Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

We Should Be Celebrating: The Return of Ghostbusters is Bigger Than the Reboot

Published

on

Few movies in the history of cinema are as universally hated as Paul Feig’s Ghostbusters reboot, which is quite interesting because at the time of writing this post, we’re two months away from anyone actually seeing it. Before production even began, many diehard fans of the original film – and the deeply cherished franchise as a whole – had already decided that they hated everything about what Feig and company were trying to do, and that pre-release hate has been reflected by the nearly one-million down-votes the official trailer has to date received over on YouTube.

Simply put, Ghostbusters is already the most hated movie of all time.

Why all the hate? Well, a good portion of it comes from the fact that the original Ghostbusters is one of the most beloved movies of all time, so it was only natural that a remake of any sort would immediately rub many the wrong way. And whether anyone wants to admit it or not, the all-female main cast has been a large source of disdain when it comes to this particular project. Granted, it’s totally out of line to suggest that the mere opinion of not being into the film somehow makes you sexist, but you need only browse the comments underneath the aforementioned YouTube trailer to realize that there’s a whole lot of sexism currently being spread around the Ghostbusters community. It’s just the truth. A sad, ugly truth.

I’m not here to defend the film, as I of course have not yet seen it, but what I would like to propose to all Ghostbusters fans is that we not only hold off on making any judgments, but also spend these next two months appreciating something pretty awesome that is happening out there in the world. Whether it turns out to be a hunk of junk or a brand new comedy-horror gem for a whole new generation of fans – we won’t know until two months from now – the Ghostbusters reboot has already served to make the franchise more popular than it had been in quite some time. And if you consider yourself a fan of that franchise, I can’t think of a single reason why you wouldn’t be jumping for joy right about now.

New Ghostbusters Toys

Over the weekend I took a trip to my local Toys R Us and couldn’t help but smile ear-to-ear when I saw all the brand new Ghostbusters toys lining the shelves, which is something I hadn’t seen in many years. There was a squishy Slimer and a light-up Stay Puft Marshallow Man, as well as several Ecto-1 vehicles in different sizes and even a much cooler-looking Proton Pack than the one I remember playing with as a kid. Of course, that’s not even counting all the toys of new characters we haven’t yet met, and I must admit that based on the toy and the toy alone, I’ve already fallen in love with new villain Rowan.

In the interest of full disclosure, I’m playing with Rowan as I type this post.

Like the original film, the Ghostbusters reboot has spawned a full-on merchandising blitz, and what’s available in stores right now is merely the tip of the iceberg. Coming soon are “Key Lime Slime” Twinkies, character-shaped marshmallows, and all kinds of LEGOs, and let’s not forget the holy grail of all holy grails: on May 30th, Ecto Cooler is FINALLY coming back. And guess what? Even if you see the reboot and you absolutely hate it, and even if you flat out refuse to ever see it, you still get to enjoy all the incredible merchandise that it’s bringing along with it – most of which, it must be pointed out, is tied to the original franchise. Hell, we’re even getting brand new action figures of those original characters courtesy of Mattel, and the 1984 classic is soon being re-released into theaters, so there’s very little to not be happy about at the moment.

I repeat: ECTO COOLER IS COMING BACK.

Look, I get it. You LOVE Ghostbusters, and your hatred for the impending reboot is, underneath it all, a reflection of that very passion. The franchise means so very much to you, and it’s totally fair for you to be averse to the very idea of something you love being turned into something that may not actually be for you. But at the end of the day, the new movie is ultimately a small aspect of the full-on Ghostbusters resurgence it is directly responsible for, and if you choose to embrace that pop culture revival rather than resist it, I can almost promise that these next two months will be a whole lot of fun for you.

At the very least, I hope you smile when your taste buds reunite with Ecto Cooler.

I hope you feel like a kid again.

ecto cooler

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has two awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

88 Comments

Editorials

‘Bloodlust: Subspecies III’ Remains One of Full Moon’s Greatest Achievements

Published

on

Bloodlust: Subspecies III

The problem with filming sequels back-to-back is that, unless you can afford expensive reshoots, there’s no easy way to adjust course in between movies if fans react badly to where the story is headed. That’s why it’s important to have a complete narrative thought out well in advance lest you accidentally kill a budding franchise.

However, this isn’t always the case. Every once in a while, it seems like the cinema gods smile upon certain chaotic productions and gift moviegoers with complete franchises that feel like more than the sum of their hastily produced parts. Ted Nicolaou’s Bloodlust: Subspecies III is precisely one of these miraculous pictures, with the raw talents of the artists involved (as well as the continued support from Romania) turning the feature into an effective conclusion for a series that kind of made things up as the filmmakers went along.

That’s why I’d like to invite my fellow readers to join me on this third part of our journey through the Subspecies franchise as we look into Bloodlust and talk about how it remains a surprisingly satisfying finale to the original trilogy.

A Trilogy Planned on the Fly

Released only a year after Bloodstone found plenty of success in rental stores and mail-in VHS catalogues worldwide, 1994’s Bloodlust was produced at the same time as its predecessor in (mostly) the same locations and with the same team. This means that the movie benefited from all the same upgrades as Bloodstone, with the crew now being more experienced with the ins and outs of surviving a low-budget Romanian production and the cast really settling into their characters.

At this point, everything from location scouting to the makeup process had been streamlined, with Wayne Toth and Norman Cabrera, the main duo behind special effects, even switching out time-consuming prosthetics for latex gloves in order to speed up Anders Hove’s monstrous transformation. The titular “subspecies” demons were also once again relegated to a mere cameo appearance due to the laborious puppetry required to bring them to life.

The only real hiccup came from the fact that actress Denice Duff had replaced the first film’s Michelle (Laura Mae Tate) and was immediately expected to portray the character as both an innocent victim in part II and as a secondary villain in part III. According to behind-the-scenes interviews, the hectic production schedule that blended two different movies meant that Duff would often find herself having to alternate between two incredibly different versions of Michelle during the same shooting day – though it’s obvious that she’s having more fun with Bloodlust’s more traditionally vampiric version of her character.

In the finished film, we pick things up immediately where the previous entry left off as Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) is forced to leave her vampire sister Michelle (Duff) behind in the dungeons of Castle Vladislav due to the rising sun. This allows Mummy (Pamela Gordon) to use Michelle’s blood to revive the vicious Radu (Hove) so that he may continue his quest for the coveted Bloodstone – a magical artifact that perpetually drips the Blood of Saints.

Meanwhile, the dreamy US embassy agent Mel (Kevin Blair) agrees to help Rebecca plan a rescue mission, though they’re unaware that Radu has become infatuated with Michelle during his attempts to guide her growing bloodlust. This all culminates in a climactic confrontation meant to tie up all of the series’ loose ends in one of Full Moon Pictures’ most ambitious productions.

The Evolution of Radu

Like its predecessor, Bloodlust: Subspecies III was also warmly received by fans who argued that the series was an even bigger success than Full Moon’s other major horror franchise, Puppet Master. This praise wasn’t unanimous, however, as 1994 had seen the rise of a more modern breed of sexy vampire popularized by Anne Rice, with old-school Nosferatu like Radu being viewed as obsolete when compared to the likes of Lestat and Gary Oldman’s take on Dracula.

In a way, one might argue that Nicolaou’s film is something of a swan song for the classic vampire story, as Bloodlust combines all of the traditional elements we tend to associate with these tales into a single tragic yarn that ties a neat little bow on Radu’s story as well as the old-fashioned monster movies that he represents. The finale remains shocking despite the fact that this is the third time we see Radu get brutally killed onscreen, with the brief tease that he may one day return feeling more like a nod towards the nature of evil rather than sequel bait.

The film dabbles a bit in gothic romance and even explores the inherent power fantasy behind transforming into an immortal creature of the night, but the filmmakers never lose sight of Radu as a demonic force even when he’s willing to betray his beloved Mummy for Michelle’s sake. In fact, his twisted “love” for his fledgling makes him even creepier as we get the feeling that his passion comes from a dark and disturbing place.

Anders Hove is at his absolute best in this film, with the effects department boosting his moments of what the younger generation would call “aura farming” whenever Radu emerges from shadows like a 90s version of Count Orlok. There are even a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares here, which is why I’d argue that Bloodlust cements Radu as one of the most memorable cinematic vampires of all time despite his humble origins.

Subspecies Saves Its Best For Last

Nicolaou and Vlad Panescu also saved the best for “last” (more on that in a bit) regarding the film’s visuals, with the cinematography and overall atmosphere of Bloodlust absolutely surpassing what we saw in the previous films. Everything feels appropriately climactic this time around (including the wonderful soundtrack that was co-composed alongside an authentic Romanian orchestra), and I appreciate how this is the fastest-paced entry in the trilogy since the film doesn’t need to waste time setting anything up.

Bloodlust still suffers from some of the same low-budget blemishes as its predecessors, but there’s so much creative passion here that no amount of wonky effects work or stilted dialogue can get in the way of appreciating the flick’s gothic grandeur. That’s why it’s not surprising that the movie’s definitive(-ish) ending would later be retconned as fans begged for more Radu.

Of course, the next entry in this series would be a different kind of vampiric endeavor altogether, with the filmmakers attempting to engage with the same trends that ultimately killed Radu and his antiquated kin. That, however, is a story for another time. For now, I’ll merely insist that Bloodlust: Subspecies III remains a highlight of Full Moon’s expansive catalogue and is definitely worth seeking out today.

Continue Reading