Editorials
After 15 Years, ‘Tremors 3’ Deserves Some Damn Respect
The Tremors franchise has shown remarkable staying power. Since the first film’s release in 1990, the franchise has seen four sequels and a 13-episode TV series see the light of day. Supposedly, Amazon has another TV series on the way, this time featuring original star Kevin Bacon. Tremors and Tremors 2: Aftershocks get most of the praise from fans but Tremors 3: Back to Perfection, which celebrated its 15th anniversary earlier this week, deserves some respect as well. It may embrace the comedic elements of the franchise more so than its predecessors, but its heart is in the right place and provides some solid entertainment for a direct-to-video creature feature.
The Tremors franchise actually has a special place in my heart. Since I wasn’t old enough to watch R-rated movies, I would roam Blockbuster and look for as many PG-13 horror movies that I could. I eventually stumbled across the first Tremors film and it quickly became one of those movies that I rented at least once a month. Tremors 2 eventually joined it and I double-featured them constantly (Critters was the other big PG-13 horror franchise to get frequent air time in my house). Nostalgia plays a big part in my liking for Tremors 3.
Tremors 3 follows fan favorite Michael Gross’s Burt Gummer back to Perfection, Nevada, the setting of the first film. Since the events of the first film, the town has now become a tourist attraction thanks to “Desert” Jack Sawyer (Shawn Christian), who has created mock-Graboid attack tours for gullible visitors. Though Graboids have been absent from Perfection for over a decade, Burt’s return brings them back. It isn’t long before they begin to evolve again, this time into something even deadlier than Graboids or Shriekers (Except not really; the Ass Blasters are just plain goofy).
Something that has always been admirable about the Tremors franchise has been its regard for continuity. Tremors 3 is even better about that then Tremors 2, seeing several cast members from the first film return. On top of franchise staple Burt Gummer, you’ve got the return of Mindy Sterngood (Ariana Richards, aka Lex from Jurassic Park), Nancy Sterngood (Charlotte Stewart), Miguel (the late Tony Genaro) and even Melvin Plug (Robert Jayne). Screenwriter John Whelpley even introduces Jodi Chang (Susan Chuang), the niece of the first film’s Walter Chang (Victor Wong, who passed away shortly before the film’s release). The actors are game for all of the ridiculousness that is thrown their way, which helps elevate the film above its mediocre script and somewhat limited budget.
Your affinity for Tremors 3 hinges on how much humor you like in your Tremors and how amusing you find the newest Graboid evolution, the Ass Blaster, to be. After all, this creature’s defining characteristic is that it flies after shooting a flame-filled fart out of its butt. Yes, you read that right. Tremors has a comedic element to it, but it mixes in a significant dose of horror to keep it from getting too silly. Even Tremors 2 has some truly frightening moments (the severed arms holding the car window always gave me the willies). Tremors 3 completely eschews the horror elements of the first two films and goes straight for camp. It’s a pure comedy, with the movie emphasizing meta humor even more than the first two (“It’s called a Graboid,” Jack corrects a tourist when he asks to have his picture taken with a “tremor”).
There are some pretty decent set pieces in Tremors 3, the best of which sees Burt hide inside a metal barrel only to be swallowed by a Graboid. Jack proceeds to use a chainsaw to cut Burt out of the Graboid’s stomach. It’s a great bit of gross-out humor, especially for a PG-rated film (and yes, Tremors 3 is rated PG). The climactic battle in the junkyard goes on for a little too long but still contains plenty of amusing moments. Another thing Tremors 3 has going for it is its one-liners. We’re not talking Shakesperean dialogue here, but there’s something inherently funny about Jodi yelling “Ha! Ass Blaster! Blast your own damn ass!” when she kills an Ass Blaster.
It’s not all great in Tremors 3 though. There is some horrendous CGI (close-up shots of the creatures feature practical effects but wide shots and action shots see the aforementioned computer-generated effects) and stilted dialogue mixed in with some questionable acting, but it could be said that that’s part of the movie’s charm. Tremors 3 had a reported budget of $6 million though (pretty high for a DTV release) so it’s disappointing to see the film introduce CGI to the franchise when it probably had the money to get a bit more creative with its practical effects. The pacing of the movie isn’t as tight as that of its predecessors either. It runs about 20 minutes too long (104 minutes) and it takes over an hour for the Ass Blasters to make their first appearance (the Shriekers from Tremors 2 barely factor into the film).
Tremors 3 isn’t high art, but it is a lot of fun and everyone involved has their heart in the right place. You have to admire the commitment and affection everyone seems to have for the film. After 15 years, it’s about time Tremors 3 was shown some damn respect.
Editorials
The Mark of the Beast: The Lasting Impact of ‘The Omen’ at 50
Of the three films that make up the Diabolical Trinity of classic religious horror films—Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), and The Omen (1976)—The Omen is the most purely entertaining.
While Rosemary’s Baby digs into the societal shifts of the 60s and The Exorcist explores spiritual tensions between faith and doubt in an ever-shifting world, The Omen seems most interested in just telling a thrilling story. It achieves this by blending two major trends of the 1970s, the devil movie and the paranoid thriller, into one crackling adventure yarn. In the process, The Omen has sparked fear and curiosity about what could happen in the “end times” if such events are to occur.
After seeing The Exorcist, producer Harvey Bernhard contacted writer David Seltzer and said something along the lines of, “Hey, write me one of those.” Seltzer, having never read the Bible, thought it would be an interesting challenge, so, according to various interviews, he read the Bible and several commentaries in search of a story. Then he stumbled upon a passage in the book of Revelation, the image of a great Beast rising out of the sea, that sparked his imagination. In the commentaries, he found that the sea represented politics in some interpretations of the text, and he began building his story on that foundation.
Seltzer has told this story often, and I am inclined to believe him. However, from there, much of the theological-sounding lore of The Omen was created purely by Seltzer. Many of the ideas surrounding The Antichrist in the film appear to be drawn much more from the pop-eschatology sensation of the 1970s, The Late Great Planet Earth by Hal Lindsay, than any Biblical source.
Lindsay’s book was the bestselling nonfiction book of the 1970s and re-popularized views of the “last days” that had been dying along with fundamentalism for decades, namely Dispensationalism, Millennialism, and the Pre-Tribulation Rapture. In dispensationalism, history is broken into several epochs of time (or dispensations) that culminate in the return of Christ and his thousand-year (millennial) reign.
Before this return, a seven-year Tribulation will occur in which the Antichrist comes to power and persecutes all who oppose him, culminating in a battle between the forces of good and evil at the valley of Megiddo, usually called Armageddon. Of course, in this worldview, the true believers in Jesus will be lifted out, or raptured, before all this takes place. Since the publication and popularity of The Late Great Planet Earth, this has been the prominent belief in Evangelical and Fundamentalist Christian circles, though Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and mainline Protestant denominations largely reject it.
Lindsay also did something unique that had not been the case even in dispensationalist circles before him—he posited that the creation of the modern state of Israel in 1948 started the countdown to Armageddon. Fans of the film will immediately realize where Seltzer ran with this idea in the first line of the poem created for the movie: “When the Jews return to Zion…”
Damien Thorn and the Creation of Horror’s “Innocent Villain”

Seltzer’s next inspiration focused on the idea of the Antichrist as a child, what he would call the film’s “innocent villain.” In watching The Omen, it is readily apparent that Damien Thorn (Harvey Stephens) does not really do anything evil beyond a bit of normal kid mischief. Even the moment in which Damien knocks Kathy Thorn (Lee Remick) over a second-floor railing can be read as an accident orchestrated by Damien’s diabolically connected nanny, Mrs. Baylock (Billie Whitelaw). The film takes this idea of the innocent villain a step further by casting Gregory Peck, best known for playing arguably the greatest father in film history, Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird (1962), as Damien’s earthly father, an element that greatly satisfied Seltzer.
The New Testament itself says very little about the Antichrist and certainly nothing about his childhood. In fact, the word antichrist is used twice (1 John 2:18 and 2 John 7 for the curious) and refers to groups of people, not a particular person. There is also a passage in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 in which the writer (usually attributed to Paul) discusses “The Man of Lawlessness” who will “exalt himself over everything that is called God” and “proclaim himself to be God.”
Then there is the Beast of Revelation chapter 13 with “seven heads and ten horns” that Seltzer latched onto, which has been interpreted in a multitude of ways over the centuries. Powerful people throughout history, from Charlemagne, various Popes during the Protestant Reformation era, Napoleon and Hitler, to modern politicians, including Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, have all had the label placed on them by various circles. Even religious leaders like Billy Graham have not escaped being called the Antichrist.
Lindsay and modern dispensationalists are certain the Antichrist will be a 21st-century individual as they are equally certain that the Rapture, Tribulation, and return of Christ are imminent, likely within their lifetime. Many scholars and theologians, however, interpret these passages as symbolic representations of the Roman Empire and the first-century Caesars who persecuted, tortured, and murdered Christians and Jews who refused to submit to Imperial rule and worship them as gods. For example, that the Beast from the sea in Revelation has seven heads is symbolic of the famous seven mountains of Rome, with the 10 horns referring to rulers and magistrates of the Empire.
But this is all really of no matter to Seltzer and the story of The Omen. Instead of being concerned with any historical or theological accuracy, he instead built his own lore, which sends Robert Thorn and photographer Keith Jennings (David Warner) on a globetrotting investigation into the nature of the Antichrist and how to stop him. Some of this lore includes the child being born of a jackal, the reaction of animals, the protective cult that arises around Damien, the daggers of Megiddo, and maybe most interesting of all, the peculiar flaws in Jennings’s photographs that presage the ways certain individuals will die.
All these aspects are where the paranoid thrillers come in, as films like Blow Up (1966), Z (1969), The Conversation (1974), The Parallax View (1974), 3 Days of the Condor (1975), and All the President’s Men (1976) were all the rage at the time. Especially in the wake of the Watergate scandal, the idea of journalists (like Jennings) as ordinary heroes who could bring down the powerful, nefarious forces in the world was exactly what audiences craved. And what greater hidden evil force was there than the Devil? This is also why the device of the daggers of Megiddo is so important to a movie like this. If Damien is indeed the Antichrist, there must be a way to stop him, though in the Biblical text, the only power capable of destroying the Devil is God Himself.
The Mark of the Beast, 666, and the Film’s Most Famous Religious Symbolism

The piece of lore created for the movie with the most solid Biblical grounding is the Mark of the Beast. Revelation describes a mark on the forehead or hand of those who worship the Beast and his image. Again, this is symbolic language differentiating those who belong to the power of the Roman Empire and those who belong to Christ, who have the Mark of the Lamb. In Seltzer’s hands, the mark is very literal, a birthmark that is borne by not only the Antichrist but all his followers, meaning they are marked from before birth as belonging to Satan, and there is no escaping it. This is all rather distressing to the priest Father Brennan (Patrick Troughton), who betrays his mark by warning Thorn about Damien and pays the price by memorably being impaled by a spire that falls from a church steeple after being struck by lightning.
Why is the mark three sixes? Again, this is drawn from a passage in Revelation that states that the Beast can be identified by calculating his number. In Biblical scholarship, this is believed to be the sum of the name of a man transferred into Hebrew numerology, a practice in which each Hebrew letter also represents a number. Using this method, the number of the name Caesar Nero, which many believe to be the most logical choice, is six hundred sixty-six. In the film and elsewhere, this number is changed to three individual sixes. According to the film, this represents the Diabolical Trinity (a designation also unique to the film) made up of Satan, the Antichrist, and the False Prophet. That Damien carries this unique birthmark under his hair convinces Robert that the child is the Antichrist, and it’s up to him to destroy him.
Part of what makes The Omen great is its ambiguity. Damien could be the Antichrist, or he could be at the center of a series of coincidences. Director Richard Donner stated in interviews that he believed Robert Thorn had gone insane by the end of the film, which, to Donner, is the only explanation for why Thorn would attempt to kill an innocent child. However, that enigmatic smile in the final shot suggests that Damien does embody a spirit of great evil. The sequels, however, all but erase this ambiguity.
In audiences, The Omen sparked a renewed interest in the concept of the Antichrist and the dispensationalist interpretation of the end times that continues to echo throughout the last five decades. Around the time of the film’s release, even Elvis Presley was photographed brandishing a paperback copy of Seltzer’s novelization. Dispensationalist authors like Hal Lindsay, Tim LaHaye, and John Hagee have made millions publishing books and giving lectures about the Antichrist and the end of the world.
The Legacy of The Omen, 50 Years Later

Though A Thief in the Night (1972) preceded The Omen in initial release, it gained quite a resurgence (along with the ability to create three sequels) in the wake of the popularity of The Omen and went on to scar the psyches of Evangelical children for decades. Hal Lindsay was also able to release a film version of The Late Great Planet Earth in 1978, complete with narration and a brief onscreen appearance from Orson Welles.
In the 1990s, the Left Behind series became a cultural phenomenon, spawning twelve books in the core series, a YA spinoff series, video games, and a movie series (2000-2005) starring Kirk Cameron. A bigger studio adaptation of the first book was released in 2014, starring Nicolas Cage. 20th Century Fox and The Omen got in on the renewed “end-of-the-world” vigor by releasing a remake of the original film on June 6, 2006. The franchise was revived once again in 2024 with The First Omen, which explores ideas of the Antichrist and the motivations of those in power in our current religious, social, and political context.
But despite all the sequels, spinoffs, rip-offs, remakes, and “end times” money grabs of the last 50 years, the original version of The Omen remains untouchable. Its greatest strength is that it seeks, first and foremost, to entertain. And it does so admirably.
After half a century, its influence can be felt in horror, the culture at large, and even in various faith circles. It is a testament to the power of story and film that, consciously or unconsciously, fans of The Omen and those who have never seen it alike are, to this very day, marked by the Beast.

You must be logged in to post a comment.