Editorials
Ranking the Slashers That Tried to Cash In on the Success of ‘Scream’!
4. Urban Legend (1998)
Let’s be honest: Urban Legend wouldn’t be half as good as it is if it wasn’t for Rebecca Gayheart’s balls-to-the-wall performance during the film’s climax. I swear whenever someone answers a question correctly I hear her yelling “DING! DING! DING!” in my head over and over again. Urban Legend actually has a lot going for it. The main draw is its central premise, about a psychopath who kills people in the style of urban legends. It was also directed by a pre-Valentine Jamie Blanks, who seems much more passionate behind the camera than he was with that film. The film is filled out by a pretty impressive cast. In addition to Gayheart you’ve got Tara Reid (who’s got a great chase scene but doesn’t come close to the quality of a certain other chase scene I will bring up in a bit), a pre-Smallville Michael Rosenbaum, Danielle Harries, Robert Englund, Jared Leto, Joshua Jackson (there’s even a meta nod to Dawson’s Creek that inspires laughs every time I watch it). Silvio Horta’s screenplay is playful and fast-paced. Overall, Urban Legend is a ton of fun and one of the better cash-ins on Scream‘s success.
Just for fun, here’s a supercut of the best parts of Urban Legend. You’ll notice they all have one thing in common.
3. Bride of Chucky (1998)
Much like Halloween, the Child’s Play films had essentially died by the mid-90s. Child’s Play 3 grosses a mere $14.9 million domestically in 1991 and even franchise creator Don Mancini would go on to admit that he had run out of idea. That is, at least, until after Scream came out and he decided to take the franchise in a new direction. Bride of Chucky marks the shift of the Child’s Play franchise into one of self-referential comedy. Gone are most of the horror aspects of the previous films; in are scenes in which Chucky (Brad Dourif) argue over whether they need to use a condom since they are made of rubber (or is it plastic?). Spoiler alert: They did need to use a condom. Bride of Chucky is one of the more enjoyable slashers of the 90s and this is mostly thanks to the vocal performances of Dourif and series newcomer Jennifer Tilly who, lets face it, is pretty amazing. The film knows exactly what kind of movie it is and there isn’t a dull moment in any of its 89 minutes. It is arguably the best sequel in the franchise, at least until Curse of Chucky came along.

2. Final Destination (2000)
Technically, Final Destination isn’t a slasher movie. But it also kind of is a slasher movie. The serial killer just happens to be death itself as opposed to a flesh and blood killer. Final Destination is the most original and creative film on this list. It features some incredibly creative kills that constantly keep you guessing. Watching Final Destination is such a fun experience that it doesn’t matter if it peaks early with the bus kill. James Wong directs with a firm hand and a keen eye while the screenplay (which Wong co-wrote with Jeffrey Reddick and The X-Files‘s Glen Morgan). The film only drags in any scene that Roger Guenveur Smith’s FBI agent is on screen, but otherwise Final Destination is an exciting roller coaster ride of a film that is more inventive than most horror films released at the time. The later films would inject a bit more humor into the proceedings, but the original is a dark, horrifying tale.

1. I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)
It should come as no surprise that I Know What You Did Last Summer tops this list. Many of you know how I feel about the film. Personal bias aside, I Know What You Did Last Summer is a solid teen film. It also has the distinction of being the only film on this list written by Scream screenwriter Kevin Williamson (he did do some work on the Halloween: H20 script but wasn’t credited). Of course, I Know What You Did Last Summer is nowhere near as witty as Scream, but it doesn’t try to be. It’s just a good old fashioned slasher movie with one of the best third acts in horror movie history (I’m being totally serious). With the beauty pageant, Helen’s (Sarah Michelle Gellar) superb chase scene and Julie’s (Jennifer Love Hewitt) confrontation with the fisherman on his boat, I Know What You Did Last Summer more than makes up for it’s arguably slow beginning. Director Jim Gillespie (Venom) keeps things relatively bloodless, but the charming cast and John Debney’s powerful score keep you interested. It’s not a flawless film, but it’s a perfect time capsule of 1997 and the best Scream imitator.

Which of the above films is your favorite? Let us know in the comments below!
Editorials
André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies
In this day and age, the word “troll” is often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.
It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shouts “troll” at the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.
For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.
The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.
As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?
Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.
Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.
There is always a small risk whenever using the term “mockumentary” to describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.
In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.
Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.
Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we call “found footage“.

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.
You must be logged in to post a comment.