Editorials
8 People We Want to Direct ‘Scream 5’
Before you scroll down to start bashing me in the comments, let me get one thing out there: I don’t think Scream 5 will ever happen. This isn’t to say I don’t want it to happen, but I don’t think it ever will. With Scream 4‘s disappointing box office gross in 2011 (a $38.1 million domestic take on a $40 million production budget), the disputes between screenwriter Kevin Williamson and the Weinstein brothers and the tragic death of franchise director Wes Craven last year (not to mention the minuscule ratings for MTV’s Scream: The Series), there is no way a studio would greenlight a fourth sequel to a franchise that audiences don’t seem to care about anymore. It’s a sad truth, especially for fans of the franchise or slasher fans in general, but it’s a truth nonetheless.
Let’s pretend for a moment that Scream 5 is actually a possibility. Imagine an alternate reality where Scream 4 grossed over $100 million, Kevin Williamson had an amicable relationship with the Weinsteins and Scream: The Series earned higher ratings than Teen Wolf in its prime. If all of those things were real, then Scream 5 would be a definite possibility, but the franchise would need a new director (RIP Wes Craven). Thanks to the suggestion of Bloody Disgusting commenter cduns (and the additional prodding of commenter ScriptGiverTJ), we’re going to take a look some directors who would be perfect for directing Scream 5 should it ever come to fruition. It’s not ever going to happen, but one can dream, can’t one?
Sam Raimi
Let’s get the inevitable “this is never going to happen in a million years” pick out of the way. First of all, it does make sense. Raimi was initially considered to direct Scream back in 1996, but screenwriter Kevin Williamson didn’t think he understood the type of film he wanted to see get made. Well, 20 years later and I bet he has a pretty good idea now! In 1996 Raimi was primarily known for directing the Evil Dead trilogy. He’s got a more eclectic set of films on his resumé now so he’s probably the most qualified to direct something like Scream 5.

AP IMAGES/INVISION
James Wan
Again, this is one of those “it’ll never happen in a million years” things, unless Wan was allowed to write the screenplay as well (which may not be a bad idea). Wan keeps returning to the genre that made him famous even after saying he was going to take a break from it before. It’s not like he’s never done a slasher before either (Saw, hello?), so he’s got the skills. He would be perfect for Scream 5. Maybe once he’s done with Aquaman.

AP IMAGES
Adam Robitel
The director of The Taking of Deborah Logan proved himself with that film, and now he’s directing Insidious Chapter 4 which is due for release next October. Deborah Logan was one of the biggest surprises to come out of 2014, and the fact that Robitel was trusted to take James Wan’s and Leigh Whannel’s places as the director of the next Insidious installment bodes well for the youngartist. He may not be eager to tackle another horror sequel, but he would no doubt bring a lot of talent behind the camera. Let’s just forget he was one of the four(!) writers of Paranormal Activity: The Ghost Dimension.

DEADLINE
Max Landis
Truthfully, the son of famed director John Landis hasn’t done much to make us think that he would be qualified to handle Scream 5. He broke into the scene with his script for Chronicle back in 2012, but since then he has written the scripts for clunkers like American Ultra and Victor Frankenstein. Still, there is a talent there, and while he only has one directing gig under his belt, a fresh face could be just what the Scream franchise needs.

MAT HAYWARD/GETTY IMAGES
Karyn Kusama
Karyn Kusama has proven she can direct horror comedy (Jennifer’s Body is good. I don’t care what any of you say.) as well as mature psychological horror (The Invitation). Wouldn’t it also be refreshing to see a major franchise like Scream move forward with a female director? There are so few female horror directors out there that putting someone like Kusama at the helm would be a huge statement for the industry. That statement aside, Kusama has more than proven herself behind the camera and a Scream film directed by her would no doubt be a fascinating experiement.

INDIEWIRE
Greg McLean
The director of Wolf Creek and Rogue may seem like an odd choice for Scream 5, but McLean needs to do something to make everyone forget The Darkness ever happened (though it seems like The Belko Experiment (our review), being released in March, will do just that). All kidding aside, McLean is a skilled director who knows how to film some carnage. Scream has never been known for its gore (they’re all tame by today’s standards), but McClean could emphasize the brutality of the violence that is normally downplayed in the franchise. It would be a new kind of Scream, but if the box office response to Scream 4 was any indication, “more of the same” is not what people want.

JASON MERRITT/GETTY IMAGES
Adam Wingard
Wingard may not exactly be willing to direct another sequel to a 90s classic after the chilly reception his Blair Witch received this year (from everyone except us, apparently), but Scream 5 could be his chance to make things right with the rest of you! He’s no stranger to meta horror, as films like You’re Next, The Guest, and A Horrible Way to Die have shown, so the Scream franchise would fit his career like a glass slipper on Cinderella’s flawless foot.

MARK DAVIS/GETTY IMAGES
Jennifer Kent
Jennifer Kent hasn’t delivered a new film since she blew audiences away with her directorial debut The Babadook two years ago. Scream 5 would probably be a bit beneath her since The Babadook is a bit more classy than a slasher sequel, but she could bring her level of class to the franchise to inject some new life into it! I mean, Scream is a pretty classy slasher, right? Anyone?

LARRY BUSACCA/GETTY IMAGES
Who would you like to see direct Scream 5 in this magical fantasy land where Scream 5 is even a possibility (just pray there’s no time travel in it)? Let us know in the comments below!
Editorials
André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies
In this day and age, the word “troll” is often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.
It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shouts “troll” at the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.
For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.
The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.
As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?
Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.
Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.
There is always a small risk whenever using the term “mockumentary” to describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.
In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.
Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.
Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we call “found footage“.

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.
You must be logged in to post a comment.