Editorials
How To Start Getting Into Horror Part 7: The Original Slashers
I know this is one that many of you have been waiting for, so here it is!
On this week’s edition of ‘How To Start Getting Into Horror‘, we’re gonna dive into the world of slashers. After all, many of us got our start in horror with this genre, be it Halloween, one of the great many Friday The 13th entries, or perhaps we visited dreamland with Freddy in A Nightmare On Elm Street.
Any one of these could’ve been our start, each of them offering a very solid foundation upon which we built our love of the genre. But for someone who is getting into horror and hasn’t yet placed their feet upon solid ground, something else needs to be presented.
And that’s why I think the best place to start is by going back to the beginning, to the place where it all started. That’s right, we’re going to Alfred Hitchcock’s groundbreaking film Psycho.
This is, hands down, one of the greatest films in the horror genre. To this day, it’s still rather terrifying and was, in my opinion, way ahead of its time upon release. After all, it’s credited as being the first real slasher, even though it doesn’t have that high of a body count. But the number of corpses doesn’t matter because it’s really all about the content. Let’s take a deeper look into this film, shall we?
First, it lays the groundwork for understanding how a slasher works. People go to a seemingly innocent location, even though we the audience know that it’s sinister, and then they start getting picked off one by one by a killer that isn’t revealed until the end. Once you understand the “rules”, you can go forth and watch any slasher understanding what to expect, which offers a sense of security.
Second, it’s a fascinating trip into the mind of someone who simply isn’t all there. The story of Norman Bates and his sick obsession with his mother is riveting, especially with Perkins’ stellar performance. While this may be the grandfather of slashers, this is also going to be a great way to get someone interested in the idea of delving into psychological horror films.
Third, the music. By god, the music! Composer Bernard Herrmann was limited to using only strings for the score due to a lowered budget and he made the best of that situation, to put it mildly. If ever there is a moment in horror film history where the score perfectly mirrors the actions on screen, just watch the infamous “shower” clip. Every musical cue is a representation of Janet Leigh and the pain and horror she is experiencing. It’s a masterpiece of all aspects of the film working together to create something astounding.
Fourth, it’s an introduction into the works of Alfred Hitchcock, which is an amazing journey in and of itself. His films are the reason why many horror films exist today, so it’s only fair to devote some time to his offerings.
After watching Psycho, you can absolutely head into the films that I mentioned earlier in this piece. After all, they’re classics in their own right. In fact, you can even think about going straight from this into Scream, which only helps you explain the “rules” as well as set a foundation for how darkly humorous slashers can be. But never forget to pay respect to the original slasher, where it’s absolutely due.
Check out the rest of our How To Start Getting Into Horror series.
Editorials
André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies
In this day and age, the word “troll” is often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.
It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shouts “troll” at the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.
For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.
The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.
As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?
Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.
Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.
There is always a small risk whenever using the term “mockumentary” to describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.
In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.
Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.
Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we call “found footage“.

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.
You must be logged in to post a comment.