Connect with us

Editorials

‘My Super Psycho Sweet 16’ – MTV’s Attempt at a Slasher Franchise

Published

on

My Super Psycho Sweet 16

It’s easy to forget just how revolutionary MTV was back when it first went on the air, with the channel quickly becoming a staple of youth culture during the 80s and 90s. Of course, interests change over time, and the music-focused giant was eventually forced to make a few concessions in order to compete with rival channels. This led to MTV investing heavily in reality programming during the 2000s, which many claim to be the beginning of the end when it comes to their original brand.

One of these reality shows happened to be 2005’s My Super Sweet 16, which dove into the drama-filled world of extravagant teenage birthday parties. While I was only tangentially aware of the show back in the day, it was actually a massive hit and even garnered its own feature film spin-off in 2007. However, this peculiar little program would also become the basis for MTV’s My Super Psycho Sweet 16, a bizarre slasher franchise satirizing the original show’s petty conflicts and themes.

It’s now been a decade since the premiere of the third and final entry in the series, and while these made-for-TV flicks didn’t exactly have a lasting impact (especially since they’ve become rather hard to acquire), I’d like to take this opportunity to look back on MTV’s first attempt at their very own horror franchise.

Strangely enough, it was the network itself that originally approached director Jacob Gentry with their idea for a horror-centric adaptation of their popular show. The director had already been featured on MTV in the past, with the channel airing his Terminator 3 fan film when he was just fifteen years old, but he also had experience in the horror genre after co-directing 2007’s underrated The Signal. The only problem was that Gentry was clearly not a fan of reality TV, openly admitting that he considered it one of the lowest forms of entertainment.

My Super Psycho Sweet 16 mtv

What’s scarier than teen drama?

In a bizarre turn of events, this actually worked out for the best, as the director ended up realizing that the absurd situations and characters depicted in the show were already the perfect setup for a traditional slasher flick. Partnering with writers Scott Thomas and Jed Elinoff, Gentry soon had a weirdly entertaining mish-mash of teen drama and horror tropes on his hands, which could appeal to both fans of the original property and horror junkies alike.

Airing during the Halloween season of 2009 after a promotional theatrical release, My Super Psycho Sweet 16 stars Lauren McKnight as Skye Rotter, a teenage outcast whose father was responsible for a horrific mass murder at the local roller-skating rink. Unfortunately, the spoiled high-schooler Madison Penrose (Julianna Guill) insists on having her sixteenth birthday party at that very same Roller Dome, eventually leading to the unexpected return of Skye’s murderous dad during an unforgettable Sweet 16.

An uncomplicated teen horror flick, My Super Psycho Sweet 16 doesn’t reinvent the slasher wheel, but it doesn’t really have to. The birthday setting and appropriately dramatic teenage characters are interesting enough, with McKnight standing out as a memorable final girl and Guill turning in a respectable performance as a spoiled brat. The “Lord of the Rink” killer is also pretty cool, sporting a medieval motif as he takes down partygoers with swords and axes. I’d argue that the only real flaw here is the overall lack of brutality, as even the unrated version feels a bit tame.

Either way, the movie was a big hit for MTV, receiving mostly positive reviews and impressive ratings. That’s why it’s no surprise that a sequel was greenlit almost immediately, with Gentry and his team coming back for more the following year. Featuring a larger budget and more ambitious kills, the follow-up was bigger and meaner than the original without losing any of the teen soap-opera charm.

My Super Psycho Sweet 16 slasher

Family is forever. Wait, wrong slasher movie…

Once again starring McKnight as Skye Rotter, the sequel sees our traumatized protagonist move in with her estranged mother after fleeing the scene at the end of the first film. While it initially appears that Skye has earned a fresh start, her inevitable 16th birthday party ends up attracting unwanted attention, with old friends and psychotic enemies returning for yet another Sweet 16 murder spree.

Airing in October of 2010, My Super Psycho Sweet 16: Part 2 is a surprisingly solid follow-up to an already entertaining movie. It still feels like 90210 meets I Know What You Did Last Summer, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Skye remains a memorably edgy protagonist and her teenage worries are compelling enough to make you not root for the killer, who remains appropriately threatening (though a little less over-the-top with his medieval antics).

This one was another hit for MTV, but judging by what happened to the third film, it’s likely that it wasn’t quite as popular as the original. The network still ended up commissioning another sequel, but the film suffered a few delays and it appears that budgets got slashed somewhere along the way. This resulted in a final entry that doesn’t quite live up to the standard of its predecessors.

In 2012’s My Super Psycho Sweet 16: Part 3, Skye is invited to her estranged half-sister’s 16th birthday party before heading off to college. Things obviously don’t go according to plan, as it appears that the birthday curse lives on. With bodies beginning to pile, Skye once again has to face off against old enemies during yet another blood-soaked celebration.

My Super Psycho Sweet 16 horror

‘Lord of the Rink’ is one of the all-time best Slasher villain names.

Part 3 is still somewhat entertaining in its own right, but it lacks some of the charm present in previous entries. This is mostly due to the less-intimidating killer and the isolated country house setting, which is arguably the least interesting of the bunch. It also doesn’t help that the titular Sweet 16 is attended by a mere handful of characters, limiting the thrills in both quantity and quality. It may bring a satisfying conclusion to Skye’s story, but I often skip this one when re-watching the franchise.

These made-for-TV movies obviously aren’t for everyone, as the schlocky writing and teenage sensibilities may get on some viewers’ nerves, but I see this trilogy as a fun prototype for future teen-oriented horror shows like Scream and American Horror Story. While I think you’d probably get more out of the experience if you were a teenager yourself when you first watched the trilogy, there’s still a lot to love about these cheesy birthday massacres.

The peculiar mix of soap-opera styled drama and classic horror tropes makes My Super Psycho Sweet 16 surprisingly memorable, and I particularly enjoy how McKnight’s protagonist becomes more complex as the films go on. The MTV-approved soundtracks also serve as a musical time capsule of the late-2000s to early-2010s that’s sure to entertain the more nostalgic horror hounds out there.

Before the horror renaissance of the mid-2010s, TV horrors were few and far in between. That’s why I believe the My Super Psycho Sweet 16 trilogy stands out as a fun introduction to the horror genre for an audience that might never have seen a Slasher flick before. These movies may have suffered from watered-down kills and budgetary constraints due to their made-for-TV origins, but I think they’re still worth revisiting for their soap opera thrills and festive kills. At the very least, I’d say that they’re a hell of a lot more fun than the original My Super Sweet 16 show.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading