Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Can 2016 Horror Improve on 2015 Horror?

Published

on

The Blackcoat's Daughter (FEBRUARY) via A24

Last month, I lamented the fact my opinion that 2015 hadn’t really been that great of a year for horror. There were a lot of films that I thought were alright, but very few that I thought were great. Mr. Disgusting disagreed with me, but I stand by my opinion. This is mostly because I didn’t include horror films that only screened at festivals and he did. Had I included those festival films in my end-of-year lists, I would have 100% agreed with Mr. Disgusting. As you may have seen from some of my posts this week, horror fans have a lot to look forward to in 2016, and I can confidently say that as long as many of the independent films I’ve seen get released, we are all in for several treats this year. I wanted to take some time to look back at 2015 to see what exactly went wrong, and how 2016 can (and probably will) improve on it.

Before we dive into things, let’s tale a look at the majority of genre films that came out in 2015. Below is a spreadsheet I made when I was making my end-of-year lists and is comprised of pretty much every film that was up for consideration on any of my lists last month. You will note that calling some of these films horror films or even “genre” films is a bit of a stretch, so forgive me for that. I just wanted to cover all of my bases. There is also a chance I missed a film or two, so also forgive me for that. Anyway, here we are:

2015 Horror Films

If we were grading the major studio releases from 2015, the year wouldn’t receive very high marks (I’m thinking a solid C). Just looking at this list, the films that received a wide release (which I’m qualifying as over 1,000 U.S. theaters) were

Crimson Peak
The Gallows
The Gift
The Green Inferno
Insidious: Chapter 3
It Follows
Krampus
The Lazarus Effect
Paranormal Activity: The Ghost Dimension
Poltergeist
Scouts Guide to the Zombie Apocalypse
Sinister 2
Unfriended
The Visit
The Woman in Black 2: Angel of Death

 

 

 

 

 

That is only 15 wide release films this year, and of those 15 about three of them are great, four are good, four of them are mediocre and the other four are terrible. That is of course just my opinion, but that seems to go with the general consensus as well.

Looking at the other 53 friends on this list, it’s clear that independent horror had a better 2015 than widely released studio horror films did, but even they didn’t have a large amount of truly standout films. There were a couple of fun surprises, but when taken as a whole there just aren’t that many films that you’re going to remember in 10 years. 2015 actually led to quite a few crushing disappointments in the horror genre.

That may be a bit of a contentious statement, but other than films like The Final Girls, Backcountry, Bone Tomahawk and Spring (the latter two of which I regrettably left off of my “Best Of” list last year), nothing made much of an impression. I know many of you adored Deathgasm, but it just wasn’t my cup o’ tea.

When you think of a great year for horror, which year(s) do you think of? The obvious choices would be 1978 (Halloween, Dawn of the Dead, Piranha, I Spit On Your Grave), 1984 (A Nightmare on Elm Street, Gremlins, Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter) and 1997 (Scream 2, I Know What You Did Last Summer, Mimic, Anaconda). Okay, that last one is more or less my favorite year for horror because I love all of those movies, but I’m in the minority there.

Scream 2

Courteney Cox in Scream 2

I would argue that in the 21st century we haven’t had a better year than 2009, which saw the releases of films like Drag Me to Hell, The House of the Devil, The Collector, Zombieland, Dead Snow, Grace, Jennifer’s Body, Sorority Row, The Loved Ones, Laid to Rest, [REC] 2, the remake of The Last House on the Left and Saw VI (What? I like that one). Looking at the list of 2015 films, are there a large number of films that you think you will look back on and say “Man, 2015 was a really great year for horror?” If you do, that’s awesome. I respectfully disagree.

Mind you, it is not my intent to completely shit on 2015 horror films. I did like many of the films, there just weren’t that many that blew me away. There were a ton of films that were “just fine,” but I would like something more. Maybe that is asking too much from a bunch of horror films, but it really shouldn’t be. The reason why I feel sort of let down by 2015 horror is that I have had a small sampling of what is to come in 2016, and it’s glorious.

When we look at 2016, there is definitely a wider variety of different types of films that are getting released, and many more widely released studio horror films. Below is a list of the majority of the genre films seeing a release this year, but it is possible that I missed a few.

2016 Horror Films

Of course, 2016 has already gotten off to a pretty bad start with The Forest (review), but I implore you to be patient. There were five films I saw at Fantastic Fest back in September that I am 90% sure will end up on my “Best Of” 2016 list in December (some of them already made Mr. Disgusting’s “Best of 2015” list). And it’s not just that they would make the cut because they’re probably going to be the best compared to everything else, it’s that they are legitimately great films that I am positive I will be telling people to watch years from now. In an attempt to avoid over-hype, I won’t name these films, but you can find my reviews for them online.

It is impossible to predict whether or not all of the films on this list could improve upon the films released last year. Admittedly, I’ve only seen 14 out of the 70 films on this list, but the fact that I have found a good chunk of those 14 to be spectacular is pretty impressive.

I apologize for the blog-iness of this post, but I’m using this as an experiment to see how posts like this resonate with all of the readers (you). I’m actually more curious to know how all of you feel. Think back to a year ago. Were there a lot of films you were really looking forward to? How many of them lived up to your expectations?

Will I be right or will I be wrong about the quality of 2016 horror? Can 2016 horror improve on 2015 horror? My answer is an unequivocal “yes.” Check back with me in a year and we can see how accurate I was.

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

99 Comments

Editorials

‘The Mandela Catalogue’ Explained: Inside Alex Kister’s Viral Analog Horror Phenomenon

Published

on

The Mandela Catalogue explained

I first heard about The Mandela Catalogue through a couple of nephews who were obsessed with the ARG’s sinister mythology. It was only after watching Wendigoon’s in-depth analysis of the series that I realized just how deep this rabbit hole goes.

In fact, I’d already been exposed to the nightmarish visuals of Alex Kister’s YouTube creation for years at that point without even realizing that it was the origin of several viral “cursed images” and spooky memes that had leaked into the wider internet – with this viral element actually being a part of the Catalogue’s overarching narrative.

Flash-forward to 2026 and the unprecedented success of Kane Parsons’ Backrooms has led to Hollywood betting on horrific internet properties with existing fanbases, which means that Kister’s unique hybrid of both religious and analog horror is finally headed to the big screen with a script written by Kister himself alongside Tyler Clifton.

While this news shouldn’t be too surprising if you’ve been keeping up with the ongoing success of The Mandela Catalogue (both myself and Wendigoon having previously predicted that the series would inevitably make the jump to theaters one day), plenty of horror fans are likely confused as to why so many folks are excited for what appears to be a Hollywood adaptation of a series of creepy .jpeg images under a VHS filter.

With that in mind, today I’d like to invite fellow readers to accompany me as I explore the origins of Alex Kister’s viral hit and attempt to explain exactly why we should all be excited about the Mandela Catalogue adaptation!

From High School Writing Project to Internet Horror Phenomenon

The first seeds of The Mandela Catalogue were sown when Kister was still in high school and developed a writing project subverting religious tropes in a world where biblical history had been altered by demonic forces. A little while later, Kister came across an analog horror contest on Reddit and decided to adapt his ideas into a standalone video where he would edit a religious kids’ cartoon –The Beginner’s Bible: The Nativity, to be specific- into something far creepier. This is how the iconic Overthrone video was born, with this viral short film taking on a life of its own as fans demanded more eerie content from Kister.

Though the video was originally meant to be a one-and-done sort of affair, with Kister actually regretting some of its primitive visuals and considering the editing amateurish and “YouTube-Poop-like” when compared to his current standards, fan reaction and free time during the COVID-19 pandemic encouraged the (then) seventeen-year-old filmmaker to continue producing content set in this same world. The Mandela Catalogue name was inspired by the Mandela Effect conspiracy theory, as the series would slowly begin to explore the subtle horror of alternate histories.

Inspired by existential dread brought on by extended periods of quarantine as well as a personal crisis of faith, Kister continued to expand his alternate timeline where the rise of Christianity had been prevented by what was presumably the Devil disguised as the Archangel Gabriel. This alternate course of fictional events led to the existence of certain paranormal anomalies that had come to be accepted as “normal” by the 1990s, which is why most of the series’ supernatural horror is presented in such a matter-of-fact manner.

Most of this background information and religious lore is delivered by increasingly cryptic broadcasts and in-universe PSAs, as well as the occasional found footage video, that often have to be decoded by clever viewers. Of course, it’s the consistently disturbing imagery that made the series so popular – much of which was originally created by Kister on a smartphone!

The Alternates: Horror’s Most Unsettling Modern Monsters

The show’s early episodes mostly take place within the fictional Mandela County in Wisconsin and depict life in a world where demonic entities are capable of using media to enter our reality. This process usually involves scaring victims into killing themselves and then repurposing their bodies as horrific doppelgangers referred to as “Alternates”. This terrifying phenomenon has become so common that local police already have specialized procedures in place to deal with the issue, though this usually consists of simply ignoring calls for help so as to avoid spreading so-called “Metaphysical Awareness Disorder” any further.

Over time, Kister would expand this mythology and incorporate different kinds of Alternates into the mix, though the story never stopped deconstructing religious concepts. The series’ second volume exponentially increased both video quality and the overall narrative scope as we began to follow the lives of characters who had already grown up in this dystopian hellscape where the government is forced to prohibit religion, television, and even mirrors in the hopes of mitigating the damage done by the ongoing invasion of otherworldly entities.

The really interesting part comes into play when you realize exactly how the Alternates make use of scary media in order to spread their demonic influence, with the analog horror of it all being a diegetic part of the story and something of a memetic trap orchestrated by the false Gabriel.

I particularly appreciate how some characters begin to suspect that there’s something wrong with their version of reality and that things weren’t meant to play out this way, especially when Mark utters the haunting line “who have I been praying to all this time?” That’s why I think The Mandela Catalogue is an effective piece of religious horror even if you don’t subscribe to the Christian worldview, as the mere idea of a world where evil has already won is a universally terrifying concept in and of itself. Not only that, but the series’ uncanny analog imagery alone is already worth the price of admission, as you’ve likely already noticed by looking at the pictures accompanying this article.

Why The Feature Adaptation Could Be Horror’s Next Big Success

It’s actually been a whole year since Kister first announced that he had been working on a feature-length screenplay for a Mandela Catalogue movie since 2022, with his proposed story following an ensemble of high-school graduates who uncover a supernatural conspiracy after the mysterious disappearance of a fellow student. This premise sounds similar to narrative elements present in the series’ second volume, but I’m pretty sure that Kister is going to go the Kane Parsons route and make the movie more of a spin-off than a re-imagining of its source material.

While notable Hollywood producers like Aaron B. Koontz, Scott Stuber, and Steven Spielberg himself are backing the upcoming project, I feel like there’s no one better to adapt this deeply personal exploration of faith and the dark side of communication than the person who first came up with it. That’s why I can’t wait to see Kister’s work on the big screen, as I have a feeling that this young filmmaker is the next one on the list about to make cinematic history – especially since this is clearly a passion project that has been in the works for years at this point!

That being said, there’s always a chance that the film could end up unleashing a fresh wave of Alternate incursions, but I guess that’s just a risk we’ll have to take.

Continue Reading