Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

How To Start Getting Into Horror Part 9: Psychological

Published

on

For the past two weeks in our How To Start Getting Into Horror series, we took a look at both old and new slashers, pointing out that they can be a great place to have fun while still getting a good amount of scares. I wrestled with myself on what I felt would be the next best place to go in terms of sub-genres, battling between “gore” and “psychological”, weighing the pros and cons of each.

As you can tell by the headline, I ultimately decided upon going with psychological. Head on in to see why and to check out a few film suggestions to kick things off!

Psychological horror films have always been some of favorites. They’re usually the ones that terrify me the most because, in many cases, they could actually happen. It’s all about the sickness and evil of a mind gone bad, which we see occurring in our society all the time. It’s this knowledge that anyone around me might suffer these thoughts that makes these films so deliciously scary.

Now, as you can see, I inserted the trailer for Saw above. Many people might think that it’s the perfect marriage of gore and psychological horror. However, if you rewatch the film, you’ll see that nearly all the gore is offscreen, hidden just far enough away to keep it immediate and visceral but near enough that it feels immediate and real.

But what Saw DOES offer is a fascinating descent into the minds of its characters. Instead of focusing on the traps and gore that every sequel of the franchise had a tendency to do, the original was all about the story and expanding it, one sneaky little clue or revelation at a time. I remember seeing it in theaters and, when the twist at the end came, I was so blown away my jaw actually dropped and I grabbed my head to keep it from exploding Scanners-style. After the credits finished rolling, I immediately bought a ticket to see it again because I had to make sense of what I’d just seen.

However, I would be remiss to suggest that Saw is a great place to start with the psychological horror sub-genre. Rather, I think it’d be good as a lead in to gore, when we get there. While I did mention that the gore in this film is off camera, it’s still a rather shocking film with some terrifyingly “meaty” deaths.

If we want to go full on with psychological, I recommend kicking off the The Shining. It’s in my list of my top horror films of all time and Kubrick’s direction is nothing short of masterful. It’s a terrifying film that doesn’t need gore or jump scares. Instead, it builds tension so thick that even a knife couldn’t stab it. Each new scene adds layers of uncomfortable unease, the madness of Jack Torrance spiraling faster and faster out of control, until it all comes crashing into a climax that challenges the viewers own sanity.

Afterwards, you can go to another film that I absolutely adore: Session 9. I bought this film from Best Buy one day on a whim because it had a cool cover and I had a gift card. It’s possibly the best blind purchase I’ve made and it’s a film that I revisit with great enthusiasm. I’d tell you about the film but, in my opinion, it should be seen as I saw it, completely unaware of what’s in store.

There’s always the classic The Silence Of The Lambs that can be brought to the table. With Academy Awards under its belt, a stellar cast, and a notorious character in the form of Dr. Hannibal Lecter, this film is a must for any fan of film, regardless if they like horror or not.

Additionally, and this film opens the doors to all sorts of interesting sub-genres, you can go with another Stephen King story: The Mist. While there are tons of monsters in this movie, the real villains are the people inside the supermarket. The divide that occurs after only a few days is a fascinating example of how people react in life-or-death situations.

So, there you have it. There’s a list of several films that I feel would be a fantastic choice for diving into the world of psychological horror. There’s obviously a great deal more, such as Se7en or Rosemary’s Baby, the latter of which, just like The Mist, opens the doors to many sub-genres.

If you think of some that people need to check out, let me know in the comments below!

Check out the rest of our How To Start Getting Into Horror series.

Managing editor/music guy/social media fella of Bloody-Disgusting

14 Comments

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading