Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Good Or Bad? When a Movie Franchise Changes Direction

Published

on

When Horror Movie Franchises Change Direction

Horror franchises typically produce diminishing returns as they go on, both creatively and financially. Once a film studio realizes they have a hit on their hands, they quickly start to churn out sequels at a rapid pace in an attempt to make as much money as possible while the franchise is still popular. When a studio has realized that they have milked a franchise for all it is worth, they sometimes try to try a fresh approach and make an installment that is completely different than what came before it. Other times, studios will try to get ahead of themselves and not make a sequel that is just more of the same. Several of the biggest franchises in horror movie history have attempted this approach, so we thought we would take a look at some of them and see what worked and what didn’t about those films. As many of you may know, sometimes people just want more of the same. If a film strays from the formula too much (as is the case with films like Halloween III: Season of the Witch and Friday the 13th: A New Beginning), the backlash from audiences and box office returns* may be so severe that the studio decides to go right back to what they were doing before.

*All box office returns listed below have been adjusted for inflation. So the $22.9 million Friday the 13th: A New Beginning made in 1985 will be written in 2015 dollars: $50.6 million. An inflation calculator was used to convert the numbers.

Remove the Villain

What do you do when you supposedly permanently kill off the centerpiece of your franchise but still want to make a sequel? Leave them out! The two biggest examples (and possibly only, if I’m not mistaken) of this are the aforementioned Halloween III: Season of the Witch and Friday the 13thA New Beginning. Both films were critically maligned at the times of their release and brought in significantly less box office than their predecessors.

Let’s look at the reasoning behind these films. in 1984, Paramount Pictures was looking to end their beloved slasher franchise which, at the time, had only been around for four years. After touting Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter as, you guessed it, the final chapter in the Friday the 13th series, they thought they would be done with the franchise. Unfortunately (or fortunately from a monetary standpoint), The Final Chapter would go on to gross $75.3 million domestically, making it the third-highest grossing film in the franchise (the highest would be the original film, with $114 million). Paramount couldn’t pass up an opportunity to make another sequel, but they had just killed off their star villain. Their idea was to create a new trilogy without Jason, but still center it around Friday the 13th. Unfortunately, ill will was created between Paramount and audiences when they didn’t make that fact very clear. The trailer legitimately promises Jason’s return, something audiences wouldn’t get until 1986.

Needless to say, audiences were not happy. Despite the fact that the film boasts the highest body count in the franchise (a whopping 21 deaths), the highest amount of bare breasts (director Danny Steinmann got his start in the porn industry) and the most frequent use of drugs, it couldn’t make up for the fact that Jason wasn’t in the film. Maybe fan response would have been better if the advertisements hadn’t been so misleading, but it’s possible fans were never going to accept a Friday the 13th movie without Jason Voorhees.

What is mind-boggling about the direction A New Beginning takes is that a spin-off was heavily insinuated at the end of The Final Chapter, with little Tommy Jarvis (Corey Feldman) giving a mischievous look to the camera in the film’s final shot. Rather than go the logical route and follow Tommy’s descent into madness in A New Beginning, the film makes an abrupt departure and has the killer by a random ambulance driver Roy, who snapped after seeing the corpse of his mentally handicapped son.

The film isn’t highly regarded among horror fans and critics alike, and it’s not difficult to understand why. Overall, the film doesn’t really work. I still find it enjoyable, but this is clearly a case when trying something new didn’t work out for a film franchise. A New Beginning will forever be the red-headed stepchild of the Friday the 13th franchise. While it does have somewhat of a cult following among Friday fans, it’s too often looked over in

The same can be said of Halloween III: Season of the Witch. After Halloween II took in less than half of the original Halloween‘s budget ($66.7 million to the original’s massive $171.5 million), director John Carpenter and producer Debra Hill thought it would be a good idea to turn the franchise into an anthology series. This may have seemed like a good idea (and judging by the quality of the sequels after Season of the Witch, I think it was), but once again, audiences just walked out pissed off. What is odd about their reaction though is that Universal made it blatantly obvious in their advertisements that Michael Myers would not, in fact, be in the film.

Halloween III received largely negative reviews upon its release, though recently it has developed somewhat of a cult following. At the time though, it was pretty much hated by everyone and ended up only bringing in $35.5 million domestically.

Halloween III separates itself from the first two films in the Halloween franchise much better than Friday the 13th: A New Beginning separates itself from the first three films in the Friday the 13th franchise. It’s capable of standing on its own and it’s also a better film. It’s no Halloween, to be sure, but it’s still a solid film that has aged well, which is more than can be said for Friday the 13th: A New Beginning.

Still, box office returns at the time of each film’s  release suggest that removing the villain from a franchise is not the best thing to do if you want the film to make money. Since the victims typically rotate in those films, the villain is the only constant in a franchise. If you remove that, then your audience has no relationship to anything in the film. Had those films come out today, audiences probably still would have been disappointed, which is why future horror franchises haven’t attempted this again. Scream switches out its villains, but at the end of the day it’s still Ghostface. Saw, which contains seven films in its franchise killed off its villain at the end of its third installment, but kept him around in flashbacks for the remaining four films.

Overall, it’s probably not a great idea to go this route when deciding to move the franchise in a new direction.

Pages: 1 2 3 4

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

87 Comments

Editorials

How ‘Weapons’, ‘Hokum’, and ‘Widow’s Bay’ Continue Stephen King’s Horror Legacy

Published

on

Unofficial Stephen King adaptations Weapons, Hokum, and Widow's Bay

After fifty years of continuous writing, Stephen King has become a genre unto himself.

The unrivaled Master of Horror made a splash in 1974 with his debut novel Carrie and has been terrifying readers ever since. Two years later, Brian De Palma brought this shocking story to the screen with an equally electrifying horror film that remains a genre classic and a prototypical example of “Good For Her” horror. This dual debut seemed to open the floodgates, unleashing endless waves of Stephen King films.

From the highs of Misery, Cujo, and The Shawshank Redemption to the schlocky fun of Cat’s Eye, Creepshow, and Children of the Corn, the last five decades have seen just about every notable horror creator take a stab at the author’s massive collection. 

In recent years, this singular subgenre has begun to burst at the seams, expanding to include Stephen King-esque fare. In 2016, brothers Matt and Ross Duffer debuted Stranger Things, a sci-fi series heavily inspired by two of King’s most famous books. The Netflix series remixes Firestarter and It by following a little girl with psychic powers and an intrepid group of kids on bikes who must battle an otherworldly foe and a sinister government agency. With its clever blend of modern effects and comforting nostalgia, this gateway horror series paved the way for Andy Muschietti’s It adaptation which remains the highest grossing horror film of all time. 

Four years later, Mike Flanagan would create Midnight Mass, a spiritual adaptation of King’s second novel Salem’s Lot. Published in 1975, the book sees a tiny New England town torn apart by a centuries-old vampire. Though Flanagan’s story is perhaps more tender, both iterations of the classic horror tale follow close-knit communities shaken to their core by the presence of an  ancient evil. 

In addition to these recent hits, 2025 was a banner year for the Master of Horror. Audiences delighted in six mainstream adaptations, including the massively popular It: Welcome to Derry which chronicles earlier cycles of the titular clown’s reign. With this boost to King’s cultural cache, it’s no surprise that we’ve begun to see more unofficial adaptations of the author’s work and horror creators who build their own unique castles in King’s creative sandbox. 

So what defines a Stephen King-esque story?

For the past fifty years, the prolific author has dipped his toes in nearly every subgenre from supernatural stories and grisly gore to western fantasy and science fiction. Including his vast catalogue of short fiction, King has tackled ghosts, demons, werewolves, zombies, aliens, mutants, and self-driving cars, not to mention bizarre monsters of his own creation. But what truly unites this vast array of horror is King’s focus on relatable characters. In his 2000 memoir/instructional text On Writing, the prolific author describes the amusement he finds in writing disparate characters, placing them in horrific scenarios, then exploring the ways they try to survive.

An unofficial Stephen King adaptation may take place in the author’s native New England — bonus points if it’s set in Maine — and reference his well-known heroes and villains. But what makes the King connection unbreakable is a character-driven story about average people who band together in the face of abject terror. 

Weapons Captures Small Town Stephen King

Creepy kid in nightmare vision from Weapons; Zach Cregger reteams with Roy Lee on Little One

Following his 2022 shocker Barbarian, Zach Cregger returned with Weapons, a sprawling story that begins in a doomed elementary school. On an otherwise ordinary day, Justine (Julia Garner) arrives at her desk to find that all but one of her students have disappeared. As the mystery grows increasingly violent, Justine and Archer (Josh Brolin), the father of a missing boy, find their way to the home of Alex (Cary Christopher), the class’ only surviving student. In some ways reminiscent of Salem’s Lot, Weapons swings wildly through the unfortunate town, introducing us to its flawed inhabitants as we watch their lives fall apart.  

Cregger’s setup nods to a pair of King short stories. Both “Suffer the Little Children” and “Here There Be Tygers” tackle monstrous presences in elementary schools, but as Weapons reaches its final act, Constant Readers may remember another Stephen King tale. Featured in his 1985 collection Skeleton Crew, “Gramma” introduces us to George, a little boy tormented by an aging witch. On an afternoon alone with his sickly grandmother, the frightened child gradually realizes that the imposing old woman has been waiting for an opportunity to cast a spell that will extend her own life by possessing his body.  

Alex finds himself similarly tortured by his aunt Gladys (Amy Madigan), a garish witch who orchestrates a desperate plot to sustain her own strength. Transforming humans into mindless weapons, Gladys has taken over Alex’s family home and lured his classmates to the basement. Holding them in a comatose state, she syphons off their energy to extend her own supernatural life.

Vastly different in many ways, both “Gramma” and Weapons hinge on a sinister witch who uses horrific magical spells to sacrifice the bodies of her vulnerable prey. 

Hokum Echoes The Shining and 1408

Hokum first scare is a doozy in exclusive clip

It’s nearly impossible to watch a film about a haunted hotel without thinking of King’s third novel, The Shining. This icy story follows Jack Torrance, an angry writer struggling with his sobriety and a shameful incident haunting his past. Accompanied by his wife and young son, Jack has taken a job as the winter caretaker for the Overlook, a haunted hotel situated high in the Rocky Mountains. Snowed in, Jack finds himself tormented by dangerous ghosts who amplify his greatest fears. 

Damian McCarthy’s Hokum follows a similarly troubled figure. Ohm Bauman (Adam Scott) is a surly writer who travels to the Bilberry Woods Hotel in rural Ireland to spread his parents’ ashes. Haunted by his own tragic past, Ohm finds himself trapped in the honeymoon suite, a decaying room that’s been permanently closed to protect visitors from a dangerous witch trapped within its walls. Visual nods to King’s text abound with woodcut figurines and an animated clock, mirroring ominous descriptions found in King’s text. 

Another terrifying sequence sees Ohm staring with horror at a closed door, the only thing separating him from the approaching witch. As the door knob slowly turns, Constant Readers remember Jack’s narrow escape from the ghostly woman in room 217. And Ohm’s popular Conquistador books directly reference King’s long-running fantasy series The Dark Tower which follows a gunslinger named Roland Deschain tasked with protecting the nexus of the universe. 

In addition to these thematic comparisons, Hokum bears striking resemblance to King’s terrifying short story “1408.” Collected in 2002’s Everything’s Eventual, the terrifying story follows Mike Enslin, a dejected writer who’s risen to fame penning essays about his adventures in haunted locations. Mike arrives at the Hotel Dolphin and bullies his way into the titular room, despite the manager’s dire warnings. McCarthy nods to this story with an ominously misplaced hotel room door, reminiscent of King’s entry to 1408, an unsuspecting portal that appears to move each time Mike looks away. 

However, McCarthy’s most direct reference lies in a minicorder Ohm uses to capture notes. Trapped inside the dreaded honeymoon suite, this device offers well-timed messages while sitting next to a decomposing corpse. Mike records his time in 1408 with his own trusty minicorder. Described for the reader, his tape has captured the man’s slow descent into madness as the room prepares to swallow him whole. With conclusions that differ wildly in tone, both Ohm and Mike find their lives irrevocably changed by encounters with the supernatural realm. 

Widow’s Bay Builds Its Own Version of Castle Rock

Betty Gilpin and Hamish Linklater in "Widow’s Bay," now streaming on Apple TV.

Katie Dippold’s Widow’s Bay has taken the idea of an unofficial King adaptation and turned it into an art form. The Apple TV series sees the residents of the titular island plagued by a curse that dates back centuries. Not only does the picturesque hamlet not accommodate wifi connections, those born on the island face certain death should they ever try to leave. Desperate to modernize the tiny town, Mayor Tom Loftis (Matthew Rhys) draws in waves of tourists just as a new cycle of terror begins. 

Blending horror with deft comedy, Dippold makes cheeky references to King’s body of work. Tom warns that, “there’s something in the fog,” reminding readers of King’s 1980 novella The Mist. And Loftis’ own stay in the town’s haunted hotel sees him tormented by the ghost of a murderous clown. We even spy a vintage King hardback peeking out of a local book trade box.

In many ways Widow’s Bay feels like a new iteration of the author’s Little Tall Island, a tiny village off the coast of Maine. In addition to the 1992 novel Dolores Claiborne and a handful of harrowing short stories, this quaint fishing village is also the setting for King’s 1999 teleplay Storm of the Century. Premiering on ABC primetime, this tragic tale follows a terrified group of islanders who batten down the hatches for a dangerous Nor’easter only to find a more sinister threat lurking within. 

Constant Readers may also be reminded of Castle Rock, the author’s favorite fictional town.

First introduced in the 1981 novel Cujo, the charming village becomes the star of Needful Things, King’s satire about consumerism. After several Castle Rock stories, we’re reintroduced to its residents as they gossip about the arrival of Leland Gaunt and the grand opening of his curio shop. Anything their hearts desire can be found in his varied inventory, so long as they’re willing to pay the price. Pitting cantankerous neighbors against each other, Gaunt ignites a wave of grisly violence by exploiting long-held resentments and feuds. 

The town’s only defense against this supernatural threat is beleaguered sheriff Alan Pangborn. Still grieving the deaths of his wife and younger son, Alan struggles to connect with his older child and pick up the pieces of his shattered life. Also a widower, Loftis struggles to raise his own restless son and explain the strange details of his wife’s tragic death. Attempting to unravel the island’s dark secrets, Tom is aided by quirky residents including a surly fisherman named Wyck (Stephen Root) and Patricia (Kate O’Flynn), an earnest Town Hall employee. King’s own novels feature many of these proactive alliances with disparate characters combining their strengths to overcome insurmountable odds. 

With Widow’s Bay renewed for a second season and Mike Flanagan’s Carrie series on the horizon, the future seems bright for new King adaptations, both spiritual and directly pulled from his catalogue. The prolific author also shows no signs of slowing down with two publications nearing release. His upcoming novel, Other Worlds Than These, is the long-awaited third Talisman book which teases direct ties to his Dark Tower world. Holly Forever will be a new installment of his crime series, offering a different kind of genre fare.

This embarrassment of riches spawning multiple worlds seems ripe for spiritual adaptation and will likely inspire horror creators for decades to come.

Kate O’Flynn, Stephen Root and Matthew Rhys in “Widow’s Bay,” now streaming on Apple TV.

Continue Reading