Connect with us

Editorials

Horror Education of the Week: ‘Prometheus’

Published

on

Prometheus.

Some of you liked it. The majority of you hated it.

I adore it.

The prequel/not a prequel to Alien (and now maybe it’s a sequel to Blade Runner) follows Dr. Elizabeth Shaw and Dr. Charlie Holloway, along with a crew, to LV-223. After finding multiple drawings across Earth, all depicting the same god-like figure, they set out on their journey to this distant planet. There they hope to find the answers to mankind.

Perhaps Prometheus can be seen as a warning to our society to not put our trust in man as a god. It can also be seen as a warning to not put all of our faith in an invisible God.


Prometheus blows my mind. There are so many complex themes and imagery in it that makes me want to watch it on repeat. I cannot do it justice. There is simply no possible way. I state this with every article where I present ideas to you, but this time I truly mean it. To give every ounce I believe this film deserves would take weeks if not months.

I think Prometheus affects me strongly because I grew up Catholic. I learned the Bible in a manner where I was told that I was special – because I was one of the few that believed in THE ONE TRUE GOD. In the last few years, any ounce of belief has left me. I still hope that there is some purpose to life or a higher being that put all of this into existence, but I simply can no longer put my faith into something I cannot see.

While I cannot give Prometheus the analysis it deserves, I can present the greatest, most obvious theme throughout this incredible film. The concept of God.

From the beginning, Prometheus is saturated with religion.

– The opening of Prometheus opens with a god-like engineer sacrificing himself. As his body deteriorates, it is washed away and DNA broken down. DNA we later discover is identical to human DNA.

– He has sacrificed himself, like Jesus, so that we shall live.

– The name Elizabeth is the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name Elisheva, meaning “God’s promise”, “oath of God”, or “I am God’s daughter”.

– Elizabeth is always wearing her father’s cross, showing she has faith in God.

– The name Charles is from the Germanic word karl meaning “free man”.

– Charlie’s faith is in science, much like Charles Darwin.

– When Prometheus lands, the captain is seen setting up a Christmas tree. The celebration of the birth of the Son of God.

– There is constant dialogue throughout the movie on what the characters believe, and what they have faith in.

– Elizabeth’s mission is to find the creators. Her thoughts are that the engineers created us, and she wants to know who created them.

– In the pyramid, the crew find the chamber full of the vases of death. This scene is very reminiscent of the egg chamber in Aliens, as mentioned a few weeks ago.

– Behind the giant head in the chamber, is a mural. The mural shows a familiar alien being in a very crucified Christ pose. Yes, it’s our Space Jesus.

– When Charlie and Elizabeth argue about the discovery of the fallen engineers, Charlie states that the realization is that nothing is special. Anyone can create life.

– We then learn that Elizabeth is sterile and cannot conceive. This idea is very important.

– In the Gospel of Luke, Mary, the mother of Jesus, asks how she is to conceive and bear a son, since she is a virgin. She is told it will happen by the power of God.

– After Charlie is infected and is killed, Elizabeth is told by David that she is pregnant. A virgin birth of sorts by the power of the engineer gods.

– Wrapped much like Christ on the cross, Elizabeth preforms surgery to remove the alien embryo from her.

“Sometimes to create, one must destroy.”

– This quote can be seen everywhere in the Bible, perhaps the most prominent in the Old Testament with the story Noah and his ark. God sends constant rain upon the earth to flood and destroy it so that select humans can start over.

– In the Bible, King David is chosen by God.

– David in the film is stated by Peter Weyland to be his only son. Much like Jesus to God.

– A parallel of the Bible story of David and Goliath can be seen in Prometheus.

– Goliath was a giant and a warrior. David struck Goliath in the forehead with a stone from his sling. Goliath fell dead, and David took Goliath’s sword and beheaded him.

– The Bible story’s point was to show that Goliath represented paganism, and David represented a true faith in God.

– The engineer can be seen as the Goliath figure in Prometheus, however, with the stones of words that David throws, he is far from victorious and ends up being the one beheaded.

– In the Bible, Jesus asks his disciples, “Who do you say that I am?” Simon answers, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”

– Jesus says that Simon is “blessed” to see his true identity. Jesus then calls Simon by the name “Peter” – from the word ‘rock’ in Greek.

– “On this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hell will not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:13-20)

– The idea that Peter Weyland hopes to learn the secret to eternal life on LV-223 – a giant rock – can be interpreted in a much deeper sense from the above quote.

– The first scene we see the awakened Peter Weyland, he is having his feet washed.

– At the beginning of the Last Supper, Jesus washed his disciples’ feet. Peter refused to let Jesus wash his feet to which Jesus said: “If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me”, Peter replied: “Lord, not my feet only, but also my hands and my head”. (John 13:2-11)

– The idea that Weyland’s feet are being washed just before his “last supper” so to speak, is quite significant.

– Weyland’s last words are: “There’s nothing.”

– David answers, “I know. Have a good journey, Mr. Weyland.”

– In the deleted scenes and extras in the dvd set of Prometheus, we see additional amounts of religious imagery.

– At the 2023 TED Conference, Peter Weyland gives a grand speech culminating in “We are the gods now.”

– In an extended conversation with the engineer at the end of the film, Weyland tells him that he made David in his own image. For that, he deserves to live forever as he, too, is a god.

– In a transmission to Weyland, Elizabeth pleas for his assistance, stating “Do you ever feel all the science in the world will never give us the answers we really want?”

– In the end, Elizabeth puts her father’s cross back on as David asks her, “After all this, you still believe, don’t you?”

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading