Editorials
Time to Revisit… ‘Joshua’
The latest in my series taking a look at under-appreciated genre films puts the spotlight on George Ratliff’s evil-child flick Joshua, a 2007 indie that was unceremoniously dumped into 150 theaters by Fox Searchlight before quietly hitting the DVD market. As opposed to 2009’s similar Orphan, which enjoyed an illustrious wide release and considerable marketing push from Warner Bros., Joshua has been unjustly relegated to “also-ran” status despite the fact that it’s every bit as effective as its bigger-budgeted counterpart.
Take a trip with me now as I compare and contrast the two killer-tyke flicks (both starring Vera Farmiga!) and make a case for Joshua as a more than worthy entry in the enduring “bad seed” sub-genre that deserves a revisit.
Beloved Favorite: Orphan (2009)
Number of votes on IMDB: 32,949
The Plot: The 9-year-old adopted daughter of a suburban couple who recently lost a baby begins exhibiting sociopathic behavior.
Why it’s so celebrated: Ok, perhaps “celebrated” isn’t exactly the right adjective for Orphan (it’s a bit too early to make that pronouncement for a film that’s less than two years old), but it’s certainly well-liked by many horror fans and managed to rack up a decent $42 million at the domestic box-office and another $13 million or so in DVD sales. While it doesn’t hurt that the film was heavily-hyped by Warner Bros., it’s nevertheless a very good “evil child” flick, slickly executed by House of Wax director Jaume Collet-Serra and well-acted by leads Vera Farmiga, Peter Sarsgaard and newcomer Isabelle Fuhrman as the sadistic Esther. It’s also admired by hardcore horror buffs for not holding back on the violence, featuring as it does a couple of pretty nifty kills.
Why it’s time to back-burner it for awhile: I’m actually glad that Orphan got as much attention as it did – it’s a good film that more or less fulfilled the promise that Collet-Serra had earlier shown with his House of Wax remake. But with its big-budget studio marketing push, glossy production values and release in nearly 3,000 theaters, the film already had its moment in the sun. And besides, there’s another “demon-seed” movie starring Vera Farmiga that also deserves a little attention…
Underappreciated Also-Ran: Joshua (2007)
Number of votes on IMDB: 5,614
The Plot: The 9-year-old son of a big-city couple who recently welcomed a new baby begins exhibiting sociopathic behavior.
Why it’s not so celebrated: Unlike Orphan, Joshua is imbued with an art house sensibility that doesn’t make it a natural fit for mainstream audiences. Made independently by director George Ratliff and premiering at the 2007 Sundance Film Festival, the film was picked up for a reported $4 million by Fox Searchlight, which then proceeded to dump it into 150 theaters or so before tossing it off onto DVD. While the film does have its fans and garnered generally positive reviews on release, it disappeared from theaters so quickly one could be forgiven for mistaking it as a direct-to-video title.
Why it deserves a revisiting: Joshua is a genuinely disturbing, understated gem that plays like a cerebral cousin of the more traditional Orphan (which, despite that nifty third-act twist, hits on all the standard tropes in its first 90 minutes). While the latter film essentially functions as a high-gloss rollercoaster ride, Joshua is a low-register mood piece that switches out Orphan‘s conventional histrionics for a deep sense of unease. The acting is first-rate, with newcomer Jacob Kogan giving a solid performance as the oddly-formal child prodigy with designs on his post-partum mother’s fragile state of mind. As his hapless parents, Sam Rockwell and Vera Farmiga create a devastating portrait of a well-to-do couple saddled with the taboo conundrum of feeling no real affection for their android-like son. Ratliff saturates the film with an atmosphere of almost suffocating anxiety, best exemplified in a disturbing piano recital scene that ends with Joshua’s eerily atonal rendition of childhood classic Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star. The supremely eerie final scene will stay with you for days.
Editorials
Forgotten ’80s Satanic Panic Horror Gem ‘The Kiss’ Is Worth Rediscovering
Horror was thriving so well in the 1980s that movies like Pen Densham’s The Kiss (1988) would understandably get lost in the shuffle, only to then gain their fans later on in life. Even still, this one Canadian-American curio has had a more challenging time than others, as far as contemporary reevaluations go, which is very likely due to the movie’s limited availability—at least as of this write-up.
However, the scarceness of The Kiss, while a bit annoying, makes it like catnip for ‘80s horror completists everywhere. Hopefully, a lot of them will walk away satisfied after watching this hidden gem.
Even though The Kiss was intended as the first of several horror collaborations between Astral Pictures and TriStar, as well as the first feature produced by Densham, Richard B. Lewis and John Watson’s Trilogy Entertainment Group, it ended up being the only one produced from that former union. Once the movie was released, TriStar’s distribution jitters—they opted for a regional rollout—did the $6-million flick no favors. TriStar’s cold feet toward horror releases have been well noted, but The Kiss still did a tad better than Night of the Creeps (1986), another genre outing that flopped due to its regional opening.
Shot in Montreal, but set in Albany, New York, The Kiss—which was still called The Host just a few months before its October premiere—concerns an average middle-class family and their forthcoming situation. The uncanny problem in store for them was, in fact, set in motion some years earlier. As that hot and dusty flashback to the Belgian Congo shows, a familial curse was set upon the two Dunbar sisters well before Meredith Salenger’s teenage character was born.

Meredith Salenger, Nicholas Kilbertus and Mimi Kuzyk in The Kiss
The Kiss, which was based on a story by co-writer Stephen Volk (Ghostwatch) and penned by both Volk and Tom Ropelewski, has the outward appearance of The Stepfather (1987). This movie, though, is anything but a gender-flipped retread of that classic domestic disturber. For starters, The Kiss is far less grounded in reality—that much is clear from its unsettling opening scene. There, a trusting girl (Priscilla Mouzakiotis) is the victim of her own deceptive aunt (Céline Lomez); the movie’s titular act, and the story’s first shock, becomes the means of transferring an ancient evil from one host to another.
In the present day, Salenger’s role of Amy Halloran, a religious schoolgirl, is dealt a harsh blow in life once her mother, Hilary Halloran née Dunbar (Pamela Collyer), suddenly dies in a freak accident. But rather than a complete stranger sweeping the Halloran widower (Nicholas Kilbertus) off his feet some months later, Joanna Pacula’s character is that chosen temptress. Here, Pacula plays the grown-up version of the afflicted girl last seen in the movie’s opener. Since Amy’s mother is insistent about there being no reunion between estranged sisters, and she even contemplates buying a gun shortly before her tragic demise, it’s presumable that Aunt Felice poses a threat to her family.
The Kiss isn’t a movie ever too concerned about its own predictability. The audience is indeed often one step ahead of the story here, but also keep in mind how every one of those steps is loud. Take, for instance, the death of Amy’s mother; the Halloran matriarch goes out in garish, gruesome fashion, as a supernaturally commandeered truck sends Collyer’s character through a store window first, then leaves her one leg short. The directorial enthusiasm truly comes out in horrific moments such as these.
The Kiss is always sure to revel in its characters’ ills and misfortunes. So if the plot doesn’t impress, then its lurid parts should. Amy’s mother’s exit scene was proof of an eager, first-time horror director proving his worth. Then, bestie Heather (Sabrina Boudot) survives to tell the tale of a bizarre escalator mishap that, despite showing relatively less gore, spikes viewers’ empathy meter. The wilder bits of this movie, however, commence with that inevitable hookup between Felice and Amy’s bewitched father; their kitchen coitus is paralleled by Amy’s feverish classroom terror. The outcome there is a disquieting cross-cut of sex magic and a young woman’s menstrual onset plus hallucinations.

Sabrina Boudot in The Kiss
From foam appliances to bladders, that parade of special effects in The Kiss casts its own spell on the audience. Felice’s familiar, a visibly malevolent cat, was realized here with several models, some more articulate than others. Admittedly, the demon cat’s not as convincing as most of the effects here, but accepting that artifice, as opposed to fighting it, will make the whole experience way more enjoyable. As for the makeup used to manifest Felice’s inner villainy, it is more minimal and subtle than one might like; yet the work done to turn Pacula into an antithesis of herself is nonetheless compelling.
The otherworldly perils and dreadful goings-on wouldn’t work half as well as they do in The Kiss without the story’s contrast effect. Finding frights in picturesque, extremely ordinary settings was something that took off in the ‘80s, thanks to that sweeping shift to locales like the suburbs. And Amy’s home, a replica of a real Montreal suburban house, is the ideal battleground for any proper good-versus-evil story. It’s also prime real estate for this movie’s satanic panic-inspired horrors.
Because of their ostensibly similar plots, The Kiss has been compared to The Exorcist (1973). Except in Densham’s movie, the sinister, non-Christian entity targeting a teen girl lies within something less apparent and, perhaps, more devastating upon its exposure. To an outsider, Pacula’s Aunt Felice is too beautiful and unobjectionable to ever suspect of being a monster. More suspicious is how quickly she rips into the fabric of the Halloran home. Felice’s mere presence upsets the “texture of family life,” according to the director.

The demon cat in The Kiss
Taking out Amy’s mother and best friend, and distracting her father, would suggest The Kiss is playing by a different set of rules. It is initially leaving its adolescent target unsupported in a rather grim scenario. In contrast, though, this story offers up a surrogate parent who does her best to fill in the holes of Amy’s eroding home life. Mimi Kuzyk does good work as that family friend and doctor, Brenda, who guides the lost child without also steering her in any one direction; she is naturally skeptical of Amy’s accusations until it’s almost too late to do anything about them. So although The Kiss does an admirable job of undoing the main character’s support system, it never leaves her without a lifeline. This dark movie, in spite of everything that’s transpired, doesn’t deprive itself of light and hope.
The Kiss is a potent mélange of familiar ideas. If not for the director’s surprise flair for horror, though, the movie would have been less effective. What a shame that Pen Densham didn’t continue with the genre. As for Joanna Pacula, she is, too, owed credit as the wicked vixen opposite Meredith Salenger’s pitiable Amy; she never fails to be unsettling in her role. Pacula makes Aunt Felice a sexy yet intimidating character.
For horror that steadily doles out madness and menace, while also delivering a flashy and ghastly conclusion, The Kiss is certain to please. Yes, it’s cheesy all the way, but most favorably, everyone involved plays everything straight. That kind of commitment goes a long way with this movie.

The Kiss

You must be logged in to post a comment.