Connect with us

Editorials

Can 2016 Horror Improve on 2015 Horror?

Published

on

The Blackcoat's Daughter (FEBRUARY) via A24

Last month, I lamented the fact my opinion that 2015 hadn’t really been that great of a year for horror. There were a lot of films that I thought were alright, but very few that I thought were great. Mr. Disgusting disagreed with me, but I stand by my opinion. This is mostly because I didn’t include horror films that only screened at festivals and he did. Had I included those festival films in my end-of-year lists, I would have 100% agreed with Mr. Disgusting. As you may have seen from some of my posts this week, horror fans have a lot to look forward to in 2016, and I can confidently say that as long as many of the independent films I’ve seen get released, we are all in for several treats this year. I wanted to take some time to look back at 2015 to see what exactly went wrong, and how 2016 can (and probably will) improve on it.

Before we dive into things, let’s tale a look at the majority of genre films that came out in 2015. Below is a spreadsheet I made when I was making my end-of-year lists and is comprised of pretty much every film that was up for consideration on any of my lists last month. You will note that calling some of these films horror films or even “genre” films is a bit of a stretch, so forgive me for that. I just wanted to cover all of my bases. There is also a chance I missed a film or two, so also forgive me for that. Anyway, here we are:

2015 Horror Films

If we were grading the major studio releases from 2015, the year wouldn’t receive very high marks (I’m thinking a solid C). Just looking at this list, the films that received a wide release (which I’m qualifying as over 1,000 U.S. theaters) were

Crimson Peak
The Gallows
The Gift
The Green Inferno
Insidious: Chapter 3
It Follows
Krampus
The Lazarus Effect
Paranormal Activity: The Ghost Dimension
Poltergeist
Scouts Guide to the Zombie Apocalypse
Sinister 2
Unfriended
The Visit
The Woman in Black 2: Angel of Death

 

 

 

 

 

That is only 15 wide release films this year, and of those 15 about three of them are great, four are good, four of them are mediocre and the other four are terrible. That is of course just my opinion, but that seems to go with the general consensus as well.

Looking at the other 53 friends on this list, it’s clear that independent horror had a better 2015 than widely released studio horror films did, but even they didn’t have a large amount of truly standout films. There were a couple of fun surprises, but when taken as a whole there just aren’t that many films that you’re going to remember in 10 years. 2015 actually led to quite a few crushing disappointments in the horror genre.

That may be a bit of a contentious statement, but other than films like The Final Girls, Backcountry, Bone Tomahawk and Spring (the latter two of which I regrettably left off of my “Best Of” list last year), nothing made much of an impression. I know many of you adored Deathgasm, but it just wasn’t my cup o’ tea.

When you think of a great year for horror, which year(s) do you think of? The obvious choices would be 1978 (Halloween, Dawn of the Dead, Piranha, I Spit On Your Grave), 1984 (A Nightmare on Elm Street, Gremlins, Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter) and 1997 (Scream 2, I Know What You Did Last Summer, Mimic, Anaconda). Okay, that last one is more or less my favorite year for horror because I love all of those movies, but I’m in the minority there.

Scream 2

Courteney Cox in Scream 2

I would argue that in the 21st century we haven’t had a better year than 2009, which saw the releases of films like Drag Me to Hell, The House of the Devil, The Collector, Zombieland, Dead Snow, Grace, Jennifer’s Body, Sorority Row, The Loved Ones, Laid to Rest, [REC] 2, the remake of The Last House on the Left and Saw VI (What? I like that one). Looking at the list of 2015 films, are there a large number of films that you think you will look back on and say “Man, 2015 was a really great year for horror?” If you do, that’s awesome. I respectfully disagree.

Mind you, it is not my intent to completely shit on 2015 horror films. I did like many of the films, there just weren’t that many that blew me away. There were a ton of films that were “just fine,” but I would like something more. Maybe that is asking too much from a bunch of horror films, but it really shouldn’t be. The reason why I feel sort of let down by 2015 horror is that I have had a small sampling of what is to come in 2016, and it’s glorious.

When we look at 2016, there is definitely a wider variety of different types of films that are getting released, and many more widely released studio horror films. Below is a list of the majority of the genre films seeing a release this year, but it is possible that I missed a few.

2016 Horror Films

Of course, 2016 has already gotten off to a pretty bad start with The Forest (review), but I implore you to be patient. There were five films I saw at Fantastic Fest back in September that I am 90% sure will end up on my “Best Of” 2016 list in December (some of them already made Mr. Disgusting’s “Best of 2015” list). And it’s not just that they would make the cut because they’re probably going to be the best compared to everything else, it’s that they are legitimately great films that I am positive I will be telling people to watch years from now. In an attempt to avoid over-hype, I won’t name these films, but you can find my reviews for them online.

It is impossible to predict whether or not all of the films on this list could improve upon the films released last year. Admittedly, I’ve only seen 14 out of the 70 films on this list, but the fact that I have found a good chunk of those 14 to be spectacular is pretty impressive.

I apologize for the blog-iness of this post, but I’m using this as an experiment to see how posts like this resonate with all of the readers (you). I’m actually more curious to know how all of you feel. Think back to a year ago. Were there a lot of films you were really looking forward to? How many of them lived up to your expectations?

Will I be right or will I be wrong about the quality of 2016 horror? Can 2016 horror improve on 2015 horror? My answer is an unequivocal “yes.” Check back with me in a year and we can see how accurate I was.

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading