms are more typically seen when they are secondary to another illness that is episodic.  One such illness is Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features.  Here, only during severe episodes of depression does one experience psychotic symptoms.  In Mrs. V’s case, the death of Jason might have been such a significant stressor that it triggered grief then led to a Major Depressive Disorder in her.  It is also possible that Mrs. V had periods of improvement (perhaps with treatment) and worsening.  Perhaps the times when she got worse were in 1962, when she presumably poisoned the water at the camp, and in 1980, when she went on a killing rampage.

That’s it for this week! Tune in next week to find out if Pamela Voorhees was indeed a serial killer. Or if she was in fact insane…

giphy

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading