Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Ranking the Slashers That Tried to Cash In on the Success of ‘Scream’!

Published

on

ranking scream imitators

On December 20th, Wes Craven’s classic slasher film Scream turns 20 years old. Many of you know how I feel about Scream. I’ve made my love for it and its sequels (yes, even Scream 3) apparent in the past, but the original was a landmark film that redefined the horror genre. I’ll be spending this week writing a handful of posts about Scream (call it “Scream Week,” if you will) in the hopes that more people will join in on celebrating this wonderful film. 

When Scream was released in 1996, the horror genre was essentially dead. The endless supply of horror sequels being released were doing worse and worse at the box office, and original horror films were failing critically and commercially . When Scream turned out to be a box office success and a hit with critics, studios started turning back to the genre that had long been thought dead. None of the imitators would be able to match Scream in terms of quality (or box office numbers), but most of them have somewhat redeemable qualities. The eight films listed below are some of Scream’s most high-profile imitators, and I’ve taken the liberty of ranking them (as I’m wont to do) from best to worst!

***WARNING: The ending of Urban Legend will be spoiled, because how can you discuss that film and not mention its ending?***


8. I’ve Been Waiting For You (1998)

The first of two Lois Duncan adaptations on this list (this time of her novel Gallows Hill), I’ve Been Waiting For You is one of the lazier attempts to cash in on the late ’90s teen slasher craze. Not helping matters is that it was released just five months after I Know What You Did Last Summer, which makes I’ve Been Waiting For You‘s mediocrity even more apparent. Duane Poole’s screenplay ham-fistedly morphs Duncan’s supernatural premise (about a girl with powers and a connection to the Salem witch trials) into a bloodless and cliché-ridden slasher. While it can be entertaining in that cheesy TV movie way, especially when you realize the cast consists of then-unknowns Sarah Chalke, Christian Campbell (Neve’s brother), Ben Foster and a post-Punky Brewster Soleil Moon Frye. Ultimately, it is nothing more than a disjointed, watered down and forgettable dud.

ranking scream imitators


7. Valentine (2001)

What makes Jamie Blanks’s (Urban LegendValentine such a crushing disappointment is that it was adapted from a really good Tom Savage novel. While it’s far from the worst slasher ever made, it is painfully average. The lack of gore and scares added to the fact that the killer’s identity is obvious from the get-go make this one of the more forgettable horror films of the 2000s. This is the type of film that Scream was sending up, so releasing it five years after Scream (and one year after Scream 3) seems like a poor choice. Had the tone of the film been more ironic then it might have worked, but as it stands Valentine is a completely forgettable film (Don Davis’s score is on point though).

ranking scream imitators


6. Cherry Falls (2000)

This is where this list becomes really difficult for me, because I genuinely love all of the films from here on out (I am a child of the 90s after all). Cherry Falls is an above-average slasher film that suffered from a horrific post-production process due to the MPAA. A clever premise (a serial killer stalks virgins in a small Virginia town) with solid directing from Geoffrey Wright, as well as strong performances from Michael Biehn, Jay Mohr and the late Brittany Murphy make for a highly entertaining and self-aware slasher (though not quite as clever as it thinks it is). Unfortunately it was doomed to be a TV movie and was released on the USA Network in 2000.

ranking scream imitators


5. Halloween: H20 (1998)

I’m one of those weirdos who likes to pretend HalloweenHalloween II and Halloween: H20 are the only films in the Halloween franchise. Sue me. H20 wouldn’t have existed if it weren’t for Scream reviving the slasher sub-genre (the last Halloween sequel grossed just $15.1 million in 1995), and lucky for us we got an above average sequel with a tour de force performance from Jamie Lee Curtis. While it curiously ignored the events of Halloween 3-6, the franchise returned to its roots by pitting Laurie Strode (Curtis) against her brother Michael Myers. While it’s not a particularly scary film (save for that suspenseful garbage disposal sequence), it does have a taut, fast-paced script (making for an all-too-brief 86-minute runtime) and impressive direction from horror mainstay Steve Miner (Friday the 13th Part II and Part IIILake Placid). There is a sense of fun present here that was lacking from the other Halloween sequels and for that it should be commended.

ranking scream imitators

Pages: 1 2

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

190 Comments

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading