Connect with us

Editorials

8 Great Book-To-Film Horror Adaptations!

Published

on

Book to Film Adaptation

We all know the old adage: “The movie is never as good as the book.” Well sometimes that’s just not true! Sometimes the movie version can actually fix a lot of the novel’s mistakes, especially if the book isn’t exactly classic literature (looking at you Jaws). I’ve put together a list of some horror films that actually improved upon the books they were based on (or at least did the book justice)! “But Trace,” you ask, “didn’t you already write a post extremely similar to this one but with a much more click bait-y title last year?” And the answer is yes. Yes I did, but this has a much less click bait-y title and I’m taking a different angle, so ha! Anyway, now that the elephant in the room has been addressed, here we go:

Rosemary’s Baby

Ira Levin’s novel is one of the greatest novels ever written (though I’m partial to The Stepford Wives), but Roman Polanski’s film adaptation does a wonderful job of enhancing the atmosphere and dread that Levin so masterfully described. Let’s just forget the TV miniseries ever happened, alright?

Book to Film Adaptation

The Exorcist

If you ever want to read something truly horrifying, simply read William Peter Blatty’s description of a Black Mass in The Exorcist. The novel is a fascinating read, but the film, written by Blatty and directed by William Friedkin, surpasses the novel in every way imaginable. It’s almost difficult to believe that, like many films now considered classics, it had a mixed reception upon its initial release!

Book to Film Adaptations

Jaws

As I mentioned above, Jaws fixes a lot of Peter Benchley’s novel’s mistakes. Gone is the subplot involving Ellen’s affair with Matt (as well as Matt’s death in the shark cage) and some other superfluous subplots. Steven Spielberg injected some humanity into the characters, something the novel was sorely lacking. Also, the ending is a bit more cathartic. In the novel, the shark merely drowns. Spielberg thought the audience deserved something a little more explosive, so that’s what he gave us!

Book to Film Adaptations

The Howling

Truthfully, I have not read Gary Brandner’s The Howling, but I have seen the movie, and I can’t imagine the novel would be much better! If anything the ending of the film, in which Karen (Dee Wallace) turns into a werewolf on live television, certainly beats the ending of the novel, in which Karen just escapes the burning mountain village while hearing the sound of howling in the distance.

Book to Film Adaptations

The Thing

John W. Campbell, Jr.’s novella has been adapted quite a few times, but the best adaptation is arguably John Carpenter’s 1982 film The Thing, a horror film so masterful that it still sets the standard for practical effects today. Hell, a lot of movies made today can’t match the practical effects in The Thing. It’s almost hard to believe it was reviled upon its initial release, but The Thing is the level of quality all adaptations (and remakes) should strive to achieve.

Book to Film Adaptations

American Psycho

Unfilmable shmunfilmable! Mary Harron took Bret Easton Ellis’ novel and transformed it into something special (and a little bit easier to swallow). Ellis’ novel is fantastic and a scathing critique on capitalism, but it can get bogged down by the endless (and I mean endless) lists of brand names (I get the point, but it did make the book difficult to get through). The book may have the gore, but Harron’s film has the style. It is a worthy adaptation of Ellis’ controversial novel.

Book to Film Adaptations

Audition

Asami sure does look a lot more innocent as an anime cartoon, doesn’t she? Ryu Murakami’s novel is good, don’t get me wrong. It’s just that Takashi Miike’s direction is simply more impressive when it comes to Audition. It is not a film for everyone (it took me about three viewings to fully appreciate it), but you can’t deny the visceral impact the films has on its viewers.

Book to Film Adaptations

The Ruins

Truthfully, The Ruins is not better than Scott Smith’s novel (which is odd considering that Smith wrote the screenplay for the film), but I will defend this movie about evil vines until the day I die. What played so well on the page could have easily come across as silly on film (comparisons to Little Shop of Horrors were abundant when the film was initially released) and The Ruins thankfully manages to avoid delving into campy territory. These plants are vicious. While the film may not surpass the novel in terms of quality, it is still a shining example of a novel adapted correctly.

Book to Film Adaptations

Which horror movie do you think improved upon the book it was based on? Let us know in the comments below!

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading