Movies
[SXSW Review] ‘Upgrade’ Is a Lot of Goofy Fun
There’s a scene in Upgrade in which Logan Marshall-Green exhibits some straight-up masterful physical comedy. Can we get this guy – the mournful-eyed star of The Invitation – in some slapstick comedies, please?
Despite a few scenes that had our audience cracking up and applauding, Upgrade is hard to pin down tonally. Leigh Whannell’s near-futuristic sci-fi flick is sometimes a tech thriller, sometimes a revenge actioner, sometimes a tragic film about loss. But it works best when it’s allowed to be a goofy blast, when Marshall-Green is allowed to have more fun than we’re used to seeing from him.
He plays Grey Trace, an old-fashioned mechanic in a new-fashioned world. Everything around Grey is automated – cars and homes and earbuds are all “smart” and streamlined. Grey doesn’t trust this pretty, sterile new world in which everything operates without the possibility of human error. Grey likes to work with his hands.
So, naturally, he’s paralyzed in a seemingly random mugging. Fortunately, he’s also on the radar of a billionaire tech wunderkind (Harrison Gilbertson) named Eron, whose car Grey once repaired. Eron offers a bitter Grey a way out from his wheelchair-bound prison, a way back to the hands-on man he used to be. Eron’s Vessel Industries has created a brand new piece of remarkable technology, a tiny apparatus that Eron calls “Stem” and Grey hilariously refers to as “a widget” for the duration of the film, the way your grandpa might call your laptop “that contraption.” Stem attaches itself to a person’s mental synapses and takes over the bodily functions. Grey merely has to think, “walk,” “run,” “grab that cup of coffee and drink it,” and Stem makes it so.
But, of course, it turns out that there’s more to Grey’s new upgrade than mobility. Stem speaks to him, a tiny voice in his ear giving him invaluable information and helping him solve the mystery of the men who paralyzed him. Get Out’s Betty Gabriel plays the detective assigned to Grey’s case, earnest and dedicated, but she doesn’t have the special advantages Stem brings to the table. Stem offers Grey enhanced senses and lightning-fast cognitive function – and reflexes.
That’s where the slapstick comedy comes in, as Grey allows Stem to take over when he’s in the middle of a physical altercation with one of the thugs responsible for his mugging. Suddenly he’s predicting every punch, dodging every swing, kicking and jumping like a damn “ninja,” as Grey describes himself. But meanwhile, Marshall-Green’s face looks utterly baffled, in complete disbelief of these miraculous things he’s doing. The resulting scene is both breathtakingly violent and totally hilarious.
It’s the best moment in Upgrade, and if the film were more comfortable framing itself as a sci-fi action comedy in total, it would be more successful. The ideas behind Upgrade are a little silly and juvenile, and when the movie wants to take itself seriously, we’re not really buying it.
But even in its most self-serious moments, Upgrade is more fun to watch than a lot of low-budget sci-fi movies we see in festival or VOD settings. It’s really visually interesting, with warm and colorful tech replacing the sterile blues and greys typical of films like this. Upgrade looks more expensive than it almost definitely is, and that’s to Whannell’s credit. He does a lot with a little and crafts a really cool look at the near future.
The opening credits are read in a robot voice; a driverless car is built like the hull of a wooden ship; an off-grid bar called Old Bones is filled with tough weirdos who have augmented their bodies with horns and head-bolts – these are the kinds of fun, goofy details that make Upgrade worth watching. It’s a good-natured film that will never bore you, but don’t enter into it thinking you’re about to find a thoughtful, mature treatise on the dangers of over-reliance on technology. Upgrade is not that movie – even though it might think it is.
Movies
‘Backrooms’ Director Kane Parsons Is No Fan of Generative AI: “Defeats the Purpose Entirely for Me”
There has been a lot of talk recently about filmmakers embracing generative AI as part of the filmmaking process, from Darren Aronofsky to Martin Scorsese. But what about filmmakers that are against the use of Gen AI for creative pursuits? You can count 20-year-old Backrooms director Kane Parsons among that group, which should give you some hope for the future.
In a new chat with The Australian, the self-taught young filmmaker makes it crystal clear that he won’t be using generative AI in any of his upcoming filmmaking projects.
“I think I’m in the same boat as most well-adjusted people,” Parsons tells the outlet. “If I could snap my fingers and make generative AI disappear forever, I probably would. Creatively, I get no enjoyment from using those tools. It defeats the purpose entirely for me.”
“What interests me more is interrogating it artistically,” Parsons notes. “We already live in a world where you walk outside and there are billboards and signs that are obvious AI slop. That’s become part of our visual reality. To me, generative AI feels less like innovation than a symptom of a broader cultural and economic rot.”
He explains, “I’m interested in using that iconography in art – not using AI to make the art itself, but examining what it represents. I definitely want to explore it further in future projects.”
Kane Parsons also notes during the interview with The Australian, “… there’s so much at stake and so many genuinely harmful consequences already happening.”
Backrooms marks young prodigy Kane Parsons’ feature directorial debut, and it’s based on his own series of YouTube videos that were brought to life using Blender, the open-source 3D computer graphics software suite. So it’s no surprise that Parsons, who has hand-made his filmmaking career up to this point, isn’t buying into the hoopla around Generative AI.
His debut feature is the #1 movie in the world, so perhaps he’s onto something.
What’s next from Kane Parsons, you ask? Stay tuned…


You must be logged in to post a comment.