Editorials
Happy 35th Anniversary to ‘The Burning!’
35 years ago, Tony Maylam’s not-so-classic slasher film The Burning was unleashed upon the world. Released exactly one year after Sean S. Cunningham’s blockbuster Friday the 13th and just one week after Friday the 13th Part 2, The Burning took in a measly $707,770 at the box office (and that includes the box office returns for the re-release in November of 1982). With a reported budget of $1.5 million, it was considered a flop. Audiences just weren’t that interested in The Burning when they could flock to the established Friday the 13th franchise (well, soon-to-be franchise anyway). In recent years, The Burning has gained a cult following and a reexamination from critics. While it doesn’t reinvent the wheel in any way, The Burning is still a respectable genre effort with a likable cast and top-notch make-up effects from the master himself: Tom Savini.
The Burning is technically Miramax’s first movie. Co-written by Peter Lawrence and Bob Weinstein, the film was also produced by Harvey Weinstein in his first gig as a film producer. Harvey was desperate to get into the movie business at the time, so after seeing the success of low budget horror films (slashers, specifically) he began brainstorming ideas for a similarly-budgeted film. He remembered the Cropsey legend from campfire tales he heard at summer camp when he was born and The Burning (and Cropsy, sans Cropsey’s “e”) was born.
The script was written in six weeks and Tony Maylam was brought on as director. Since the film was set in the summer time and Weinstein wanted to get the film released before the slasher craze ended, The Burning was rushed into production. While many may see it as a ripoff of Friday the 13th, the film actually started production (meaning a treatment written by Weinstein) a whole year before that film was even released. It just had the misfortune of coming out a year later. Who’s to say what would have happened if The Burning had been released first. Maybe Cropsy would have been an even bigger slasher giant than Jason Voorhees himself.
The film is also famous for being the first on-screen appearances for now-famous actors Holly Hunter and Jason Alexander. Alexander has the most to do in the film as lovable camper Dave and Hunter gets maybe two lines of dialogue as random camper Sophie, but it’s still fun to watch her. Fisher Stevens has the most fun as the goofy Woodstock before getting killed in the outstanding raft massacre set piece.
Speaking of the raft massacre, one can’t discuss The Burning without mentioning it’s top-notch make-up effects from Tom Savini. Interestingly enough, he turned down working on Friday the 13th Part 2 because he didn’t buy the logic that Jason would be the villain in the film. Thinking that the script for The Burning was superior, Savini chose to lend his talents to that film. He even lent his legs to the film (his legs are the ones getting burned in the opening sequence that gives the film its namesake). The Burning is filled with great kills (in the latter half of the film anyway, but more on that in a bit), but the pièce de résistance comes in the form of the film’s raft sequence, in which Cropsy dispatches a group of campers in the middle of the lake (though it takes a laughably long time for them to make it to the raft after they see it).
Not surprisingly, the film suffered many cuts in order to avoid an X rating from the MPAA. Many of the kills are even more graphic versions of similar kills in Friday the 13th (Karen’s death is a bloodier version of Annie’s death and Cropsy’s death is a much more graphic version of Marcie’s death), showing that Savini was willing to improve upon his previous efforts.
Unlike many slasher films of the time, The Burning takes a good while to get going. It isn’t until the 49-minute mark when the first camper (poor, nude Karen) meets her demise. And before that the only death was a prostitute that Cropsy picked up after his release from the hospital. While this may seem like slasher sacrilege, it actually works in favor of the film. There’s only one or two truly unlikable characters in the film (Glazer and arguably Todd), but the rest of the cast is filled with likable characters. While it would be a stretch to say it’s “fun” to spend time with these characters, their likability at least makes The Burning’s slow beginning bearable. Plus, it’s really sad to see Karen bite it. She didn’t even get to have sex!
The Burning also boasts a lot of effective jump scares. I admit that even though I had seen the film before, there were several moments that had me jumping off my couch (Glazer’s death being the most memorable example). Of course this is mostly thanks to Rick Wakeman’s (of the band Yes) creepy score, but it’s still incredibly effective even by today’s standards.
What are your thoughts on The Burning? Do you think it’s an under-appreciated film? Or do you think it’s just another run-of-the-mill copycat of films like Halloween and Friday the 13th? Let us know in the comments below and share your thoughts and memories of the film.
Editorials
Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel
The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.
That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.
It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.
That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.
The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’
For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.
This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.
This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.
Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.
So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.
The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.
Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.
While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.
At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.
After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.
You must be logged in to post a comment.