Connect with us

Editorials

‘Solomon Kane’ – Appreciating the Pulp Horrors of an Underrated Dark Fantasy Film

Published

on

Solomon Kane

With the exception of J.R.R. Tolkien, Robert E. Howard is likely the most influential author in all of fantasy fiction, with his beloved Conan the Barbarian stories transporting avid readers to the thrilling days of high adventure. However, the character also has a surprising link to the horror genre due to Howard’s occasional use of Cosmic Horror elements, something that was at least partially influenced by his long-time friendship with H.P. Lovecraft. Luckily for horror fans, the man-eating beasts and indescribable Elder Gods of Conan weren’t the author’s only foray into spooky tales about steadfast heroes encountering supernatural terror.

Years before Conan first rode out of Cimmeria, Howard was already a well-known figure in the world of weird fiction because of his other popular creation, the demon-hunting puritan known as Solomon Kane. First published in 1928, the swashbuckling hero became incredibly popular with fans of horror and pulp adventures alike, eventually making the leap to comic-books and audio-dramas as his legend grew.

But despite the massive success of John Millius’ Conan the Barbarian adaptation, it would be decades before a studio would succeed in bringing Solomon Kane to the big screen, with the character’s darker brand of horror-fantasy making him slightly less appealing to general audiences. In fact, even though Wandering Star acquired the rights to the character back in 1997 with the intent of producing a LOTR-style trilogy, a finished film would only be half-heartedly released in North America in September of 2012 after a series of complicated legal hurdles and a botched marketing campaign.

This is incredibly unfortunate, as MJ Bassett’s grim-dark take on Kane remains one of the most fun and faithful adaptations of 1920s pulp fiction, with the film’s gloomy atmosphere and compelling main character making it a must watch for fans of medieval horror. The movie was actually positively received by most critics (many of whom viewed the film as far back as 2009), but limited screenings and little-to-no marketing meant that the flick never found the audience it rightfully deserved.

That’s why I think it’s high time that we look back on one of the most underrated dark fantasy films ever made.

“You can tell your master that I am not yet ready for hell!”

A French, Czech and British co-production, Solomon Kane stars James Purefoy as our troubled lead character, with the story serving as a somber origin story and describing Solomon’s quest for redemption after leading a life of sin. When a Puritan’s daughter is sequestered by possessed fiends, Solomon embarks on a rescue mission that leads him back to his noble roots in a classic combination of swords, sorcery and undead shenanigans amid a plague-ridden 1600s England.

Naturally, Purefoy gives his all in what should have been a career-defining performance, allowing the gruff adventurer just enough edge to keep him likable while maintaining the character’s ruthless demeanor and excelling in the film’s vicious fight sequences. While some of Solomon’s lines may come off as trite after decades of similar fantasy films – many of which were influenced by the same source material – Purefoy’s intensity more than makes up for the script’s bluntness.

The actor is also backed by more than a few genre veterans, such as horror royalty Alice Krige in a surprisingly non-villainous role, as well as The Exorcist alumni Max Von Sydow in his second appearance in a Robert E. Howard adaptation (having previously portrayed King Osric in 1982’s Conan). We also get some creative monster designs by Underworld’s Patrick Tatopoulos, with the artist coming up with nightmarish demons as well as a slasher-inspired main villain that adds even more genre flair to an already stylish flick.

And on the subject of monsters, MJ clearly draws from her previous genre experience (specifically on the equally underrated Deathwatch) when crafting moments of increasing dread. From an insane preacher that feeds his ghoulish flock with human flesh to Solomon’s cringe-inducing crucifixion, the film is peppered with genuinely scary sequences that you just don’t see in typical fantasy movies.

There’s also plenty of good old-fashioned gore, with neither Purefoy or the effects artists holding back when Solomon slices through throats and impales villains on his deadly rapier. And the best part is that most of the blood sprays are practical, with CGI fluids reserved only for spicing up some of the larger battle scenes. The movie also has a near-post-apocalyptic vibe going on due to its bleak and diseased depiction of England, making everything even creepier.

Solomon Kane movie

“There was a time when the world was plunging into darkness. A time of witchcraft and sorcery, when no one stood against evil.”

Despite inventing much of this tragic backstory, I really appreciate how the movie commits to its dark atmosphere while staying true to Howard’s vision of Kane, as it’s not every day that we see a hard-R fantasy flick with this much love for its source material. I mean, can you imagine what Netflix’s The Witcher would have been like if they had taken the books this seriously?

Admittedly, the experience isn’t perfect, with the film suffering from a mostly predictable script and some budgetary issues (most of them related to hastily rendered CGI creatures), but you’ve got to admit that the filmmakers are getting a lot of mileage of their $40 million budget. Solomon Kane may not have the epic scale of Conan, but it’s only a couple of million dollars away from feeling like a blockbuster experience.

Hell, I’d even argue that the story’s reduced scale sometimes works in the film’s favor, forcing the narrative to take a more introspective approach as we focus on Solomon’s internal demons instead of constant battles and overused fantasy tropes.

The film’s dark subject matter and high levels of violence mean that it likely wouldn’t have connected with audiences even if it had benefited from a wide release, but I believe that Solomon Kane would eventually have been saved by online word-of-mouth had it come out during the age of streaming. However, while this woefully underseen movie was once cursed to inhabit bargain bins and decrepit rental stores, it has recently developed a sizable cult following as Robert E. Howard fans search for other adaptations of the author’s work and stumble upon this labor of love.

While we can only imagine what the proposed follow-ups would have been like (I personally believe that they would have been even better than the first film, benefitting from more varied mythologies and settings), the mere fact that this loving tribute to dark fantasy even exists is already a small miracle in and of itself.

That being said, it’s never too late for a streaming giant to pick up the rights for a long-awaited sequel so that Purefoy’s Kane might ride again…

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading