Connect with us

Editorials

Rob Zombie Fixed the ‘Halloween’ Franchise’s Biggest Problem

Published

on

I have a serious bone to pick with the Halloween franchise.

In 1978, John Carpenter introduced the world to Michael Myers, who was at the time depicted as an almost supernatural shape hell-bent on murdering, with virtually no discernible reasoning, everyone in his path on Halloween night. Just shy of 30 years later, Rob Zombie came along and remade Halloween, and the biggest gripe most fans had with the musician-turned-filmmaker’s updated vision was that Michael’s madness was attributed to little more than a rough childhood and bad parenting. Myers was reduced to a run of the mill serial killer, and Carpenter himself has gone on record as stating that all the backstory served only to suck the mystery and terror out of the character he created.

But even if you hated Zombie’s vision of the franchise, you have to respect one thing about it.

And it’s a BIG thing.

halloween-1

Halloween, 1978

It’s of course no secret by now that the Michael Myers mask in the original Halloween is actually Don Post’s Captain Kirk mask, which was picked up from a local shop by the crew, painted white, and turned into one of the most iconic images in cinema history. The low-budget, outside the box approach worked and it worked with terrifying effectiveness.

halloween-2-mask

Halloween 2, 1981

That very same mask, worn primarily by Nick Castle, was later reused a few years later in Halloween 2; the role played this time around by Dick Warlock. Weathered from being in storage between films, the mask took on an even creepier look for the 1981 sequel. But alas, from that point forward, Michael Myers unfortunately never looked that good again.

By the time Myers was brought back to life for Halloween 4, the original mask was tossed aside in favor of a new one, and with each subsequent installment, the look of Myers continued to evolve. The same can be said of each of the big franchise icons, but whereas guys like Freddy, Jason, and even Leatherface retained their visual appeal, Michael wasn’t so lucky. In fact, he seemed to look worse and worse every time, and the quality control on the part of the costuming department was so poor that there’s even one scene in Halloween 4 where the mask’s hair inexplicably turns blonde. Worse yet, there’s a moment in Halloween H20 where the mask, believe it or not, is computer-generated.

But glaring errors aside, Michael Myers always looked like a complete joke in the post-Halloween 2 sequels, so much so that watching them back today, it’s hard to even take him seriously; and it’s almost impossible to actually find him intimidating or scary. In Halloween 4, the costume is padded to such an extent that Michael looks like a bloated dude with women’s shoulder pads, and in Halloween 5, the mask has a bizarrely long neck that sticks out over the jumpsuit.

And things got no better from there…

halloween-4-mask

Halloween 4, 1988

halloween-5-mask

Halloween 5, 1989

halloween-6-mask

Halloween 6, 1995

halloween-7-mask

Halloween H20, 1998

halloween-8-mask

Halloween: Resurrection, 2002

Ironically, the only times Michael Myers actually looked imposing in the original Halloween franchise were the times where the least amount of thought was put into the look of the character. Again, the crew seems to have purchased and converted that Captain Kirk mask on a whim; Tommy Lee Wallace, who went on to direct Halloween 3, reportedly bought the mask for a mere $1.98. So why then, when the budgets were much bigger and the franchise had become a hit money-maker, did the filmmakers have such a hard time with making Michael Myers look halfway decent? We may never know, but one thing is for certain: in the looks department, Rob Zombie totally nailed Myers.

While Zombie’s Halloween may have been a complete remake, the newly-designed Myers mask looked the way the original mask might after sustaining years of abuse; cracked, decaying, and weathered, the mask was the scariest in the franchise’s history, effectively washing the terrible sequel masks from the collective memory of us fans. And the man underneath the mask, Tyler Mane, was the most physically intimidating actor to ever don the overalls, making Myers perhaps even scarier – admittedly unnecessary backstory aside – than the Michael Myers we first met back in 1978.

For Zombie’s Halloween 2, the mask became even more battered and broken, missing an entire chunk after the abuse Myers took in the 2007 remake. Some fans took issue with the fact that the missing piece of the mask revealed a massive beard underneath – a Rob Zombie trademark if there ever was one – but to have an issue with Myers having a beard is to be okay with the fact that Myers takes the time to shave in between Halloweens… I don’t know about you, but I just can’t picture that silliness. “Hobo Myers” is cool in my book.

Did Rob Zombie make the Halloween franchise great again? That’s up for debate. But did he make Michael Myers look cool again? Did he make Michael Myers scary again? With 100% certainty I can say that yes, he absolutely did.

And that damn sure counts for something.

halloween-2-myers-mask

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has four awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading