Editorials
Here’s How To Bring ‘Jaws’ Back and Make Fans Happy
Whether you loved it (like me) or hated it (like someone who’s not me), one thing you should at least appreciate about The Shallows is that it’s one of the very few serious shark movies to come along in the past several decades. Save for so few notable exceptions that I can count them on one hand, minus a couple fingers, post-Jaws shark flicks have been laughably bad and over-the-top silly, often quite intentionally. But with his latest film, Jaume Collet-Serra admirably does a whole lot of course correction for the sub-genre that began with, and was totally defined by, Spielberg’s legendary classic.
The surprising box office success of The Shallows certainly seems to prove that audiences are hungry for shark cinema that packs a bite, especially when it’s smartly timed to the start of Discovery’s hugely popular Shark Week, and I can’t help but wonder if we may have a new annual tradition on our hands. Will Collet-Serra’s horror hit lead to a resurgence of sharksploitation films? More importantly, has the groundwork just been laid for the inevitable return of the long-dead Jaws franchise?
Given how dominated the current summer landscape is by reboots and sequels to beloved properties, it’s surprising that Jaws, the film that essentially coined the term “summer blockbuster,” has managed to avoid the remake chopping block these past 40 years. The franchise last swam its way onto the big screen with series-killer Jaws: The Revenge back in 1987, and in the past thirty years, not a peep has been heard from it. You won’t find me complaining about that, but if you know how Hollywood works, you’ve probably realized by now that it won’t be much longer before Jaws surfaces from the deep.
The smartest way to bring Jaws back? It’s damn sure not with a remake.
While watching The Shallows, I was struck with the feeling that I was watching a Jaws movie that wasn’t marketed as a Jaws movie. In other words, if it was re-branded in post-production and released into theaters as Jaws: The Shallows, I’m not sure anyone would’ve bat an eye or cried foul. And I believe that therein lies the key to bringing Jaws back to life in a way that fans will actually be on board with.
[Related] We Need More Killer Shark Movies
Earlier this year, 10 Cloverfield Lane brilliantly pushed the boundaries of franchise cinema and in many ways shattered all the molds, showing that the future of movie franchises may very well be much broader “cinematic universes.” The J.J. Abrams-produced film, which began its life as a standalone indie movie titled The Cellar, didn’t actually have much of anything to do with the found footage flick Cloverfield, but tethering it to the franchise proved to be a smart way to both get asses in the seats and give fans of the 2008 film something different yet something part of that same universe.
Which reminds me of something.
If John Carpenter had his way, the Halloween franchise would’ve ditched the Michael Myers story post-Halloween 2 and instead been used as an umbrella under which to tell stories that shared nothing in common aside from all being set on Halloween night, and he was pretty far ahead of his time in thinking that way. What he hoped to create was what we’d now call the Halloween Cinematic Universe, and it’s still kind of a bummer that it didn’t work out. But fans today, as evidenced by the success of 10 Cloverfield Lane and the years-later appreciation of Halloween 3, seem much more willing to accept that anthology approach to franchise cinema. And Jaws may be the perfect candidate to test those waters.
Rather than foolishly attempt to remake Spielberg’s original or somehow try to continue the Brody family’s increasingly strange and utterly nonsensical saga, it’d probably be much smarter business on the part of Universal Studios to instead give rise to a “Jaws Cinematic Universe.” The franchise, for starters, allows for limitless creative freedom, as any movie released under that umbrella need only feature a killer shark in order to technically pass as a Jaws movie. Each new film could be set in a different location and feature different characters, allowing for an innovative new franchise that wouldn’t have to ever worry about continuing previous storylines or setting the stage for future installments.
If the Jaws franchise must come back, why not bring it back in the most palatable form possible? We get more original shark movies on the big screen and Universal gets to inoffensively milk a massive cash cow that they’ve refrained from touching these past three decades. Sounds to me like a win-win for all.
The Jaws Cinematic Universe. I like the sound of it.
Editorials
Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel
The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.
That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.
It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.
That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.
The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’
For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.
This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.
This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.
Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.
So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.
The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.
Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.
While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.
At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.
After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.
You must be logged in to post a comment.