Editorials
13 Movie Moments Guaranteed to Make You Cringe!
Us horror fans are known for being a strong-stomached group of people, but there are some things that are still able to get under our skin. Most people just think about the gory moments in horror movies, but a horror film can still shock and disturb you without being gory. This list is filled with moments like that. Whether it’s pus, eye-gougings, teeth-pullings, castrations, clitorectomies or any other number of bodily mutilations, everyone has at least one thing that makes them turn away from the screen. Which one makes you cringe the most?
***SPOILERS and NSFW imagery for many films below***
Pus
I’ve talked about my issues with pus before and specifically mentioned two of the three scenes listed below. Give me all the blood and gore you want, but the second pus gets involved I’m done. Gross!
Hostel
Few things are worse than losing an eye, but what about losing an eye and then having pus spew out of your eye socket? That’s what happens when Paxton (Jay Hernandez) snips off Kana’s (Jennifer Lim) eye in Eli Roth’s Hostel.
Dead Alive
Peter Jackson’s Dead Alive is lauded for its excessive amounts of gore, but it’s all so silly that it’s never really that disturbing. The same cannot be said about the scene in which Lionel’s (Timothy Balme) decomposing mother Vera (Elizabeth Moody) attempts to eat a bowl of custard during a dinner party. A boil on Vera’s cheek bursts and squirts pus into a guest’s custard bowl and he eats it. It sets the standard for gross-out moments in horror films.
Demons
Poor Rosemary (Geretta Giancarlo) never stood a chance. After getting her face nicked by an evil demon mask, the wound slowly becomes infected. When it becomes too much to handle, Rosemary runs to the bathroom to give it a closer look. I’m sure you can guess what happens next. PUS EVERYWHERE. Then a demonic transformation for good measure.
Nails
Imprint
Takashi Miike’s (Audition) entry into Showtime’s Masters of Horror was pulled from the first season due to concerns about the film’s graphic nature. Yes, Imprint was too graphic for Showtime(!), and no scene is more indicative to why as much as the infamous fingernail scene. A young prostitute (Michié) is tortured after being accused of stealing a jade ring from her Madam. She is burned and has needles driven into her gums, but nothing is as difficult to watch as seeing more needles driven under her fingernails. It is one of the most disturbing moments in horror history.
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003)
Marcus Nispel’s remake of Tobe Hooper’s classic tells you in the first scene that something is going to happen to someone’s fingernail, but you’re still not prepared for it when Leatherface (Andrew Bryniarski) carries Andy (Mike Vogel) down into the basement. Desperate, Andy claws at the wall to stop Leatherface, losing a fingernail or two in the process.

P2
First, P2 is underrated. Second, it features a really grotesque sequence in which protagonist Angela (Rachel Nichols) detaches a fingernail and is forced to pull it off of her finger. Trapped in the garage of the office building she works at, Angela manages to escape her captor Thomas (Wes Bentley) and make it to the exit g ate. After squeezing her hand through the gate with her cell phone in an attempt to get a signal, she drops the phone. Just out of reach, she claws at the ground to try to grab it and loses a fingernail. Watching her pull it off is simply cringeworthy.

Black Swan
There are a lot of disturbing body horror moments in Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan, but non quite as shocking as Nina (Natalie Portman) pulling her cuticle back, only to lose even more skin off of her finger. It hurts just thinking about it!

Eyes
A Serbian Film
One could argue that everything about A Serbian Film makes you want to turn away from the film. I don’t think I’ve ever heard someone say that they “enjoyed” it. It’s more of a movie you endure. Still, it does feature one shocking moment (of many) in which Miloš (Srđan Todorović) literally fucks a man’s eye-socket to death.

Zombie
This one is a little cliché if only because it always pops up whenever someone talks about disturbing eye scenes in film, but it pops up so often for a reason! Paola (Olga Karlatos) manages to escape a zombie’s grasp and slams the door on its fingers, only for the zombie to break through the door and pull Paola eye-first into a large wooden splinter.
Mouth
Oldboy
Chan-Wook Park’s masterpiece of revenge features one graphic scene in which Oh Dae-Su severs his tongue in a last-ditch effort to appease his enemy. It doesn’t work, but the moment the scissors touch the tongue you can’t help but look away. Shockingly, Park doesn’t even show the tongue cutting, but the mental image and very real sound effects make it difficult to stomach.
Bug
Bug is one of the rare films to receive an F CinemaScore from audiences. This is probably due to the fact that it was marketed as a killer big movie. It’s not a killer bug movie. Rather, it’s a tale of a paranoid schizophrenic (Michael Shannon) who believes that microscopic bugs were planted inside his body by the government. In one memorable scene he pulls his tooth out when he thinks a colony of bugs is living inside it.
Genitals
Antichrist
Also known as the movie where Charlotte Gainsbourg cuts off her clitoris with a pair of scissors and Willem Dafoe ejaculates blood. Need I say more?

Hostel: Part II
Alright, so this one may not really be a head turner, but it sure is funny. For most of Hostel: Part II, we are led to believe that Todd (Richard Burgi) is the psychotic one and his pal Stuart (Roger Bart) is the shy, reserved one. Turns out that is not the case and Stuart is a raging psychotic. This makes it even more cathartic when Beth (Lauren German) cuts off his penis and feeds it to a dog.
Editorials
Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel
The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.
That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.
It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.
That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.
The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’
For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.
This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.
This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.
Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.
So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.
The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.
Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.
While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.
At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.
After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.
You must be logged in to post a comment.