Quantcast
Connect with us

Movies

[Review] ‘mother!’ is a Bold, Fascinating, and Divisive Experience!

Published

on

Prepare yourself for a myriad of think pieces because Darren Aronofsky’s mother! (please note the lower case and the exclamation mark) is upon us. If you have seen the trailer, the clips or the reviews, you may think that you have a sense of what the film is about, but as with most Aronofsky films, this is one best experienced for yourself. I will say that the word on the street in Toronto is single minded: this is a very divisive film. It is not for everyone…and that’s probably why folks should check it out.

Let’s backtrack: mother! tells the story of a married couple living in a secluded home in the middle of a clearing in the woods. Mother (Jennifer Lawrence) has been renovating the house while Him (Javier Bardem), a renown poet, works to overcome his writer’s block. One day Man (Ed Harris) knocks on the door and, after learning the identity of Him, Man ingratiates himself into spending the night in the guest room. The next morning Man’s wife, Woman (Michelle Pfeiffer) arrives and, in due course, their sons Younger and Older (real life brothers, Brian and Domhnall Gleeson) do, too. And they refuse to leave. And others continue to arrive.

Aronofsky spins a dizzying web with both his screenplay and his direction. Mother is without a doubt the film’s protagonist, so the film’s insanity is all presented from her point of view. As a result, she becomes the mouthpiece for all of the audiences’ reactions, which frequently amounts to “WTF is going on?!” Literally every other character in the film – none of whom have proper names – refuses to act like a sane, normal person, including Him, who indulges the whims and flattery of the strangers without question or discussion with his much younger wife. This regularly leaves Mother in a subservient, reactionary position; she answers the door, prepares food, cleans up messes, and roams the halls of the gorgeous home after and in search of others.

[Related] All TIFF 2017 News and Reviews!

To say that things only get weirder with the appearance of each subsequent new person is an understatement of enormous proportion. mother! reminded me of the counter-cinema filmmaking style of Jean-Luc Goddard, who regularly introduced the most bizarre events in his films to shock, confuse and break down the fourth wall in order to remind his audience that they are watching a film. mother! reminded me of one of Goddard’s most infamous sequences: a single take dolly of a traffic jam that includes horrific violence.

While removing the audience from the film is not exactly Aronofsky’s intention, the film is without a doubt a self-reflexive meditation of the role of the artist as creator, inspiration and muse and the ritualistic worship of celebrity above reason and sanity. There’s an inherent circularity in mother! that speaks to the creative process and it’s baked into the production not only at the narrative level (the film opens with a fiery rebirth), but also Aronofsky’s staging of the action, which finds Mother running in endless circles around the house amidst the action. It’s also difficult not to read into Lawrence’s casting (she’s Aronofsky’s girlfriend and current muse) in the way that he keeps his camera trained on her face throughout the film; in this way her every panicked reaction and injury is a canvas which reflects the escalating Bacchanal chaos and violence occurring within the house’s walls.

The two-hour runtime will challenge mainstream cinemagoers, as well the virtually non-stop frenzied nature of the action. Aronofsky rightfully breaks the worst of it into two separate extended sequences – one involving Harris, Pfeiffer and their family conflict; the other six months later just as the dust has settled. Both, but especially the latter, will test patrons’ capacity for chaos and confusion, especially if they are not fully on board with the madness that Aronofsky is selling. It should be noted that mother! isn’t particularly scary, though sound is frequently used to great effect to create a sense of unease. This complements Aronofsky’s shaky handheld shooting approach and closer framing to keep the audience unaware of what is happening until Mother stumbles upon it throughout the film.

mother! is unequivocally not a film for everyone and it will be incredibly divisive when it is released on Sept 15. I fully expect that it will wind up on many end of year lists in both the Best and Worst categories. Personally, I found it a bold, fascinating, and slightly pretentious film, which places it well ahead of safe, but bland films. I firmly believe that while many will be turned away by the nature of reviews and word of mouth, this is absolutely a film that audiences should see and experience for themselves. For this reason, I strongly recommend mother!

Joe is a TV addict with a background in Film Studies. He co-created TV/Film Fest blog QueerHorrorMovies and writes for Bloody Disgusting, Anatomy of a Scream, That Shelf, The Spool and Grim Magazine. He enjoys graphic novels, dark beer and plays multiple sports (adequately, never exceptionally). While he loves all horror, if given a choice, Joe always opts for slashers and creature features.

69 Comments

Editorials

Meet the Actors Who Brought the ‘Backrooms’ Still Life Monsters to Life [SPOILERS]

Published

on

Renate Reinsve in 'Backrooms' - Horror ARGs

Judging from the unprecedented box office success of Kane Parsons’ Backrooms adaptation, you’ve likely already seen the liminal horror hit that managed to make audiences afraid of empty hallways and bad wallpaper. And now that so many of us have already entered the yellow labyrinth (some of us more than once), the time has come to discuss the spoiler-filled details that make the movie so fascinating in the first place.

And if there’s one element here that makes the Backrooms movie stand out from any previous lore/mythology, it has to be the genius addition of the Still Life entities. Warped recreations of real people that somehow wandered into the Complex, these misremembered creatures are responsible for some of the most disturbing imagery of 2026 – as well as laugh-out-loud memes created by one of the film’s very own concept artists.

However, true to Parsons’ word that the movie would rely heavily on practical effects, each of these distorted monsters was brought to life by real actors under heavy layers of makeup and prosthetics (with the occasional splash of CGI enhancements). While Anora and If I Had Legs I’d Kick You actress Ivy Wolk wasn’t among these performers, despite what Letterboxd might have you believe, the creature cast did benefit from veteran players with plenty of genre experience.

For starters, Alien: Romulus alumni Robert Bobroczkyi (who previously brought that film’s horrific Offspring to life during its most memorable sequence) plays the flick’s main antagonist, the Still Life version of Captain Clark. And though there was some obvious CGI involved in making the character’s peg-leg and nightmarish face more believable, Bobroczkyi’s monstrous performance and his natural 7’7″ frame helped to make that final chase sequence a clear highlight among this year’s genre offerings.

The film’s Texas-Chain-Saw-inspired “dinner” scene also features a freaky collection of less-aggressive Still Life creatures in the form of the Bearded Man, the Red-Headed Woman and, strangest of them all, the cheekily named “Archibald Leland Sutter Still Life” (who earned this title among fans and crewmembers as a reference to his apparent affinity for lamps).

While this was the first major horror outing for both Patrick Baynham (The Bearded Man) and Dana Mahmood (Archibald), Rhiannon Roberts has worked as a stunt performer in everything from Yellowjackets to HBO’s The Last of Us adaptation – which is probably why The Red-Headed Woman is the most active out of Clark’s impromptu “family.” That being said, the Archibald Leland Sutter Still Life is my personal favorite of the bunch simply because his anachronistic outfit suggests that the Backrooms phenomenon might be a lot older than the Async Foundation. I also love how hard he tries to be helpful with that little light of his!

That might be it for the Still Life entities, but I think horror fans will also be pleased to hear that the film’s Found Footage prologue stars none other than Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City star Avan Jogia as Naren Warne – and American Mary herself Katharine Isabelle also shows up in a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it cameo at Mary’s house party towards the middle of the story (though I have a feeling that she originally had a bigger part that was likely cut for time).

At the end of the day, Parsons’ Backrooms may have been an auteur-driven project motivated by the young director’s unique take on the classic creepypasta, but film has always been a collective artform, so it’s fun to see just how many talented performers it takes to bring this kind of supernatural nightmare to life in a way that connects with so many people.

Continue Reading